Chapter published in:
Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work
Edited by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria
[Studies in Language Companion Series 220] 2021
► pp. 239270
References

References

Auer, Peter
2009On-line syntax. Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1): 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baesler, James E. & Burgoon, Judee K.
1994The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research 21: 582–602. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barotto, Alessandra
2018The role of exemplification in the construction of categories: The case of Japanese. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 37–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021Exemplification and Categorization. The Case of Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barotto, Alessandra & Mauri, Caterina
2018Constructing lists to construct categories. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30: 95–134.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1983Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11(3): 211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
1995I segnali discorsivi. In Grande Grammatica italiana di consultazione. III Tipi di frase, deissi, formazione delle parole, Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds), 225–257. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S., Goodnow, Jacqueline J. & Austin, George A.
1956A study of thinking. New York NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
2007Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Calaresu, Emilia M.
2016Dialogicità e grammatica. In Dinamiche dell’interazione: Testo, dialogo, applicazioni educative, Cecilia Andorno & Roberta Grassi (eds), 13–27. Milano: Collana “Studi AItLA”.Google Scholar
2018Grammaticalizzazioni polifoniche o “verticali” e sintassi dialogica. Dagli enunciati-eco ai temi sospesi: l’infinito anteposto in strutture del tipo “mangiare, mangio”. In Strutture e dinamismi della variazione e del cambiamento linguistico. Atti del Convegno DIA III, Napoli, 24–27 novembre 2014, Paolo Greco, Cesarina Vecchia & Rosanna Sornicola (eds), 505–521. Napoli: Accademia di Archeologia, Lettere e Belle Arti, Società Nazionale di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti in Napoli: Giannini editore.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna
1994Vague Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Brennan, Susan E.
1991Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, Stephanie D. Teasley (eds), 127–149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna
1986Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22(1): 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Schaefer, Edward F.
1989Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 13(2): 259–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan D.
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, Alan D.
1990Prototype theory and lexical semantics. In Meaning and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization, Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), 382–402. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth
2014‘So very fast then’. Discourse markers at left and right periphery in spoken French. In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds), 151–178. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio, Mancini, Federico, Vedovelli, Massimo & Voghera, Miriam
1993Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milan: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2014Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2006Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2): 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara
2013Vagueness Markers in Contemporary Italian: Intergenerational Variation and Pragmatic Change. PhD dissertation, Bergamo University.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goria, Eugenio & Mauri, Caterina
2018Il corpus KIParla: Una nuova risorsa per lo studio dell’italiano parlato. In CLUB Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2, Francesca Masini & Fabio Tamburini (eds), 96–116. Bologna: Circolo Linguistico dell’Università di Bologna (CLUB).Google Scholar
Grice, Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaia
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2016A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences (54): 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2013On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R.
1979Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3(1): 67–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hovy, Eduard & Maier, Elisabeth
1994Parsimonious and profligate: How many and which discourse structure relations? Ms. https://​bit​.ly​/2UCA7Xf> (4 March 2019).
Hyland, Ken
2007Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academia discourse. Applied Linguistics 28 (2): 266–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M.
1983Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14: 41–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lo Baido, Maria Cristina
2018Categorization via exemplification: Evidence from Italian. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 69–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longacre, Robert E.
1983The Grammar of Discourse. New York NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1998Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 8(3): 243–281.Google Scholar
Manzotti, Emilio
1998L’esempio. Natura, definizioni, problemi. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 5: 99–123.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca & Pietrandrea, Paola
2010Magari. Cognitive Linguistics 21: 75–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina
2017Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman-Tame & Cristopher Laenzlinger (eds), 297–326. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molinelli, Piera
2014“Sai cosa ti dico? Non lo so, se non me lo dici”. Sapere come segnale pragmatico nell’italiano parlato contemporaneo. In Dall’architettura della lingua italiana all’architettura linguistica dell’Italia. Saggi in omaggio a Heidi Siller-Runggaldier, Paul Danler & Christine Konecny (eds), 487–501. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Prandi, Michele
2006Le regole e le scelte. Introduzione alla grammatica italiana. UTET Universtà.Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
1990Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Abruñeiras, Paula
2015Exemplifying Markers in English: Synchronic and Diachronic Considerations. PhD dissertation, Santiago de Compostela University.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1973Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977Human Categorization. In Advances in Cross-Cultural Psychology, Neil Warren (ed.), 1–72. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1978Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds), 27–48. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail & Sacks, Harvey
1977The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schober, Michael F. & Clark, Herbert H.
1989Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology 21(2): 211–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Stefan
1999Il congiuntivo tra modalità e subordinazione. Uno studio sull’italiano parlato. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
2007Reduced parenthetical clauses in Romance languages – A pragmatic typology. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 237–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Linda B. & Samuelson, Larissa K.
1997Perceiving and remembering: Category stability, variability and development. In Knowledge, Concepts and Categories, Koen Lamberts & David Shanks (eds), 161–195. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam
2013A case study on the relationship between grammatical change and synchronic variation: The emergence of tipo[-N] in Italian. In Synchrony and Diachrony. A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 283–312. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yu-Fang, Tsai Pi-Hua, Goodman, David & Lin, Meng-Ying
2010Agreement, acknowledgment, and alignment: The discourse-pragmatic functions of hao and dui in Taiwan Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies 12(2): 241–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf
2002Exemplification theory of media influence. In Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, Jennings Bryant & Dolf Zillmann (eds), 19–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar