Beck, Sigrid & von Stechow, Arnim
2006Dog after dog revisited. In Proceedings of the Sinn und Bedeutung 10, Christian Ebert & Cornelia Endriss (eds) 43–54. [URL]> (2 July 2021).
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice
2012Entrenchment in Usage-based Theories. What Corpus Data Do and Do not Reveal About The Mind. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2006Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions Online SV1–7: 1–28.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Allen
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W.
1999Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases in Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2011Review of “Language, usage and cognition” by Joan Bybee. Language 87: 830–844. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Usage-based construction grammar. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 295–321. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019The Grammar Network. How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Mathew B.
2016Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar [Language Learning Monograph Series 66]. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary C.
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita
2019Reflections on the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 11(2): 171–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2003Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5): 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2019Explain me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haïk, Isabelle
2009Symmetric structures. Corela 11. [URL]> (2 July 2021).
Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto
2003Coordinated bare definites. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 443–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2014Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Diessel, Holger
2016Entrenchment in Construction Grammar. In Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning, Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), 57–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme
2013The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008‘Construction after Construction’ and its theoretical challenges. Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 84(1): 8–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Constructions in the parallel architecture. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 70–92. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Sells, Peter
2015English binominal NPs: A construction-based perspective. Journal of Linguistics 51(1): 41–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2009Spatial reciprocity: between grammar and lexis. In Form and Function in Language Research: Papers in Honour of Christian Lehmann, Johannes Helmbrecht, Yoko Nishina, Yong-Min Shin, Stavros Skopeteas & Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds), 57–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matsuyama, Tetsuya
2004The N after N construction: A constructional idiom. English Linguistics: Journal of English Linguistics Society of Japan 21: 55–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006A Note of the two-sided behavior of N after N. English Linguistics: Journal of English linguistics society of Japan 23: 446–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney
2002Nouns and noun phrases. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 323–523. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent
2015Argument Structure in Usage-based Construction Grammar: Experimental and Corpus-based Perspectives [Constructional Approaches to Language 17]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pi Chia-Yi, Tony
1995The Structure of English Iteratives [Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics], 434–445. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Pskit, Wiktor
2012The English NPN forms: Words or constructions? In Exploring Language Through Contrast, Sławomir Wacewicz, Tomasz Fojt & Waldemar Skrzypczak (eds), 126–144. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2017Linguistic and philosophical approach to NPN structures. In Topics in Syntax and Semantics: Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives, Wiktor Pskit (ed.), 93–128. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Svartvik Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte & Smirnova, Elena
2020Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte & Baumann, Andreas
2021Of absent mothers, strong sisters and peculiar daughters: The constructional network of English NPN constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 32(1), 97–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T.
2003Collostructions: investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (2): 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowtisch, Anatol
2006Negative evidence and the raw frequency fallacy. Corpus Linguistics and Lingistic Theory 2(1): 61–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2013Collostructional analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Thomas Hoffmann (eds), 290–306. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa
2001The syntax of reduplication. In Proceedings of NELS 31, 455–469.Google Scholar
2003Reduplication feeding syntactic movement. In Proceedings of Canadian Linguistics Association, Sophie Burelle & Stanca Somesfalean (eds), 236–247. Montreal: University of Quebec.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2014Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1994Remarks on lexical knowledge. In The Acquisition of the Lexicon, Lila R. Gleitman & Barbara Landau (eds), 7–34. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva
2019Competition in Language Change: The Rise of the English Dative Alternation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2013From N to N: The anatomy of a construction. Linguistics and Philosophy 36(1): 65–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar


R Core Team
2018R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]

Package nnet (multinomial regression)

Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D.
2002Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sommerer, Lotte
2020. Why we avoid the ‘Multiple Inheritance’ issue in Usage-based Cognitive Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 320 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.