Premodification in X-is constructions
Fact and point
Although most studies on the X-is construction (thing-is, fact-is, point-is, etc.) acknowledge that premodification is allowed, very little attention has been paid to this property of the construction. Focusing on instances with the head nouns fact and point, this paper seeks to find out which premodifiers can be found in these constructions, and how the development of the construction from a fully specificational copular sentence with a referential subject NP to a non-specificational semi-fixed focus marker affects the type and range of premodifiers allowed. On the basis of data from the British National Corpus (Davies 2004), a number of tendencies and restrictions are identified in terms of (i) token and type frequencies of the premodifiers, as well as type-token-ratio (TTR), and (ii) the class and function of the premodifiers. It is concluded that, as constructionalization takes place, the premodifier position becomes constrained. In addition, it is shown that non-specificational constructions clearly prefer subjective modifiers, which, due to an increase in scope, come to serve a different function (e.g. attitudinal, intensifying, or downtoning). It is argued that the changes observed follow from the gradual changes taking place in the internal structure of the constructions in question. Finally, the theory of Functional Discourse Grammar is used to capture these changes and to explain the consequences of these changes both for the fact-is and point-is constructions in general and for the classes of premodifiers allowed (or preferred).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Preliminaries
- 3.The fact-is and point-is constructions
- 3.1Function and form
- 3.2Specificational vs. non-specificational constructions
- 4.Premodification in the fact-is and point-is constructions
- 4.1Premodification patterns for fact and point
- 4.1.1Most frequent premodifiers
- 4.1.2Classes of premodifiers
- 4.2Correlation between premodifier and construction type
- 4.2.1Premodifier vs. construction type: Fact
- 4.2.2Premodifier vs. construction type: Point
- 4.3Summary
- 5.FDG analysis
- 5.1Introduction to FDG
- 5.1.1Overall characterization
- 5.1.2Levels of analysis
- 5.1.2.1The Interpersonal Level
- 5.1.2.2The Representational Level
- 5.1.2.3The Morphosyntactic Level
- 5.2Premodification in constructions with fact and point
- 5.2.1Fact/point as fully lexical nouns
- 5.2.2The fact-is and point-is constructions as focus-cum-contrast markers
- 5.2.3The fact-is and point-is constructions as focality markers
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Corpus
-
Appendix
References
Bache, Carl
2000 Essentials of Mastering English: A Concise Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bellert, Irena
1977 On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs.
Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 337–50.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Brems, Lieselotte
2011 Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brems, Lieselotte & Davidse, Kristin
2010 The grammaticalisation of nominal type noun constructions with kind/sort of: Chronology and paths of change.
English Studies 91(2): 180–202.
Brenier, Jason M. & Michaelis, Laura A.
2005 Optimization via syntactic amalgam: Syntax-prosody mismatch and copula doubling.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 45–88.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
2006 Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP.
Davidse, Kristin
2009 Complete and sort of: From identifying to intensifying? Transactions of the Philological Society 107(3): 262–292.
Declerck, Renaat
1988 Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudoclefts. Leuven: Leuven University Press/Fortis Publications.
Ernst, Thomas
2002 The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.
Feist, Jim
2009 Premodifier order in English nominal phrases: A semantic account.
Cognitive Linguistics 20(2): 301–340.
Feist, Jim
2012 Premodifiers in English: Their Structure and Significance. Cambridge: CUP.
Flowerdew, John & Forest, Richard W.
2015 Signalling Nouns in English: A Corpus-Based Discourse Approach. Cambridge: CUP.
Ghesquière, Lobke
2014 The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2014 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn, revised by
Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge.
Hengeveld, Kees
1989 Layers and operators in Functional Discourse Grammar.
Journal of Linguistics 25(1): 127–157.
Hengeveld, Kees
1997 Adverbs in Functional Grammar. In
Toward a Functional Lexicology,
Gerd Wotjak (ed.), 126–136. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Hengeveld, Kees
2017 A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In
The grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective,
Kees Hengeveld,
Heiko Narrog &
Hella Olbertz (eds), 13–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Higgins, Francis R.
1979 The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. New York NY: Garland.
Jackendoff, Ray S.
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Keizer, Evelien
2007 The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Categorization. Cambridge: CUP.
Keizer, Evelien
2013 The X is (is) construction: An FDG account. In
Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [
Studies in Language Companion Series 137],
J. Lachlan Mackenzie &
Hella Olbertz (eds), 213–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keizer, Evelien
2019 The problem of non-truth-conditional, lower-level modifiers: A Functional Discourse Grammar solution.
English Language and Linguistics 24(2), 365–392.
Kroon, Carolien
1995 Discourse Particles in Latin. Amsterdam: Gieben.
Massam, Diana
1999 Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what’s the right analysis? English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 335–352.
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina
1998 Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Oxford English Dictionary (OED) online
Powell, Mava Jo
1992 The systematic development of correlated interpersonal and metalinguistic uses in stance adverbs.
Cognitive Linguistics 3: 75–110.
Pullum, Geoffrey & Huddleston, Rodney
2002 Adjectives and adverbs. In
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language,
Rodney Huddleston &
Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 525–595. Cambridge: CUP.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000 English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2014 On the development of the point is and related issues in the history of American English.
English Linguistics 31(1): 79–113.
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2015 On the grammaticalization of the thing is and related issues in the history of American English. In
Studies in the History of the English Language, VI: Evidence and Method in Histories of English,
Michael Adams,
Laurel Brinton, and
Robert D. Fulk (eds), 99–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sinclair, John
1990 The Collins COBUILD English Grammar. London: Collins.
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Antony
1991a The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English.
Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 237–251.
[URL].
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995 Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In
Subjectivity and Subjectivisation,
Dieter Stein &
Susan Wright (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: CUP.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification. In
Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization,
Kristin Davidse,
Lieven Vandelanotte &
Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.
Tuggy, David
1996 The thing is is that people talk that way. The question is is Why? In
Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics,
Eugene H. Casad (ed.), 713–752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Corpus
Davies, Mark
2004 BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus (1980s–1993).
[URL]
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Keizer, Evelien, Thomas Schwaiger & Elnora ten Wolde
2022.
Modification in Functional Discourse Grammar: State of the art and issues addressed.
Open Linguistics 8:1
► pp. 512 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.