Beck, Sigrid & von Stechow, Arnim
2006Dog after dog revisited. In Proceedings of the Sinn und Bedeutung 10, Christian Ebert & Cornelia Endriss (eds) 43–54. [URL]> (2 July 2021).
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice
2012Entrenchment in Usage-based Theories. What Corpus Data Do and Do not Reveal About The Mind. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2006Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions Online SV1–7: 1–28.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Allen
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W.
1999Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases in Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2011Review of “Language, usage and cognition” by Joan Bybee. Language 87: 830–844. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Usage-based construction grammar. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 295–321. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019The Grammar Network. How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Mathew B.
2016Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar [Language Learning Monograph Series 66]. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary C.
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita
2019Reflections on the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 11(2): 171–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2003Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5): 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2019Explain me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haïk, Isabelle
2009Symmetric structures. Corela 11. [URL]> (2 July 2021).
Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto
2003Coordinated bare definites. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 443–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2014Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Diessel, Holger
2016Entrenchment in Construction Grammar. In Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning, Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), 57–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme
2013The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008‘Construction after Construction’ and its theoretical challenges. Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 84(1): 8–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Constructions in the parallel architecture. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 70–92. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Sells, Peter
2015English binominal NPs: A construction-based perspective. Journal of Linguistics 51(1): 41–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2009Spatial reciprocity: between grammar and lexis. In Form and Function in Language Research: Papers in Honour of Christian Lehmann, Johannes Helmbrecht, Yoko Nishina, Yong-Min Shin, Stavros Skopeteas & Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds), 57–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matsuyama, Tetsuya
2004The N after N construction: A constructional idiom. English Linguistics: Journal of English Linguistics Society of Japan 21: 55–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006A Note of the two-sided behavior of N after N. English Linguistics: Journal of English linguistics society of Japan 23: 446–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney
2002Nouns and noun phrases. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 323–523. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent
2015Argument Structure in Usage-based Construction Grammar: Experimental and Corpus-based Perspectives [Constructional Approaches to Language 17]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pi Chia-Yi, Tony
1995The Structure of English Iteratives [Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics], 434–445. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Pskit, Wiktor
2012The English NPN forms: Words or constructions? In Exploring Language Through Contrast, Sławomir Wacewicz, Tomasz Fojt & Waldemar Skrzypczak (eds), 126–144. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2017Linguistic and philosophical approach to NPN structures. In Topics in Syntax and Semantics: Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives, Wiktor Pskit (ed.), 93–128. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Svartvik Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte & Smirnova, Elena
2020Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte & Baumann, Andreas
2021Of absent mothers, strong sisters and peculiar daughters: The constructional network of English NPN constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 32(1), 97–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T.
2003Collostructions: investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (2): 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowtisch, Anatol
2006Negative evidence and the raw frequency fallacy. Corpus Linguistics and Lingistic Theory 2(1): 61–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2013Collostructional analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Thomas Hoffmann (eds), 290–306. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa
2001The syntax of reduplication. In Proceedings of NELS 31, 455–469.Google Scholar
2003Reduplication feeding syntactic movement. In Proceedings of Canadian Linguistics Association, Sophie Burelle & Stanca Somesfalean (eds), 236–247. Montreal: University of Quebec.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2014Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1994Remarks on lexical knowledge. In The Acquisition of the Lexicon, Lila R. Gleitman & Barbara Landau (eds), 7–34. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva
2019Competition in Language Change: The Rise of the English Dative Alternation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2013From N to N: The anatomy of a construction. Linguistics and Philosophy 36(1): 65–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar


R Core Team
2018R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]

Package nnet (multinomial regression)

Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D.
2002Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Diessel, Holger
2023. The Constructicon, DOI logo
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2023.  Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach. Yearbook of Phraseology 14:1  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Sommerer, Lotte
2020. Why we avoid the ‘Multiple Inheritance’ issue in Usage-based Cognitive Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 320 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.