Chapter 9
Exemplification in interaction
From reformulation to the creation of common ground
The aim of this paper is to examine how
exemplification is used in real-time interactions to make reference to
conceptual categories. Based on real occurrences of spoken Italian, it
is shown that in conversations exemplification is used cooperatively
by different participants to perform several functions. Not only can
exemplification be used to present or expand the reference to a
category by both speaker and addressee, but it can also contribute to
the creation of a mutually accepted common ground (examples can be
employed to communicate that alignment has been reached or to
communicate how such alignment could be reached). Finally, we argue
that examples are part of a bigger picture of cooperative reference
construction, where speakers collaborate reformulating the reference
using different types of strategies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Exemplification in interaction and the creation of reference: Some theoretical premises
- 2.1The issue of making reference to conceptual categories
- 2.2The collaborative model of referring
- 2.3Exemplification in the creation of reference
- 3.Methodological remarks: Corpora, objects of analysis and parameters
- 4.Exemplification by the speaker: Presenting and refashioning the reference
- 5.Exemplification by the addressee: From collaborating to reference construction to interpersonal
functions
- 5.1Exemplifying to collaborate in the reference
construction
- 5.2Exemplifying to provide feedback on the reference
- 5.3Exemplifying to ask for feedback on the reference
- 6.Concluding remarks: Exemplification and the online creation of reference
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Auer, Peter
2009 On-line syntax. Thoughts on the temporality of
spoken language.
Language Sciences 31(1): 1–13.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baesler, James E. & Burgoon, Judee K.
1994 The temporal effects of story and statistical
evidence on belief change.
Communication Research 21: 582–602.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barotto, Alessandra
2018 The role of exemplification in the construction of
categories: The case of Japanese. In
Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc
Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives,
Caterina Mauri &
Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of
Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 37–68.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barotto, Alessandra
2021 Exemplification and Categorization. The Case of Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barotto, Alessandra & Mauri, Caterina
2018 Constructing lists to construct
categories.
Italian Journal of Linguistics 30: 95–134.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1983 Ad hoc categories.
Memory and Cognition 11(3): 211–227.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bazzanella, Carla
1995 I segnali discorsivi. In
Grande Grammatica italiana di consultazione. III Tipi di
frase, deissi, formazione delle parole,
Lorenzo Renzi,
Giampaolo Salvi &
Anna Cardinaletti (eds), 225–257. Bologna: Il Mulino.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and
Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruner, Jerome S., Goodnow, Jacqueline J. & Austin, George A.
1956 A study of thinking. New York NY: Wiley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caffi, Claudia
2007 Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Calaresu, Emilia M.
2016 Dialogicità e grammatica. In
Dinamiche dell’interazione: Testo, dialogo, applicazioni
educative,
Cecilia Andorno &
Roberta Grassi (eds), 13–27. Milano: Collana “Studi AItLA”.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Calaresu, Emilia M.
2018 Grammaticalizzazioni polifoniche o “verticali” e
sintassi dialogica. Dagli enunciati-eco ai temi sospesi:
l’infinito anteposto in strutture del tipo “mangiare,
mangio”. In
Strutture e dinamismi della variazione e del cambiamento
linguistico. Atti del Convegno DIA III, Napoli, 24–27
novembre 2014,
Paolo Greco,
Cesarina Vecchia &
Rosanna Sornicola (eds), 505–521. Napoli: Accademia di Archeologia, Lettere e Belle Arti, Società Nazionale di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti in Napoli: Giannini editore.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Channell, Joanna
1994 Vague Language. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using language. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. & Brennan, Susan E.
1991 Grounding in communication. In
Perspectives on socially shared cognition,
Lauren B. Resnick,
John M. Levine,
Stephanie D. Teasley (eds), 127–149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna
1986 Referring as a collaborative
process.
Cognition 22(1): 1–39.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. & Schaefer, Edward F.
1989 Contributing to discourse.
Cognitive Science 13(2): 259–294.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan D.
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruse, Alan D.
1990 Prototype theory and lexical
semantics. In
Meaning and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic
Categorization,
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), 382–402. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Degand, Liesbeth
2014 ‘So very fast then’. Discourse markers at left and
right periphery in spoken French. In
Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery:
Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language
Change,
Kate Beeching &
Ulrich Detges (eds), 151–178. Leiden: Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Mauro, Tullio, Mancini, Federico, Vedovelli, Massimo & Voghera, Miriam
1993 Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milan: Etaslibri.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W.
2014 Towards a dialogic syntax.
Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Kerstin
2006 Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghezzi, Chiara
2013 Vagueness Markers in Contemporary Italian:
Intergenerational Variation and Pragmatic
Change. PhD dissertation, Bergamo University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving
1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York NY: Doubleday.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goria, Eugenio & Mauri, Caterina
2018 Il corpus KIParla: Una nuova risorsa per lo studio
dell’italiano parlato. In
CLUB Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2,
Francesca Masini &
Fabio Tamburini (eds), 96–116. Bologna: Circolo Linguistico dell’Università di Bologna (CLUB).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. In
Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3:
Speech Acts,
Peter Cole &
Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaia
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haselow, Alexander
2016 A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the
final field in spoken syntax.
Language Sciences (54): 77–101.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd
2013 On discourse markers: Grammaticalization,
pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hobbs, Jerry R.
1979 Coherence and coreference.
Cognitive Science 3(1): 67–90.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hobbs, Jerry R.
1985 On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse. Stanford CA: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hovy, Eduard & Maier, Elisabeth
1994 Parsimonious and profligate: How many and which
discourse structure relations? Ms.
[URL]> (
4 March 2019).
Hyland, Ken
2007 Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating
in academia discourse.
Applied Linguistics 28 (2): 266–285.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levelt, Willem J. M.
1983 Monitoring and self-repair in
speech.
Cognition 14: 41–104.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lo Baido, Maria Cristina
2018 Categorization via exemplification: Evidence from
Italian. In
Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc
Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives,
Caterina Mauri &
Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of
Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 69–95.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longacre, Robert E.
1983 The Grammar of Discourse. New York NY: Plenum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1998 Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional
theory of text organization.
Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of
Discourse 8(3): 243–281.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzotti, Emilio
1998 L’esempio. Natura, definizioni,
problemi.
Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 5: 99–123.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Masini, Francesca & Pietrandrea, Paola
2010 Magari.
Cognitive Linguistics 21: 75–121.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mauri, Caterina
2017 Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A
linguistic analysis. In
Formal Models in the Study of Language,
Joanna Blochowiak,
Cristina Grisot,
Stephanie Durrleman-Tame &
Cristopher Laenzlinger (eds), 297–326. Berlin: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molinelli, Piera
2014 “Sai cosa ti dico? Non lo so, se non me lo dici”.
Sapere come segnale pragmatico nell’italiano parlato
contemporaneo. In
Dall’architettura della lingua italiana all’architettura
linguistica dell’Italia. Saggi in omaggio a Heidi
Siller-Runggaldier,
Paul Danler &
Christine Konecny (eds), 487–501. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Overstreet, Maryann
1999 Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General
Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prandi, Michele
2006 Le regole e le scelte. Introduzione alla grammatica
italiana. UTET Universtà.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Redeker, Gisela
1990 Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse
structure.
Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367–381.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodríguez Abruñeiras, Paula
2015 Exemplifying Markers in English: Synchronic and
Diachronic Considerations. PhD dissertation, Santiago de Compostela University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, Eleanor
1973 Natural categories.
Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–50.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, Eleanor
1977 Human Categorization. In
Advances in Cross-Cultural Psychology,
Neil Warren (ed.), 1–72. London: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, Eleanor
1978 Principles of categorization. In
Cognition and Categorization,
Eleanor Rosch &
Barbara B. Lloyd (eds), 27–48. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail & Sacks, Harvey
1977 The preference for self-correction in the
organization of repair in conversation.
Language 53: 361–382.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schober, Michael F. & Clark, Herbert H.
1989 Understanding by addressees and
overhearers.
Cognitive Psychology 21(2): 211–232.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, Stefan
1999 Il congiuntivo tra modalità e subordinazione. Uno studio
sull’italiano parlato. Roma: Carocci.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Linda B. & Samuelson, Larissa K.
1997 Perceiving and remembering: Category stability,
variability and development. In
Knowledge, Concepts and Categories,
Koen Lamberts &
David Shanks (eds), 161–195. Hove: Psychology Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Yu-Fang, Tsai Pi-Hua, Goodman, David & Lin, Meng-Ying
2010 Agreement, acknowledgment, and alignment: The
discourse-pragmatic functions of hao and dui in Taiwan
Mandarin conversation.
Discourse Studies 12(2): 241–267.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zillmann, Dolf
2002 Exemplification theory of media
influence. In
Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research,
Jennings Bryant &
Dolf Zillmann (eds), 19–41. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.