Cover not available
Part of
Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology
Edited by Matthias Eitelmann and Dagmar Haumann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 223] 2022
► pp. 51–72

Extravagance, productivity and the development of -ingly adverbs

The paper claims that the process of deriving -ly adverbs from present participles has become increasingly productive over the last 500 years. It is argued that many ‘-ingly adverbs’ are extravagant, in the sense of Haspelmath (1999). This claim is supported by the fact that such adverbs are very common in prose fiction, which is a genre that admits of extravagant language. It is hypothesised that the category of -ingly adverbs has evolved around a few frequent types but that extravagant -ingly uses have caused the category to expand by pushing at the boundaries of what is considered acceptable. The change is explained within an exemplar-based model of morphological change and against the backdrop of ‘adverbialisation’.

Keywords: morphological productivity, adverbialisation, -ly adverbs, exemplars
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Aims and organization
  • 2.Theoretical preliminaries: Extravagance, creativity and productivity
    • 2.1Extravagance and creativity
    • 2.2Productivity
  • 3.The development of -ingly adverbs: relevant research
  • 4.Data sources and methodology
  • 5.The quantitative development of -ingly adverbs
    • 5.1The overall productivity of -ingly derivation: data from the four fiction corpora
    • 5.2The development of the various adverbial categories: An overview
    • 5.3Some innovative users – and uses – of -ingly adverbs and the question of extravagance
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Research question 1: The productivity of -ingly derivation in the last 500 years
    • 6.2Research question 2: Factors triggering the development of -ingly adverbs and the role of extravagance
    • 6.3Adverbialisation, analogues, and the role of frequent users
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Data sources
  • References
Published online: 16 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.223.03kil
References

Data sources

[BNC] Davies, Mark (2004-) BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at [URL]
[ECF] Eighteenth-Century Fiction 1996 Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar
[EEPF] Early English Prose Fiction 1997 Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar
[NCF] Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 1999–2000. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.
Baayen, R. Harald
1994 Derivational productivity and text typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1: 16–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald & Renouf, Antoinette
1996 Chronicling the Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72(1): 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2001 Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1989 A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P. & Blevins, Juliette
2009 Introduction: Analogy in grammar. In Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds), 1–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972 Degree Words. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano
2012 Oriented -ingly adjuncts in Late Modern English. In English Historical Linguistics 2008: Selected Papers from the Fifteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 15), Munich, 24–30 August 2008. Volume II: Words, Texts and Genres, Hans Sauer & Gaby Waxenberger (eds), 147–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Beckner, Clay
2015 Usage-based theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 953–980. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowie, Claire
2000 The Discourse Motivations for Neologising: Action Nominalization in the History of English. In Lexicology, Semantics and Lexicography in English Historical Linguistic: Papers from the Fourth G.L. Brook Symposium, Manchester, August 1998, Julie Coleman & Christian J. Kay (eds), 179–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowie, Claire & Dalton-Puffer, Christiane
2002 Diachronic word-formation: changes in productivity. In A changing world of words: studies in English historical lexicography, lexicology and semantics, Javier E. Díaz Vera (ed), 410–436. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Donovan, Melissa
2019 Writing tips: Abolish the adverbs. Writing Forward, 30 July 2019, [URL]Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne & Yu, Alan C. L.
2006 Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. The Linguistics Review 23(3): 213–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice & Campbell, Lyle
1995 Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Killie, Kristin
1998 The spread of -ly to present participles. In Advances in English Historical Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 119–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Stative Adverbs in English: A Study of Adverbial Productivity and Orientation. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
2007 On the development and use of appearance/attribute adverbs in English. Diachronica 24(2): 327–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Secondary grammaticalization and the English adverbial -ly suffix. Language Sciences 47(B): 199–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
1984 Why great: greatly but not big: *bigly? Studia Linguistica 38: 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995 Synsemantika. In Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuchzeitgenössischer Forschung, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 1251–1266. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menn, Lise & Macwhinney, Brian
1984 The repeated morph constraint: toward an explanation. Language 60(3): 519–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1994 Aspects of adverbial change in Early modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed), 243–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, William
2008 Don’t Use Adverbs and Adjectives to Prettify Your Prose. Writer’s Digest: Write Better, Get Published, 21 August 2008, [URL].Google Scholar
[OED] Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edn 1989 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo
1999 Morphological productivity: structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pratt, Lynda & Denison, David
2000 The language of the Southey-Coleridge Circle. Language Sciences 22(3): 401–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reed, Shannon
2014 The case against adverbs. Teachers at work: a column about teaching, 18 July 2014, [URL]Google Scholar
Schultink, Henk
1961 Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen. Forum der Letteren 2: 110–125.Google Scholar
Skinner, John
2001 An Introduction to Eighteenth-Century Fiction: Raising the Novel. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swan, Toril
1990 Subject-oriented adverbs in 20th century English. Nordlyd 16: 14–58.Google Scholar
1997 From manner to subject modification: adverbialization in English. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 20(2): 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Adverbialization and subject-modification in Old English. In Advances in English historical linguistics, Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 443–456. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Marle, Jaap
1985 On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Schillová, Aksana
2023. Adverbs Derived from Adjectival Present Participles in Polish, Slovak and Czech: A Comparative Corpus-Based Study. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 74:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.