Cover not available
Part of
Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work
Edited by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria
[Studies in Language Companion Series 220] 2021
► pp. 9–34

Chapter 2
Ad hoc categorization in linguistic interaction

| University of Bologna
The aim of this paper is to describe and explain the role that linguistic interaction plays in category construction and communication, by looking at naturally occurring data of spoken language. First, it will be argued that there is a way of building categories that is inherently interactional and indexical, namely ad hoc categorization. Ad hoc categorization will be defined as a bottom-up exemplar driven process, that is dependent on context for both its construction and its interpretation, and crucially relies on non-exhaustivity and exemplification. After a brief overview of the linguistic strategies that may encode ad hoc categorization, we will concentrate on linguistic interaction, taking the perspective of so-called languaging. It will be shown that categorization is frequently instrumental to intersubjective aims, such as mutual agreement, negotiation, and the general management of the speakers’ reciprocal positioning. In turn, it is collaboration between the interlocutors that allows to fine-tune categorization and achieve mutual understanding. Finally, we will focus on the incrementality of ad hoc categorization in interaction along two dimensions, namely, the identification of the category borders and the progressive anchoring of the category to the interlocutors’ experience.
Keywords: ad hoc categorization, exemplification, non-exhaustive connectives, general extenders, languaging, indexicality, linguistic interaction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The indexicality of categorization
    • 2.1Ad hoc categorization and the role of context
    • 2.2The linguistic expression of ad hoc categorization
  • 3.The languaging perspective: Category construction in interaction
  • 4.Incremental ad hoc categorization: Zooming in and outside categories in discourse
    • 4.1Identifying the category core and pushing the category borders
    • 4.2Beyond the borders: Ad hoc categorization of the outside
    • 4.3Progressive zoom into the interlocutors’ experience
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.220.02mau
References (59)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. The Manambu Language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward Keenan. 1985. Deixis. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Fieldwork vol. III, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arcodia, Giorgio F. & Mauri, Caterina. 2020. Exemplar-based compounds: The case of Chinese. Language Sciences 81: 101232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira & Mauri, Caterina. 2018. Why use or? Linguistics 56(5): 939–993. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan (eds). 2011. Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barotto, Allesandra & Mauri, Caterina. 2018. Constructing lists to construct categories. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30: 95–134.Google Scholar
Barotto, Allesandra. 2021. Exemplification and Categorization: The Case of Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barotto, Allesandra & Lo Baido, Maria Cristina. 2021. Exemplification in interaction: from reformulation to the creation of common ground. In Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic Resources at Work, Caterina Mauri, Eugenio Goria & Ilaria Fiorentini (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11(3): 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Deriving categories to achieve goals. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Gordon H. Bower (ed.), 1–64. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2003. Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 513–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Ad hoc categories. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, Patrick Colm Hogan (ed.), 87–88. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Becker, Alton L. 1988. Language in particular: A lecture. In Linguistics in Context, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 17–35. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1991. Language and languaging. Language and Communication 11(2): 33–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Kay, Paul. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2015. Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul (eds). 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 2007. Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11: 155–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowley, Stephen J. 2007. How human infants deal with symbol grounding. Interaction Studies 8(1): 83–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan D. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael & Moravcsik, Edith. 2013. The associative plural. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Ch. 36. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (22 March 2021).
Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English. <[URL]> (22 March 2021).
Du Bois, John W. 2014. Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiorentini, Ilaria & Miola, Emanuele. 2020. Disjunctive/conjunctive/whatever: The development of Italian barra (‘slash’) as a non-exhaustive connective. Language Sciences 81: 101234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 2014. Non-concatenative derivation. Reduplication. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 169–189. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kuperschmidt, Itai. (2018). Alternative relations and higher level categories. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 125–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lidz, Jefferey. 2000. Echo Reduplication in Kannada: Implications for a theory of word formation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 145–166.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lo Baido, Maria Cristina. 2018. Categorization via exemplification: Evidence from Italian. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta. 2018. Collective suffixes and ad hoc categories: From Latin -ālia to Italian -aglia. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 201–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maturana, Humberto R. 1983. What is it to see? (¿Qué es ver?). Archivos de Biología y Medicina Experimentales 16(3–4): 255–269.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2017. Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman-Tame & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 297–326. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina, Ballarè, Silvia, Goria, Eugenio, Cerruti, Massimo & Suriano, Francesco. 2019. KIParla corpus: A new resource for spoken Italian. In Proceedings of the 6th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it, Raffaela Bernardi, Roberto Navigli & Giovanni Semeraro (eds). <[URL]> (22 March 2021).
Mauri, Caterina, Goria, Eugenio & Fiorentini, Ilaria. 2019. Non-exhaustive lists in spoken language: A construction grammatical perspective. Constructions and Frames 11(2): 290–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea. 2018. Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: Theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2020. Ad Hoc Categorization and Language: The Construction of Ad Hoc Categories in Discourse. Special issue of Language Sciences 81.Google Scholar
. 2019. Nouns & co. Converging evidence in the analysis of associative plurals. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 72: 603–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. Heterogeneous sets: A diachronic typology of associative and similative plurals. Linguistic Typology. DOI logo
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Raimondi, Vincenzo. 2019. The bio-logic of languaging and its epistemological background. Language Sciences 71: 19–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor H. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975. Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology 7: 532–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steffensen, Sune Vork. 2009. Language, languaging, and the extended mind hypothesis. Pragmatics and Cognition 17: 677–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Distributed language and dialogism: Notes on non-locality, sense-making and interactivity. Language Sciences 50: 105–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas. 2008. Total reduplication vs. echo-word formation in language contact situations. In Language Contact and Contact Languages [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 7], Peter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds), 107–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, Merrill. 2006. Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In Advanced Language Learning: The Contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky, Heidi Byrnes (ed.), 95–108. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, Merrill & Watanabe, Yuko. 2013. Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), 3218–3225. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thibault, Paul J. 2017. The reflexivity of human languaging and Nigel Love’s two orders of language. Language Sciences 61: 74–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voghera, Miriam, Iacobini, Claudio, Savy, Renata, Cutugno, Francesco, De Rosa, Aurelio & Alfano, Iolanda. 2014. VoLIP: A Searchable Italian Spoken Corpus, in Complex Visibles Out There. In Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium: Language Use and Linguistic Structure, Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds), 628–640. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam. 2017. Dal parlato alla grammatica. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2008. Encoding exhaustivity. USTWPL 4: 133–143.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Barotto, Alessandra & Caterina Mauri
2022. Non-exhaustive connectives. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:2 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Fedriani, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
2022. Managing turns, building common ground, planning discourse. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2 ► pp. 347 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.