Day to day and night after night
Temporal NPN constructions in Present Day English
This paper analyzes temporal symmetric NPN constructions in which both nouns are singular, identical, and conjoined by a preposition (e.g. day to day, hour upon hour, night after night). The constructions’ binominal structure, their idiomatic nature, their apparent frozenness, and their syntactic restrictions (e.g. determiners are not permitted) make them an interesting target for linguistic analysis. Although several researchers have analyzed these constructions in different frameworks (e.g. Travis 2001; Matsuyama 2004; Haïk 2009; Jackendoff 2008, 2013; Zwarts 2013; Kim & Sells 2015), there is no study which looks at these constructions quantitatively. Consequently, the paper analyzes data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English. The constructions’ frequency and productivity, as well as their syntactic function and extension potential is being investigated (e.g. day after day of suffering, hour by precious hour). Additionally, the constructions’ semantics and interesting clustering and multiplication patterns are discussed. In terms of theoretical modeling, the paper takes a Usage-based Cognitive Construction Grammar approach (Goldberg 2003, 2006, 2019; Tomasello 2003; Hilpert 2014; Diessel 2015, 2019; Ellis et al. 2016; Sommerer & Smirnova 2020) and sketches the constructional network of [CNsg,time
i P CNsg,time
i]Cx –constructions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Symmetric NPNs
- 2.1Characteristic features of NPN constructions
- 2.2Previous studies
- 3.Empirical analysis
- 3.1Methodology
- 3.2Results
- 3.2.1Overall frequency and productivity
- 3.2.2Modification and complementation
- 3.2.3Syntactic functions
- 3.2.4Multiplication and clustering
- 4.A constructional network approach to temporal NPN constructions
- 4.1Postulation of individual NPN constructions on different constructional levels
- 4.2Additional, more complex templates
- 4.2.1Template with optional modification/complementation slot?
- 4.2.2Stylistic templates (multiplication, clustering)
- 5.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
-
Statistics
-
Package nnet (multinomial regression)
References
Beck, Sigrid & von Stechow, Arnim
2006 Dog after dog revisited. In
Proceedings of the Sinn und Bedeutung 10,
Christian Ebert &
Cornelia Endriss (eds) 43–54.
[URL]> (
2 July 2021).
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice
2012 Entrenchment in Usage-based Theories. What Corpus Data Do and Do not Reveal About The Mind. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.


Cappelle, Bert
2006 Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”.
Constructions Online SV1–7: 1–28.

Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.


Croft, William & Cruse, Allen
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.


Culicover, Peter W.
1999 Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases in Syntax. Oxford: OUP.

Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
2005 Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP.


Diessel, Holger
2011 Review of “Language, usage and cognition” by Joan Bybee.
Language 87: 830–844.


Diessel, Holger
2015 Usage-based construction grammar. In
Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics,
Ewa Dąbrowska &
Dagmar Divjak (eds), 295–321. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Diessel, Holger
2019 The Grammar Network. How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.


Ellis, Nick C., Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Mathew B.
2016 Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar [
Language Learning Monograph Series 66]. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary C.
1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone.
Language 64: 501–538.


Goldberg, Adele E.
2003 Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5): 219–224.


Goldberg, Adele E.
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.

Goldberg, Adele E.
2019 Explain me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Haïk, Isabelle
2009 Symmetric structures.
Corela 11.
[URL]> (
2 July 2021).
Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto
2003 Coordinated bare definites.
Linguistic Inquiry 34: 443–469.


Hilpert, Martin
2014 Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: EUP.

Hilpert, Martin & Diessel, Holger
2016 Entrenchment in Construction Grammar. In
Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning,
Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), 57–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP.


Jackendoff, Ray
2002 Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP.


Jackendoff, Ray
2008 ‘Construction after Construction’ and its theoretical challenges.
Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 84(1): 8–28.


Jackendoff, Ray
2013 Constructions in the parallel architecture. In
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar,
Thomas Hoffmann &
Graeme Trousdale (eds), 70–92. Oxford: OUP.

Kim, Jong-Bok & Sells, Peter
2015 English binominal NPs: A construction-based perspective.
Journal of Linguistics 51(1): 41–73.


König, Ekkehard & Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2009 Spatial reciprocity: between grammar and lexis. In
Form and Function in Language Research: Papers in Honour of Christian Lehmann,
Johannes Helmbrecht,
Yoko Nishina,
Yong-Min Shin,
Stavros Skopeteas &
Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds), 57–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Matsuyama, Tetsuya
2004 The N after N construction: A constructional idiom.
English Linguistics: Journal of English Linguistics Society of Japan 21: 55–84.


Matsuyama, Tetsuya
2006 A Note of the two-sided behavior of N after N.
English Linguistics: Journal of English linguistics society of Japan 23: 446–453.


Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney
2002 Nouns and noun phrases. In
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language,
Rodney Huddleston &
Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 323–523. Cambridge: CUP.


Pi Chia-Yi, Tony
1995 The Structure of English Iteratives [
Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics], 434–445. Toronto: University of Toronto.

Pskit, Wiktor
2012 The English NPN forms: Words or constructions? In
Exploring Language Through Contrast,
Sławomir Wacewicz,
Tomasz Fojt &
Waldemar Skrzypczak (eds), 126–144. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

Pskit, Wiktor
2017 Linguistic and philosophical approach to NPN structures. In
Topics in Syntax and Semantics: Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives,
Wiktor Pskit (ed.), 93–128. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Svartvik Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Sommerer, Lotte & Smirnova, Elena
Sommerer, Lotte & Baumann, Andreas
2021 Of absent mothers, strong sisters and peculiar daughters: The constructional network of English NPN constructions.
Cognitive Linguistics 32(1), 97–131.


Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T.
Stefanowtisch, Anatol
2006 Negative evidence and the raw frequency fallacy.
Corpus Linguistics and Lingistic Theory 2(1): 61–77.


Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2013 Collostructional analysis. In
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar,
Graeme Trousdale &
Thomas Hoffmann (eds), 290–306. Oxford: OUP.

Tomasello, Michael
2003 Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Travis, Lisa
2001 The syntax of reduplication. In
Proceedings of NELS 31, 455–469.

Travis, Lisa
2003 Reduplication feeding syntactic movement. In
Proceedings of Canadian Linguistics Association,
Sophie Burelle &
Stanca Somesfalean (eds), 236–247. Montreal: University of Quebec.

Van de Velde, Freek
2014 Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In
Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar,
Ronny Boogaart,
Timothy Colleman &
Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.


Williams, Edwin
1994 Remarks on lexical knowledge. In
The Acquisition of the Lexicon,
Lila R. Gleitman &
Barbara Landau (eds), 7–34. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Zehentner, Eva
2019 Competition in Language Change: The Rise of the English Dative Alternation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.


Zwarts, Joost
2013 From N to N: The anatomy of a construction.
Linguistics and Philosophy 36(1): 65–90.


Statistics
R Core Team
2018 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
[URL]
Package nnet (multinomial regression)
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D.
2002 Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn..


Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.