Chapter published in:
English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective: Current issues
Edited by Lotte Sommerer and Evelien Keizer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 221] 2022
► pp. 235276
References
Aijmer, Karin
2007The interface between discourse and grammar: The fact is that . In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 161], Agnes Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 31–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bache, Carl
2000Essentials of Mastering English: A Concise Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bellert, Irena
1977On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 337–50.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2011Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte & Davidse, Kristin
2010The grammaticalisation of nominal type noun constructions with kind/sort of: Chronology and paths of change. English Studies 91(2): 180–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brenier, Jason M. & Michaelis, Laura A.
2005Optimization via syntactic amalgam: Syntax-prosody mismatch and copula doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 45–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
2006Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
2009 Complete and sort of: From identifying to intensifying? Transactions of the Philological Society 107(3): 262–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1988Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudoclefts. Leuven: Leuven University Press/Fortis Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald P.
2012An analysis of The thing is that S sentences. Pragmatics 21(1): 41–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
2002The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Feist, Jim
2009Premodifier order in English nominal phrases: A semantic account. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2): 301–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Premodifiers in English: Their Structure and Significance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John & Forest, Richard W.
2015Signalling Nouns in English: A Corpus-Based Discourse Approach. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6: 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke
2014The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2014An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn, revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haumann, Dagmar
2007Adverb Licensing and Clause Structure in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 105]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1989Layers and operators in Functional Discourse Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 25(1): 127–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Adverbs in Functional Grammar. In Toward a Functional Lexicology, Gerd Wotjak (ed.), 126–136. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2017A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In The grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective, Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 13–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Francis R.
1979The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S.
1972Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
2007The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Categorization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The X is (is) construction: An FDG account. In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137], J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 213–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016The (the) fact is (that) construction in English and Dutch. In Outside the Clause: The Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 59–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019The problem of non-truth-conditional, lower-level modifiers: A Functional Discourse Grammar solution. English Language and Linguistics 24(2), 365–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, Carolien
1995Discourse Particles in Latin. Amsterdam: Gieben. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diana
1999 Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what’s the right analysis? English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 335–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina
1998Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (OED) online
Oxford: OUP.
Powell, Mava Jo
1992The systematic development of correlated interpersonal and metalinguistic uses in stance adverbs. Cognitive Linguistics 3: 75–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey & Huddleston, Rodney
2002Adjectives and adverbs. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 525–595. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2014On the development of the point is and related issues in the history of American English. English Linguistics 31(1): 79–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015On the grammaticalization of the thing is and related issues in the history of American English. In Studies in the History of the English Language, VI: Evidence and Method in Histories of English, Michael Adams, Laurel Brinton, and Robert D. Fulk (eds), 99–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1990The Collins COBUILD English Grammar. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
2002‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Antony
1991aThe discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 237–251. https://​dpi​.org​/10​.1016​/0378​-2166(91)90012​-M. Crossref
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony
1991bA quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, David
1996The thing is is that people talk that way. The question is is Why? In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, Eugene H. Casad (ed.), 713–752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Corpus

Davies, Mark
2004BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus (1980s–1993). https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/bnc/