Time-measurement constructions in English
A corpus-based exploration
Time-measurement expressions such as five-year plan, 10 years’ time and 25 years service occur frequently in English. All such expressions consist of a cardinal numeral, followed by a time-noun (N1) then a second noun (N2). The time-noun has one of three orthographic forms: the bare-form, the S-form with apostrophe or the S-form without apostrophe. Using a dataset of 17,591 time-measurement tokens from the British National Corpus and mixed-effects logistic regression modelling, this chapter tests the hypothesis that these three orthographic forms represent three different constructions. Our first model, using only expressions with S-form N1, shows that the presence or absence of an apostrophe is not correlated with any other formal or semantic property that would justify the recognition of two constructions. In contrast, our second model using the whole dataset, shows that bare-form N1 and S-form N1 (with or without apostrophe) are highly correlated with aspects of both form and meaning. In our dataset, 96% of tokens with bare-form N1 have a countable N2 and 87% also follow a determiner. Conversely, 94% of tokens with S-form N1 have an uncountable N2, and 91% also lack a determiner. We conclude that these clusters of properties represent distinct pairings of form and meaning, and are therefore characteristic of two different constructions, which we call the time-measurement compound construction and the time-measurement construction respectively. The time-measurement compound construction (five-year plan) has the distribution of a nominal; semantically, it denotes a kind of bounded entity (N2) with some relation to numeral-N1, usually duration. The time-measurement construction (10 years’ time, 25 years service) has the distribution of a noun phrase; semantically, it denotes a quantity (numeral-N1) of some unbounded entity (N2). The chapter ends with a qualitative exploration of the central and more peripheral representatives of the two constructions, including borderline cases.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Construction Grammar
- 2.2The S-genitive construction
- 2.3The measure noun pseudo-partitive construction
- 2.4The phrasal compound construction
- 2.5The measurement as modifier construction
- 2.6Interim summary
- 3.Creating a database
- 3.1Selecting examples
- 3.2Metatextual categories
- 3.3Orthography
- 3.4Morphosyntax
- 3.5Length
- 3.6Frequency
- 3.7Semantics
- 4.Model 1: Apostrophe use with S-form N1
- 4.1Methodology
- 4.2Results and discussion
- 5.Model 2: Use of the S-form
- 5.1Methodology
- 5.2Results and discussion
- 6.Characteristics of the two constructions
- 6.1Overview
- 6.2Central exemplars
- 6.3Variation in the time-measurement compound construction
- 6.4Variation in the time-measurement construction
- 6.5Time-measurement phrasal compounds and ambiguous types
- 7.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Akaike, Hirotugu
1974 A new look at the statistical model identification.
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19(6): 716–723.


Baayen, Harald R.
2008 Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: CUP.


Baayen, Harald R., Davidson, Douglas J. & Bates, Douglas M.
2008 Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items.
Journal of Memory and Language 59(4): 390–412.


Baayen, Harald R., Piepenbrock, Richard & Guilkers, Leon
1995 The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.

Baayen, Harald R. & Shafaei-Bajestan, Elnaz
2019 languageR: Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics.
R package version 1.5.0.
[URL].
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve
2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.
Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48.


Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP.


Bell, Melanie J.
2012 The English noun-noun construct: A morphological and syntactic object. In
Morphology and the Architecture of Grammar. On-line Proceedings of the Eighth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM8) Cagliari, 14–17 September 2011,
Angela Ralli,
Geert Booij,
Sergio Scalise &
Athanasios Karasimos (eds), 59–91.
[URL]> (
2 July 2021).
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Booij, Geert
2009 Compounding and construction morphology. In
The Oxford Handbook of Compounding,
Rochelle Lieber &
Pavol Stekauer (eds), 201–216. Oxford: OUP.

Bybee, Joan L.
2013 Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar,
Thomas Hoffmann &
Graeme Trousdale (eds), 49–69. Oxford: OUP.

Cambridge University Press
1999 Cambridge Dictionary Online [URL]> (
4 June 2021)
Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP.


Croft, William & Cruse, Alan D.
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.


Diessel, Holger
2019 The Grammar Network. Cambridge: CUP.


Falco, Michelangelo & Zamparelli, Roberto
2019 Partitives and partitivity.
Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 111.


Fillmore, Charles J., Lee-Goldman, Russell R. & Rhodes, Russell
2012 The framenet constructicon. In
Sign-based Construction Grammar,
Hans Christian Boas &
Ivan A. Sag (eds), 309–372. Stanford CA: CSLI.

Goldberg, Adele E.
2002 Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations.
Cognitive Linguistics 13(4): 327–356.


Goldberg, Adele
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.

Goldberg, Adele
2013 Constructionist approaches. In
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar,
Thomas Hoffmann &
Graeme Trousdale (eds), 15–31. Oxford: OUP.

Gries, Stefan T. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.


Hilpert, Martin
2019 Construction Grammar and its Application to English, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: EUP.

Hoffmann, Sebastian, Evert, Stefan, Smith, Nicholas, Lee, David & Berglund-Prytz, Ylva
2008 Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb – A Practical Guide. English Corpus Linguistics, Vol. 6. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Construction Grammar: Introduction. In
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar.
Thomas Hoffmann &
Graeme Trousdale (eds), 1–13. Oxford: OUP.

Jackendoff, Ray
1991 Parts and boundaries.
Cognition 41: 9–45.


Jackendoff, Ray
1996 The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14(2): 305–354.


Keizer, Evelien
2007 The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: OUP.


Langacker, Ronald
1995 Possession and possessive constructions. In
Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World.
John Taylor &
Robert MacLaury (eds), 51–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Langacker, Ronald W.
1999 Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter.


Lin, Jing, Hacohen, Aviya & Schaeffer, Jeannette
2018 The interpretation of the mass-count distinction across languages and populations: Introduction.
Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1): 70. 1–10.


Lyons, John
1977 Semantics, 2 Vols. Cambridge: CUP.

Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney
2002 Nouns and noun phrases. In
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language,
Rodney Huddleston &
Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 323–524. Cambridge: CUP.


Pelletier, Francis Jeffry
1975 Non-singular reference: Some preliminaries.
Philosophia 5(4): 451–465.


Plag, Ingo, Lohmann, Arne, Ben Hedia, Sonia & Zimmermann, Julia
2020 An s is an ’s, or is it? plural and genitive plural are not homophonous.
Complex Words: Advances in Morphology: 260–292.


Quirk, Randolf, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

R Core Team
2019 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
[URL]> (
2 July 2021).
Rosenbach, Anette
2006 Descriptive genitives in English: A case study on constructional gradience.
English Language and Linguistics 10(1): 77–118.


Stefanowitsch, Anatol
1998 Possession and partition: The two genitives of English. Hamburg: Seminar für Englische Sprache und Kultur.

Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2003 Constructional semantics as a limit to grammatical variation. In
Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English,
Gunter Rohdenburg &
Britta Mondorf (eds), 55–173. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Taylor, John
1989 Possessive genitives in English.
Linguistics 27: 663–686.


Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.


University of Oxford
2016 The University of Oxford Style Guide.
[URL]> (
27 May 2021)
Vos, Riet
1999 A Grammar of Partitive Constructions. PhD dissertation, Tilburg University.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.