References (49)
References
Beck, Sigrid & von Stechow, Arnim. 2006. Dog after dog revisited. In Proceedings of the Sinn und Bedeutung 10, Christian Ebert & Cornelia Endriss (eds) 43–54. <[URL]> (2 July 2021).
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice. 2012. Entrenchment in Usage-based Theories. What Corpus Data Do and Do not Reveal About The Mind. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2006. Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions Online SV1–7: 1–28.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Allen. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. 1999. Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases in Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2011. Review of “Language, usage and cognition” by Joan Bybee. Language 87: 830–844. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Usage-based construction grammar. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 295–321. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. The Grammar Network. How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Mathew B. 2016. Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar [Language Learning Monograph Series 66]. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary C. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita. 2019. Reflections on the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 11(2): 171–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5): 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2019. Explain me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haïk, Isabelle. 2009. Symmetric structures. Corela 11. <[URL]> (2 July 2021).
Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto. 2003. Coordinated bare definites. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 443–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Diessel, Holger. 2016. Entrenchment in Construction Grammar. In Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning, Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), 57–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. ‘Construction after Construction’ and its theoretical challenges. Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 84(1): 8–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Constructions in the parallel architecture. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 70–92. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Sells, Peter. 2015. English binominal NPs: A construction-based perspective. Journal of Linguistics 51(1): 41–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 2009. Spatial reciprocity: between grammar and lexis. In Form and Function in Language Research: Papers in Honour of Christian Lehmann, Johannes Helmbrecht, Yoko Nishina, Yong-Min Shin, Stavros Skopeteas & Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds), 57–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matsuyama, Tetsuya. 2004. The N after N construction: A constructional idiom. English Linguistics: Journal of English Linguistics Society of Japan 21: 55–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. A Note of the two-sided behavior of N after N. English Linguistics: Journal of English linguistics society of Japan 23: 446–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 323–523. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent. 2015. Argument Structure in Usage-based Construction Grammar: Experimental and Corpus-based Perspectives [Constructional Approaches to Language 17]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pi Chia-Yi, Tony. 1995. The Structure of English Iteratives [Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics], 434–445. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Pskit, Wiktor. 2012. The English NPN forms: Words or constructions? In Exploring Language Through Contrast, Sławomir Wacewicz, Tomasz Fojt & Waldemar Skrzypczak (eds), 126–144. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
. 2017. Linguistic and philosophical approach to NPN structures. In Topics in Syntax and Semantics: Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives, Wiktor Pskit (ed.), 93–128. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Svartvik Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte & Smirnova, Elena. 2020. Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte & Baumann, Andreas. 2021. Of absent mothers, strong sisters and peculiar daughters: The constructional network of English NPN constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 32(1), 97–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte. 2020. Why we avoid the ‘Multiple Inheritance’ issue in Usage-based Cognitive Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34, 320–331.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T. 2003. Collostructions: investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (2): 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowtisch, Anatol. 2006. Negative evidence and the raw frequency fallacy. Corpus Linguistics and Lingistic Theory 2(1): 61–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2013. Collostructional analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Thomas Hoffmann (eds), 290–306. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 2001. The syntax of reduplication. In Proceedings of NELS 31, 455–469.Google Scholar
. 2003. Reduplication feeding syntactic movement. In Proceedings of Canadian Linguistics Association, Sophie Burelle & Stanca Somesfalean (eds), 236–247. Montreal: University of Quebec.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1994. Remarks on lexical knowledge. In The Acquisition of the Lexicon, Lila R. Gleitman & Barbara Landau (eds), 7–34. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva. 2019. Competition in Language Change: The Rise of the English Dative Alternation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Joost. 2013. From N to N: The anatomy of a construction. Linguistics and Philosophy 36(1): 65–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Statistics
R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]>
Package nnet (multinomial regression)
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Diessel, Holger
2023. The Constructicon, DOI logo
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2023.  Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach. Yearbook of Phraseology 14:1  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Sommerer, Lotte
2020. Why we avoid the ‘Multiple Inheritance’ issue in Usage-based Cognitive Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 320 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.