Cover not available
Part of
English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective: Current issues
Edited by Lotte Sommerer and Evelien Keizer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 221] 2022
► pp. 205–234

Constructional variation and change in N-is focaliser constructions

| University of Zurich
This paper revisits the emergence of N-is focaliser constructions. It is the first to systematically use qualitative evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) and Early English Books Online (EEBO) to establish the chronology of developments from a full clause to a parenthetical. In a second step, diachronic evidence from the Late Modern English Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) is used for a quantitative, variationist study of constructional change in the Late Modern period. The relevant stages for this are determined in a bottom-up fashion, using Variability-based Neighbour Clustering (VNC). Multivariate statistical modelling is then applied to model the relative importance of predictor variables for the degree of syntactic integration. The chronological data from the OED and EEBO provide evidence of lexical diffusion from truth is and various other shell nouns to problem is. COHA data further show N-is focalisers to be spreading in discourse frequency. The variationist evidence shows that punctuation is not the most important predictor variable throughout and that it interacts in interesting ways with other predictors. Finally, relatively minor (i.e. numerically infrequent) but conceptually salient changes (such as article omission) are taken to contribute to further constructionalisation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Previous research on the history of N-is constructions
    • 2.2Aims and hypotheses
  • 3.Constructionalisation: Qualitative evidence
  • 4.Modelling constructional change: Methodology
    • 4.1Data retrieval and manual post editing
    • 4.2Predictor variables
    • 4.3Statistical modelling
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Stages in the development of N-is constructions
    • 5.2Constructional change
      • 5.2.1Summary statistics
      • 5.2.2Multifactorial modelling
    • 5.3Summary
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Databases cited
  • Appendix
Published online: 21 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.221.06hun
References
Aijmer, Karin
2007 The interface between discourse and grammar: The fact is that. In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks [Benjamins Current Topics 92], Agnès Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 31–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
2008 The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2006 Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. Constructions Online 1(7): 1–28.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne
2012 Revisiting the reduplicative copula with corpus-based evidence. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 211–221. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John & Forest, Richard
2015 Signalling Nouns in English: A Corpus-based Discourse Approach. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Hilpert, Martin
2008 The identification of stages in diachronic data: variability-based neighbor clustering. Corpora 3(1): 59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013 Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Gries, Stefan T.
2009 Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24(4): 385–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2018 It is time that this (should) be studied across a broader range of Englishes: A global trip around mandative subjunctives. In Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the Interplay of Emancipation and Globalization of ESL Varieties [Varieties of English Around the World G61], Sandra Dehors (ed.), 217–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, David Denison and Gerold Schneider
2012 Relative complexity in scientific discourse. English Language and Linguistics 16(2): 209–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Oppliger, Rahel
Accepted. (The) fact is … /(Die) Tatsache ist … focaliser constructions in English and German are similar but subject to different constraints. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.
Keizer, Evelien
2016 The (the) fact is (that) construction in English and Dutch. In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009 Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane
1999 Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what’s the right analysis? English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 335–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina
1998 Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Perek, Florent
2012 Alternation-based generalizations are stored in the mental grammar: Evidence from a sorting task experiment. Cognitive Linguistics 23(3): 601–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philipp, Michael, Zeileis, Achim & Strobl, Carolin
2016 A toolkit for stability assessment of tree-based learners. In Proceedings of COMPSTAT 2016 – 22nd International Conference on Computational Statistics, Ana Colubi, Angela Blanco & Cristian Gatu (eds), 315–325. The Hague: The International Statistical Institute/International Association for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
1998 Constant and ephemeral hypostatization: thing, problem and other “shell nouns”. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists, Bernard Caron (ed.), Paris, July 22–25 1997, CD-ROM, Elsevier, [URL]> (2 July 2021).
2000 English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2014 On the development of the point is and related issues in American English. English Linguistics 31(1): 79–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 On the grammaticalization of the thing is and related issues in the history of American English. In Studies in the History of the English Language, VI: Evidence and Method in Histories of English, Michael Adams, Laurel Brinton, & Robert D. Fulk (eds), 99–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Malley, James & Tutz, Gerhard
2009a Introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging and random forests. Psychological Methods 14(4): 323–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Hothorn, Torsten & Zeileis, Achim
2009b Party on! A new, conditional variable-important measure for random forests available in the party package. The R Journal 1(2): 14–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stvan, Laurel Smith
2014 Truth is, sentence-initial shell nouns are showing up bare. In Complex Visibles Out There. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistic Colloquium 2014: Language Use and Linguistic Structure, Ludmila Veselovskà & Markéta Janebová (eds), 591–606. Olomouc: Placký University.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
2016 Teen Talk. The Language of Adolescents. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Baayen, Harald
2012 Models, forests, and trees of York English: was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24: 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tárnyiková, Jarmila
2018 Constructions with shell nouns in English: Their dual role in information packaging. Caplletra 64: 205–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2015 Investigating ‘periphery’ from a functionalist perspective. Linguistic Vanguard 1(1): 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2008 Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Constructional Approaches to English Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds), 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tuggy, David
1996 The thing is is that people talk that way. The question is why? In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods. The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, Eugene H. Casad (ed.), 713–752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Databases cited

ARCHER
A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers (version 3.2)
CLMET
Corpus of Late Modern English Texts
COCA
The Corpus of Contemporary American English ([URL])
COHA
Corpus of Historical American English ([URL])
EEBO
Early English Books Online ([URL])
OED online
Oxford English Dictionary online ([URL])
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hundt, Marianne
2022. N-isFocalizers as Semi-fixed Constructions: Modeling Variation across World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 50:2 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Pinson, Mathilde
2022. The (inter)subjectification of bottom line phrases. Lingvisticae Investigationes 45:2 ► pp. 276 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.