Cover not available
Part of
Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work
Edited by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria
[Studies in Language Companion Series 220] 2021
► pp. 295–316

Chapter 11
Et cetera, eccetera, etc. The development of a general extender from Latin to Italian

| Università degli Studi di Pavia
| Università di Bologna
This paper discusses the range of functions of et cetera in Latin, as well as the multifunctionality and evolution of eccetera in Italian. Both forms pertain to the category of general extenders, i.e. markers whose main function is to ‘extend’ otherwise grammatically complete utterances. We will propose a qualitative analysis based on data from Latin, Old Italian, and contemporary written and spoken Italian. In particular, we will discuss the semantic-pragmatic expansion of et cetera and eccetera, highlighting how both expressions tend to develop intersubjective and procedural meanings in addition to their original functions. Moreover, since the original components of eccetera are by now blurred in contemporary Italian, we will show how recent developments allow its use in disjunctive contexts.
Keywords: general extenders, Latin, Italian, intersubjectivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Et cetera in Latin
    • 2.1Functions of et cetera
      • 2.1.1Completing lists and marking sets
      • 2.1.2Sharing knowledge and building categories
      • 2.1.3Pragmatic and interpersonal functions
    • 2.2The evolution of et cetera
  • 3.From Latin to Italian
    • 3.1Previous studies on Italian eccetera
    • 3.2Functions of eccetera in contemporary spoken Italian
      • 3.2.1‘There is more’: Completing lists and building categories
      • 3.2.2‘You know what i mean’: Indexing shared knowledge
      • 3.2.3‘There are alternatives’: Disjunctive uses
    • 3.3Recent developments
  • 4.Discussion and conclusive remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.220.11fio
References (42)
References
Ariel, Mira & Mauri, Caterina. 2018. Why use or? Linguistics 56(5): 939–993. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barotto, Alessandra. 2018. The role of exemplification in the construction of categories: The case of Japanese. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 37–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11(3): 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Béguelin, Marie-José & Corminboeuf Gilles. 2017. Ou comme ça, machin et autres marqueurs d’indétermination dans les listes. Discours 20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 2007. Discourse variation, grammaticalization, and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2): 155–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortés Rodríguez, Luis. 2006. Los elementos de final de serie enumerativa en el discurso oral. Investigaçoes 19(2): 9–36.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan D. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cucchi, Costanza. 2010. Vague expressions in the European Parliament: A marker of cultural identity? In Discourse, Identities and Roles in Specialized Communication, Giuliana Garzone & James Archibald (eds), 85–107. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio, Mancini, Federico, Vedovelli, Massimo & Voghera, Miriam. 1993. Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milano: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R. (1980). Variation in discourse: ‘And stuff like that’. Language in Society 9(1): 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2): 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2014. Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiorentini, Ilaria. 2018. Eccetera eccetera e così via di seguito. I general extenders dell’italiano contemporaneo. CLUB Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 20–39.Google Scholar
. 2019. E le rimanenti cose. Eccetera tra reticenza e inferenza. In Spazi bianchi. Le espressioni letterarie, linguistiche e visive dell’assenza, Alfonsina Buoniconto, Gerardo Salvati & Raffaele Cesaro (eds), 249–260. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, Ilaria & Sansò, Andrea. 2019. Reformulation markers and their functions. Two case studies from Italian. Journal of Pragmatics 120: 54–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galli de’ Paratesi, Nora. 1969. Le brutte parole. Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara. 2013. Vagueness Markers in Contemporary Italian: Intergenerational Variation and Pragmatic Change. PhD Dissertation, Università di Pavia.Google Scholar
Goria, Eugenio & Mauri, Caterina. 2018. Il corpus KIParla: Una nuova risorsa per lo studio dell’italiano parlato. In CLUB Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2, Francesca Masini & Fabio Tamburini (eds), 96–116. Bologna: Circolo Linguistico dell’Università di Bologna (CLUB).Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guil, Pura. 1999. Proformas alusivas en lengua oral. In Linguistica testuale comparativa. In Memoriam Maria-Elisabeth Conte, Gunver Skytte & Francesco Sabatini (eds), 89–98. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Hand, Ferdinand G. 1832. Tursellinus seu de particulis Latinis commentarii, Vol. II. Leipzig: Weidemann.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998a. The Function of Discourse Markers. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998b. The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104: 235–260.Google Scholar
. 2006. A dynamic polysemy approach to the lexical semantics of discourse markers (with an exemplary analysis of French toujours). In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 21–46. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. Grammaticalization (2nd edn). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List-construction as a task and resource. In Interaction Competence, George Psathas (ed.), 63–92. Washington DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 57–139. Austin TX: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta. 2019. General extenders in Latin. In Lemmata linguistica Latina, Vol. 2: Clause and Discourse. Proceedings of the 19th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics (Munich April 24–28, 2017), Lidewij van Gils, Caroline Kroon & Rodie Risselada (eds), 697–714. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2014. What do connectives and plurals have in common? The linguistic expression of ad hoc categories. In Linguistic Papers Dedicated to Jacques Moeschler, Joanna Blochowiak, Stéphanie Durrlemann-Tame, Cristina Grisot & Christopher C. Laenzlinger (eds), 1–21. Genève: Université de Genève.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne. 2004. ‘Like the wise virgins and all that jazz’: Using a corpus to examine vague categorization and shared knowledge. Language and Computers 52(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, Candlelight and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pichler, Heike & Levey, Stephen. 2011. In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: General extenders in northeast England. English Language and Linguistics 15: 441–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2006. A functional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 77–99. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Prandi, Michele. 1990. Una figura testuale del silenzio: La reticenza. In Dimensioni della linguistica, Maria-Elisabeth Conte, Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paolo Ramat (eds.), 217–239. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1972. On the analyzability of stories by children. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, John Gumperz & Dell Hymes (eds.), 325–345. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Tombeur, Paul (ed.). 2013. LLT-Series A. Library of Latin Texts. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam. 2012. Chitarre, violino, banjo e cose del genere. In Per Tullio De Mauro. Studi offerti dalle allieve in occasione del suo 80°compleanno, Anna M. Thornton & Miriam Voghera (eds), 341–364. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam, Iacobini, Claudio, Savy, Renata, Cutugno, Francesco, De Rosa, Aurelio & Alfano, Iolanda. 2014. VoLIP: A searchable Italian spoken corpus. In Complex visibles out there. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium: Language Use and Linguistic Structure, Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds), 628–640. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pecorari, Filippo
2022. I general extenders nel testo scritto, tra lessico e punteggiatura. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 57:2 ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.