Chapter published in:
English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective: Current issues
Edited by Lotte Sommerer and Evelien Keizer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 221] 2022
► pp. 124
References
Aarts, Bas
1998[1997]English binominal noun phrases. Transactions of the Philological Society 96(1): 117–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Syntactic Gradience. The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Abney, Stephen P.
1987The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos
1996The Puzzle of Apposition: On so-called Appositive Structures in English. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
2009Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase. English Language and Linguistics 13(3): 453–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia
2000A lovely little example. Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia & González-Díaz, Victorina
2009History and structure of the English noun phrase: Introduction. Transactions of the Philological Society 107(3): 255–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The interface between discourse and grammar: The fact is that . In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 161], Agnes Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 31–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian & Lehrer, Adrienne
1976NP-like quantifiers and the problem of determining the head of an NP. Linguistic Analysis 2(4): 395–413.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita
2007Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allerton, David J.
1995Problems of modern English grammar IV. English Studies 76(1): 81–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M.
1997A Notional Theory of Syntactic Categories. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Doug & Sadler, Louisa
2014The big mess construction. In Proceedings of the LFG14 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 47–67. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Arnold, Doug & Spencer, Andrew
2015A constructional analysis for the skeptical. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Stefan Müller (ed.), 41–60. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
2003Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2008Dvandva. Word Structure 1(1): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Sigrid & von Stechow, Arnim
2006Dog after dog revisited. Proceedings of the Sinn und Bedeutung 10: 43–54.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans, Corver, Norbert & den Dikken, Marcel
1998Predication in nominal phrases. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 85–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berlage, Eva
2014Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Clark, Victoria
2002Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures. In English Historical Syntax and Morphology: Selected papers from 11 ICEHL [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223], Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María J. López-Couso (eds), 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2011Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language & Linguistics 15(2): 223–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Grammatical Complexity in Academic English. Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1967Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977Pronouns and Repeated Nouns. Bloomington IN: The Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1987The remarkable double IS. English today 9: 39–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine
2008The grammaticalization and subjectification of English adjectives expressing difference into plurality/distributivity markers and quantifiers. Folia Linguistica 42(2): 259–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Beyond mere syntactic change: Exploring micro-processes of change. In Late Modern English in Context, Marianne Hundt (ed.), 113–132. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine & Davidse, Kristin
2016The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20(2): 221–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2010Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics 14(1): 83–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The establishment for quantifier constructions for size nouns: a diachronic study of heap(s) and lot(s) . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13: 202–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte & Davidse, Kristin
2010The grammaticalisation of nominal type noun constructions with kind/sort of: Chronology and paths of change. English Studies 91: 180–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brenier, Jason & Michaelis, Laura
2005Optimization via syntactic amalgam: Syntax prosody mismatch and copula doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 45–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1975Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 13: 391–419.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
2006Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide to Spoken and Written English Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2010The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Citko, Barbara
2000Parallel Merge and the Syntax of Free Relatives. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
2005On the nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge and Parallel Merge. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4): 475–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coene, Martine & D’hulst, Yves
(eds) 2003aFrom NP to DP, Vol.1: The Syntax and Semantics of Noun Phrases [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 55]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(eds) 2003bFrom NP to DP, Vol. 2: The Expression of Possessives in Noun Phrases [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 556]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Breban, Tine & Van linden, An
2008Deictification: The development of secondary deictic meanings by adjectives in the English NP. English Language and Linguistics 12(3): 475–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
(ed.) 2016The Structure of the English NP. Synchronic and diachronic explorations. Special issue of Functions of language 23(1).Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Breban, Tine
2019A cognitive-functional approach to the order of adjectives in the English noun phrase. Linguistics 57(2): 327–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald P.
2012An analysis of The thing is that S sentences. Pragmatics 22(1): 41–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
2002History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki, 7 September 2002.
2005The grammaticalisations of sort of, kind of and type of in English. Paper presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 3, University of Santiago de Compostela, 17–20 July.
2011The construction of SKT. Paper presented at the Second Vigo-Newcastle-Santiago-Leuven International Workshop on the Structure of the Noun Phrase in English (NP2), Newcastle upon Tyne, 15–16 September.
De Smet, Hendrik
2008Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 12: 55–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smedt, Liesbeth, Lieselotte Brems & Davidse, Kristin
2007NP-internal functions and extended uses of the ‘type’ nouns kind, sort, and type: Towards a comprehensive, corpus-based description. In Corpus Linguistics 25 Years On, Roberta Facchinetti (ed.), 225–255. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
1998Predicate inversion in the DP. In Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase Phrases [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 22] Artemis Alexiadou & Chris Wilder (eds), 215–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion and Copulas. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2004Noun phrases without nouns. Functions of Language 11(1): 43–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feist, Jim
2012Premodifiers in English: Their Structure and Significance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ferris, Conner
1993The Meaning of Syntax: A Study in the Adjectives of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert
1998Predicate movement in pseudopartitives constructions In Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase Phrases [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 22] Artemis Alexiadou & Chris Wilder (eds), 215–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, John & Forest, Richard W.
2015Signalling Nouns in Academic English. A Corpus-Based Discourse Approach. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fonteyn, Lauren
2019Categoriality in Language Change: The Case of the English Gerund. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad
2004Expressive binominal NPs in Germanic and Romance languages. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 75–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Rijkhoff, Jan
(eds) 2008The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke
2009From determining to emphasizing meanings: The adjectives of specificity. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 43(2): 311–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke
2014The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase: Pathways of Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Davidse, Kristin
2011The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: Sources, paths and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 251–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glass, Lelia
2014Deriving the two readings of English Determiner + Adjective. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18, Urtzi Etxeberria, Anamaria Fǎlǎuş, Aritz Irurtzun & Bryan Leferman (eds), 164–181. https://​semanticsarchive​.net​/sub2013​/ProceedingsSuB18​.pdf> (30 June 2021).
2019Adjectives relate individuals to states: Evidence from the two readings of English Determiner + Adjective. Glossa 4(1): 24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González-Álvarez, Dolores, Martínez-Insua, Ana Elina, Perez Guerra, Javier & Rama-Martínez, Esperanza
(eds) 2011The structure of the noun phrase in English: Synchronic and diachronic explorations. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 201–415.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander
2014Transparent free relatives: Two challenges for the grafting approach. In Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, Agreement and Case, Anna Bondaruk, Grete Dalmi & Alexander Grosu (eds), 295–317. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016The semantics, syntax, and morphology of Transparent Free Relatives revisited: A comparison of two approaches. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34: 1245–1280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline
1980On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 636–678.Google Scholar
Günther, Christine
2015The Elliptical Noun Phrase in English: Structure and Use. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2018The rich, the poor, the obvious: Arguing for an ellipsis analysis of ‘adjectives used as nouns’. In Leung & van der Wurff (eds), 77–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haïk, Isabelle
2013Symmetric structures. Corela 11(1). https://​journals​.openedition​.org​/corela​/2875> (2 March 2019).
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2014An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar
1953On resolving the close apposition. American Speech 28: 165–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1994A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet, Maekelberghe, Charlotte & Buyle, Anouk
2019Nominal and verbal gerunds in Present-day English: Aspectual features and nominal status. Language Sciences 73: 32–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1955Attribution and apposition in English. American Speech 30: 99–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hollmann, Willem B.
2020Word classes. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie & Gergana Popova (eds), 281–300. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
(eds) 2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tanya & Matushansky, Ora
2006The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 23: 315–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1977X’ syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008’Construction after construction’ and its theoretical challenges. Language: Journal of the Linguistics Society of America 84(1): 8–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul & Sag, Ivan A.
2009Not as hard a problem to solve as you might have thought. In The proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stefan Müller (ed.), 44–48. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Keenan, Caitlin
2013A pleasant three days in Philadelphia: Arguments for a pseudopartitive analysis. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (Proceedings of the 36th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium) 19(1): 87–96.Google Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
2004Postnominal PP complements and modifiers: A cognitive distinction. English Language and Linguistics 8(2): 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The English Noun Phrase: the Nature of Linguistic Categorization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The X is (is) construction: An FDG account. In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137], Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 213–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016aThe (the) fact is (that) construction in English and Dutch. In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bWe teachers, you fools: Pro + N(P) constructions in Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 53: 177–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Noun phrases. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie & Gergana Popova (eds), 335–357. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kester, Ellen-Petra
1996Adjectival inflection and the licensing of empty categories in DP. Journal of Linguistics 32: 57–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Sells, Peter
2011The big mess construction: Interactions between the lexicon and constructions. English Language and Linguistics 15: 335–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015English binominal NPs: A construction-based perspective. Journal of linguistics 51(1): 41–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2004Remarks on nominal grounding. Functions of Language 11(1): 77–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard K. & Marušič, Franc
2004On indefinite pronoun structures with APs: Reply to Kishimoto. Linguistic Inquiry 35(2): 268–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leung, Alex Ho-Cheong & van der Wurff, Wim
(eds) 2018The Noun Phrase in English. Past and Present [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 246]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löbel, Elisabeth
1989Q as a functional category. In Syntactic Phrase Structure Phenomena in Noun Phrases and Sentences [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 6], Claudia Schmidt, Elisabeth Löbel & Christa Bhatt (eds), 133–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Arne
2014English Coordinate Constructions. A Processing Perspective on Constituent Order. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaele
2005English General Nouns. A Corpus Theoretical Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 20]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Margerie, Hélène
2010On the rise of (inter)subjective meaning in the grammaticalization of kind of/kinda. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 315–346. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Insua, Ana Elina & Pérez-Guerra, Javier
2011An open-sesame approach to English noun phrases: Defining the NP (with an introduction to the special issue). English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 201–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marušič, Frank & Žaucer, Rok
2013On the nature of prenumeral adjectives. SinFonIJA 6: 39–61.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane
1999The thing is construction: The thing is, is, what’s the right analysis. English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 335–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Extra be: The syntax of shared shell-noun constructions in English. Language 93(1): 121–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
2014The Positions of Adjectives in English. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick
1988To be or double be? Current changes in the English copula. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 287–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina
1998Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos
2003Empty nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 381–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney
2002Nouns and noun phrases. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 323–523. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John, Pullum, Geoffrey, Scholz, Barbara C. & Berlage, Eva
2013Anaphoric one and its implications. Language 88(4): 794–829. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John & Berlage, Eva
(eds) 2014The Genitive Variation in English. Special Issue of English Language and Linguistics 18(2).Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1972A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1988Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C.
2006Free relatives. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 1, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 338–382. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette
2014English genitive variation – The state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18(2): 215–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
1977Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Formal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 285–316. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael & Haley, Michael C.
2002The reduplicative copula is is . American Speech 77(3): 305–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2014On the development of the point is and related issues in the history of American English. English Linguistics Society of Japan 31(1): 79–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015On the grammaticalization of the thing is and related issues in the history of American English. In Studies in the History of the English Language: Evidence and Method in Histories of English, Michael Adams, Laurel Brinton & R. D. Fulk (eds), 99–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte
2018Article Emergence in Old English. A Constructionalist Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte & Baumann, Andreas
2021Of absent mothers, strong sisters and peculiar daughters: The constructional network of English NPN constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 32(1): 97–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sopher, H.
1971Apposition. English Studies 52: 401–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Elisabeth, Leiss, Elisabeth & Abraham, Werner
(eds) 2007Nominal Determination. Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1996The windowing of attention. In Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 235–288. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ten Wolde, Elnora
2019Linear vs hierarchical: Two accounts of premodification in the of-binominal noun phrase. Linguistics 57(2): 283–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ten Wolde, Elnora & Keizer, Evelien
2016Structure and substance in Functional Discourse Grammar: The case of the binominal noun phrase. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48(1): 134–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa
2003Reduplication feeding syntactic movement. In Proceedings of the 2003 Canadian Linguistic Association Annual Conference, Sophie Burelle Stanca Somesfalean (ed.), 236–247. Montréal: Département de linguistique et de didactique des langues, Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
Tuggy, David
1996The Thing is, is that people talk that way. The question is, is why? In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, Eugene H. Casad (ed.), 239–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2009aDe Nominale Constituent: Structuur en Geschiedenis. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar
2009bThe emergence of modification patterns in the Dutch noun phrase. Linguistics 47(4): 1021–1049. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The emergence of the determiner in the Dutch NP. Linguistics 48: 263–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Eynde, Frank
2007The big mess construction. In Proceedings of the HPSG07 Conference, Stefan Müller (ed.), 415–433. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2013From N to N: The anatomy of a construction. Linguistics and Philosophy 36(1): 65–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar