Premodification in X-is constructions
Fact and point
Although most studies on the X-is construction (thing-is, fact-is, point-is, etc.) acknowledge that premodification is allowed, very little attention has been paid to this property of the construction. Focusing on instances with the head nouns fact and point, this paper seeks to find out which premodifiers can be found in these constructions, and how the development of the construction from a fully specificational copular sentence with a referential subject NP to a non-specificational semi-fixed focus marker affects the type and range of premodifiers allowed. On the basis of data from the British National Corpus (Davies 2004), a number of tendencies and restrictions are identified in terms of (i) token and type frequencies of the premodifiers, as well as type-token-ratio (TTR), and (ii) the class and function of the premodifiers. It is concluded that, as constructionalization takes place, the premodifier position becomes constrained. In addition, it is shown that non-specificational constructions clearly prefer subjective modifiers, which, due to an increase in scope, come to serve a different function (e.g. attitudinal, intensifying, or downtoning). It is argued that the changes observed follow from the gradual changes taking place in the internal structure of the constructions in question. Finally, the theory of Functional Discourse Grammar is used to capture these changes and to explain the consequences of these changes both for the fact-is and point-is constructions in general and for the classes of premodifiers allowed (or preferred).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Preliminaries
- 3.The fact-is and point-is constructions
- 3.1Function and form
- 3.2Specificational vs. non-specificational constructions
- 4.Premodification in the fact-is and point-is constructions
- 4.1Premodification patterns for fact and point
- 4.1.1Most frequent premodifiers
- 4.1.2Classes of premodifiers
- 4.2Correlation between premodifier and construction type
- 4.2.1Premodifier vs. construction type: Fact
- 4.2.2Premodifier vs. construction type: Point
- 4.3Summary
- 5.FDG analysis
- 5.1Introduction to FDG
- 5.1.1Overall characterization
- 5.1.2Levels of analysis
- 5.1.2.1The Interpersonal Level
- 5.1.2.2The Representational Level
- 5.1.2.3The Morphosyntactic Level
- 5.2Premodification in constructions with fact and point
- 5.2.1Fact/point as fully lexical nouns
- 5.2.2The fact-is and point-is constructions as focus-cum-contrast markers
- 5.2.3The fact-is and point-is constructions as focality markers
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Corpus
-
Appendix
References (52)
References
Bache, Carl. 2000. Essentials of Mastering English: A Concise Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bellert, Irena. 1977. On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 337–50.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Brems, Lieselotte. 2011. Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brems, Lieselotte & Davidse, Kristin. 2010. The grammaticalisation of nominal type noun constructions with kind/sort of: Chronology and paths of change. English Studies 91(2): 180–202.
Brenier, Jason M. & Michaelis, Laura A. 2005. Optimization via syntactic amalgam: Syntax-prosody mismatch and copula doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 45–88.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP.
Davidse, Kristin. 2009. Complete and sort of: From identifying to intensifying? Transactions of the Philological Society 107(3): 262–292.
Declerck, Renaat. 1988. Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudoclefts. Leuven: Leuven University Press/Fortis Publications.
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.
Feist, Jim. 2009. Premodifier order in English nominal phrases: A semantic account. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2): 301–340.
Feist, Jim. 2012. Premodifiers in English: Their Structure and Significance. Cambridge: CUP.
Flowerdew, John & Forest, Richard W. 2015. Signalling Nouns in English: A Corpus-Based Discourse Approach. Cambridge: CUP.
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2014. The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn, revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge.
Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators in Functional Discourse Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 25(1): 127–157.
Hengeveld, Kees. 1997. Adverbs in Functional Grammar. In Toward a Functional Lexicology, Gerd Wotjak (ed.), 126–136. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Hengeveld, Kees. 2017. A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In The grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective, Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 13–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Higgins, Francis R. 1979. The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. New York NY: Garland.
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Keizer, Evelien. 2007. The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Categorization. Cambridge: CUP.
Keizer, Evelien. 2013. The X is (is) construction: An FDG account. In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137], J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 213–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keizer, Evelien. 2016. The (the) fact is (that) construction in English and Dutch. In Outside the Clause: The Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 59–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keizer, Evelien. 2019. The problem of non-truth-conditional, lower-level modifiers: A Functional Discourse Grammar solution. English Language and Linguistics 24(2), 365–392.
Kroon, Carolien. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin. Amsterdam: Gieben.
Massam, Diana. 1999. Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what’s the right analysis? English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 335–352.
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina. 1998. Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Oxford English Dictionary (OED) online. Oxford: OUP.
Powell, Mava Jo. 1992. The systematic development of correlated interpersonal and metalinguistic uses in stance adverbs. Cognitive Linguistics 3: 75–110.
Pullum, Geoffrey & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Adjectives and adverbs. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 525–595. Cambridge: CUP.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2014. On the development of the point is and related issues in the history of American English. English Linguistics 31(1): 79–113.
Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2015. On the grammaticalization of the thing is and related issues in the history of American English. In Studies in the History of the English Language, VI: Evidence and Method in Histories of English, Michael Adams, Laurel Brinton, and Robert D. Fulk (eds), 99–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sinclair, John. 1990. The Collins COBUILD English Grammar. London: Collins.
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Antony. 1991a. The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 237–251. [URL].
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: CUP.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.
Tuggy, David. 1996. The thing is is that people talk that way. The question is is Why? In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, Eugene H. Casad (ed.), 713–752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Corpus
Davies, Mark. 2004. BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus (1980s–1993). <[URL]>
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Keizer, Evelien, Thomas Schwaiger & Elnora ten Wolde
2022.
Modification in Functional Discourse Grammar: State of the art and issues addressed.
Open Linguistics 8:1
► pp. 512 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.