Cover not available
Part of
Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work
Edited by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria
[Studies in Language Companion Series 220] 2021
► pp. 317–354

Chapter 12
Morphopragmatics of rhyming and imitative co-compounds in Russian

| Sapienza University of Roma
| Roma Tre University

Coordinative compounding is a phenomenon at the crossroads between word-formation, syntax and discourse, adopted for encoding non-lexicalized concepts in a wide range of languages. We propose a morphopragmatic account of two specific coordinative compounding strategies in Russian, namely, rhyming and imitative co-compounds. They exhibit non-compositional semantics, inasmuch as they perform a generalizing/categorizing function, which, in turn, is tightly intertwined with a strong pragmatic evaluative component, involving irony and downgrading of the referent. Furthermore, different means of categorization tend to cluster in discourse, thus resulting in pervasive overcoding of the respective ad hoc concepts. Since categorization is a result of an online process of meaning negotiation between speakers, we have to do with low-frequency single instances of a frequent phenomenon.

Keywords: coordinative compounding, rhyming co-compounds, imitative co-compounds
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Co-compounds and their morphosyntactic properties in Russian
    • 1.2Data, theoretical framework, and scope of the study
  • 2.Rhyming co-compounds
    • 2.1The appositive subtype
    • 2.2The prefixed subtype
  • 3.Imitative co-compounds
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.220.12ale
References
Aarts, Bas
2007 Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Arcodia, Giorgio F., Grandi, Nicola & Montermini, Fabio
2009 Hierarchical NN compounds in a cross-linguistic perspective. Italian Journal of Linguistics 21(1): 11–33.Google Scholar
Armoskaite, Solveiga & Kutlu, Deniz Aysegul
2014 Turkish m-reduplication: A case of similative plural. Turkic Languages 18(1–2): 271–288.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
1993 On frequency, transparency, and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1983 Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11: 211–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11: 629–654.Google Scholar
Belikov, Vladimir N.
1990 Produktivnaja model’ povtora v russkom jazyke (variant dlja obsuždenija) (A productive model of repetition in Russian (data for discussion)). Russian Linguistics 14(1): 81–86.Google Scholar
Benigni, Valentina
2016 Le marche di lista in russo. Segnali riformulativi, estensivi, generalizzanti…i vse takoe . In Le lingue slave tra struttura e uso, Valentina Benigni, Lucyna Gebert & Julija Nikolaeva (eds), 17–43. Firenze: Firenze University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018  Ad hoc categorization in Russian and multifunctional general extenders. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 97–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benko, Vladimír
2014 Aranea: Yet another family of (comparable) web corpora. In Text, Speech and Dialogue. 17th International Conference, Brno, Czech Republic, September 8–12, 2014, Petr Sojka, Aleš Horák, Ivan Kopeček & Karel Pala (eds), 247–256. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta & Scalise, Sergio
2005 The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 4(2): 319–332.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2010 Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110: 295–321. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirikba, Viacheslav A.
2008 The problem of the Caucasian Sprachbund. In From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 90], Pieter, Muyksen (ed.), 25–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1983 Hierarchies, Targets, and Controllers: Agreement Patterns in Slavic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Nikolaeva, Irina
2006 Syntax of natural and accidental coordination: Evidence from agreement. Language 82(4): 824–849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Barbaresi, Lavinia M.
1994 Morphopragmatics in inflection. In Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Lavinia M. Barbaresi (eds), 58–83. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1985 Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 12: 222–254.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2011 The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1): 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura A., Endresen, Anna, Kuznetsova, Julia, Lyashevskaya, Olga, Makarova, Anastasia, Nesset, Tore & Sokolova, Svetlana
2013 Why Russian Aspectual Prefixes Aren’t Empty: Prefixes as Verb Classifiers. Bloomington IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. & Nesset, Tore
2010 Taking apart Russian raz-. The Slavic and East European Journal 54(3): 477–502.Google Scholar
Josephson, Folke
2015 Grammaticalization paths of verbal prefixes in Slavic and other Indo-European branches. Scando-Slavica 61(2): 283–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krongauz, Maksim A.
1998 Pristavki i glagoly v russkom jazyke: Semantičeskaja grammatika (Prefixes and verbs in Russian: Semantic grammar). Moskva: Škola “Jazyki russkoj kul’tury”.Google Scholar
Kukhto, Anton & Piperski, Alexander
2017  Xuj-Reduplication in Russian. Paper presented at the 14th Old World Conference in Phonology (OCP14), Düsseldorf, Germany, February 20 –22, 2017.
Le Bruyn, Bert, Que, Min & de Swart, Henriëtte
2012 The scope of bare nominals. In Genericity, Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade & Fabio Del Prete (eds), 116–139. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipec, Rachil’ S.
1939 Vvodnaja stat’ja (Introductory article). In Byliny M.S. Krjukovoj, Èrna G. Borodina & Rachil S. Lipec (eds) 1–48. Moskva: Gosudarstvennyj literaturnyj muzej.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca, Mauri, Caterina & Pietrandrea, Paola
2018 List constructions: Towards a unified account. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 49–94.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea
2018 Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: Theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1):1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minlos, Philip R.
2004 Reduplikacija i parnye slova v vostočnoslavjanskich jazykach (Reduplication and pair words in East Slavic languages). Candidate’s degree dissertation, Rossijskaja akademija nauk, Moskva.Google Scholar
Pacsai, Imre
2013 Vostočnye èlementy russkoj narodnoj reči (leksika i derivacija) (The eastern elements in the russian folk speech (vocabulary and derivation)). Folia Linguistica Rossica 9: 43–56.Google Scholar
Plotnikova, Anna M.
2012 Parnye sočetanija v sovremennom russkom jazyke i ich kreativnyj potencial (Pair word combinations in Modern Russian and their creative potential). Ural’skij Filologičeskij Vestnik 2: 183–187.Google Scholar
Rozhanskiy, Fedor I.
2015 Two semantic patterns of reduplication. Iconicity revisited. In The Why and How of Total Reduplication: Current Issues and New Perspectives, Daniela Rossi (ed.). Special issue of Studies in Language 39(4): 992–1018.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta
2011 The classification of compounds. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 34–53. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas
2008 Total reduplication vs. echo-word formation in language contact situations. In Language Contact and Contact Languages [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 7], Peter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds), 107–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tkačenko, Orest B.
1979 Sopostavitel’no-istoričeskaja frazeologija slavjanskich i finnougrorskich jazykov (Comparative-historical phraseology of Slavic and Finno-Ugric languages). Kiev: Naukova dumka.Google Scholar
Voinov, Vitaly
2012 Rhyming reduplication in Russian paired words. Russian Linguistics 36(2): 175–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
2005 Co-compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Dennis
1973 Appositional compounds in Russian. The Slavonic and East European Review 51(122): 1–10.Google Scholar
Weiss, Daniel
1993 Dvojnye glagoly v sovremennom russkom jazyke (Double verbs in Modern Russian). In Kategorja skazuemogo v slavjanskix jazykax: Modal’nost’ i aktualizacija (The category of predicate in Slavic Languages: Modality and actualization) [Slavistische Beiträge 305], Francesca Fici Giusti & Simonetta Signorini (eds), 67–97. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
2013a Dvojnye glagoly v russkoj razgovornoj reči v zerkale Nacional’nogo korpusa: formy imperativa množestvennogo čisla (Double verbs in Colloquial Russianon on the basis of data from the National Corpus: Imperative plural forms). In Schweizerische Beiträge zum XV. Internat. Slavistenkongress in Minsk, August 2013, Ekaterina Vel’mezova (ed.), 319–341. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2013b Russian double verbs in the 1st pl Imperative. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 85: 165–175.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike & Polat, Nilgin Tanis
2016 Pejoration in contact: m-reduplication and other examples from urban German. In Pejoration [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 228], Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer & Heike Wiese (eds), 243–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Carston, Robyn
2007 A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Pragmatics, Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 230–259. Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar