Chapter published in:
Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology
Edited by Matthias Eitelmann and Dagmar Haumann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 223] 2022
► pp. 118
References
Anderson, Stephen R.
1992A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1976Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: The MIT-Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald & Lieber, Rochelle
1991Productivity and English word-formation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29(5): 801–843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander
2018Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist (Picasso): Linguistic aberrancy from a constructional perspective. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 277–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Kompa, Nikola Anna
2020Creativity within and outside the linguistic system. Cognitive Semiotics 13(1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bochnak, M. Ryan & Csipak, Eva
2014A new metalinguistic degree morpheme. Proceedings of SALT 24: 432–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2013Taking Form: Structuring Sense Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The generative word. In The Cambridge companion to Chomsky, James McGilvray (ed), 110–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Botha, Rudolf P.
1984Morphological Mechanisms: Lexicalist Analysis of Synthetic Compounding. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2010Doubler-upper nouns: A challenge for usage-based models of language? In Cognitive Perspective on Word Formation, Alexander Onysko & Sascha Michel (eds), 335–374. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Playing by/with the rules: Creativity in language, games, and art. Cognitive Semiotics 13(1): 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Wit, Astrid, Petré, Peter & Brisard, Frank
2020Standing out with the progressive. Journal of Linguistics 56: 479–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anne-Marie & Williams, Edwin
1987On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: The MIT-Press.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A model for relevant types of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization, Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 103–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
2014Making New Words. Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eitelmann, Matthias, Haugland, Kari E. & Haumann, Dagmar
2015The -ish-factor: A corpus-based analysis of -ish-derivatives in English. Paper held at ICAME 36, 27–31 May 2015. Trier.Google Scholar
2020From engl-isc to whatever-ish: A corpus-based investigation of -ish derivation in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 24(4): 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gabelentz, Georg von der
1901 [1891]Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel.Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne & Yu, Alan C. L.
2006Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. The Linguistics Review 23(3): 213–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geurts, Bart
2000Explaining grammaticalization (the standard way). Linguistics 38(4): 781–788. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2019The Grammar of Expressivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge, MA: The MIT-Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf
1999State-of-the-article: Distributed Morphology. GLOT International 4(4): 3–9.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization, Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard & Rosenbach, Annette
2008Priming and unidirectional language change. Theoretical Linguistics 34(2): 85–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H.
2016Introduction. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Creativity, Rodney H. Jones (ed), 1–21. Oxfordshire & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1994Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kempf, Luise & Eitelmann, Matthias
2018Von diutisk zu dynamisch, von englisc zu anything-ish. -is(c)h kontrastiv diachron. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung/Journal of Word Formation 2018(1): 93–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmack, Stefanie
2007Ish: A New Case of Antigrammaticalization? Paper presented at the meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA), Anaheim, January 4–7.Google Scholar
Lapointe, Steven G.
1980A Theory of Grammatical Agreement. PhD dissertation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015 [1982]Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press (Classics in Linguistics, 1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1977Why Ap-ish but Worm-y? In Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics. Festschrift for Winfred P. Lehmann, Paul J. Hopper (ed), 341–364. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201–225.Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans
1969The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. Munich: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa
2013Extra-grammatical Morphology in English: Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Lori
1998A toughish problem: the meaning of -ish . LACUS Forum 24: 207–215.Google Scholar
Munat, Judith
2016Lexical creativity. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Creativity, Rodney H. Jones (ed), 92–106. Oxfordshire & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nilssen, Signe & Kinn, Torodd
2017A chameleon abroad: English -ish and ish used in Norwegian. Maal og Minne 1: 123–143.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel
2016Propositional ish as a syntactic Speech Act Phrase. In On the Move: Glancing Backwards to Build a Future in English Studies, Aitor Ibarrola-Armendariz & Jon Ortiz de Urbina Arruabarrena (eds), 307–313. Bilbao: University of Deusto.Google Scholar
2017Towards a morphosyntactic analysis of -ish . Word Structure 10(1): 54–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter
2017The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [be Ving]. English Language and Linguistics 21(2): 227–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo
2003Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
2016Two ideas of creativity. In Evidence, Experiment, and Argument in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language, Martin Hinton (ed), 15–26. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio
1984Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Günther, Franziska
2016Towards a unified socio-cognitive framework for salience in language. Frontiers in Psychology 7.1110, 1–4. Crossref.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1982The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT-Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Robert J. & Lubarg, Todd I.
1999The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In Handbook of Creativity, Robert J. Sternberg (ed), 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uhrig, Peter
2020Creative intentions – The fine line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’. Cognitive Semiotics 13(1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
2006Grammaticalization. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 5. 2nd edition, Brown, Keith (ed), 129–135. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
1987Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Aske, Jon, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds), 330–340. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar