Diggers-out, leaf clearer-uppers and stayer-onner-for-nowers
On creativity and extravagance in English -er nominalisations
To this day, the English -er suffix prototypically derives agent nouns from verbs (rideV → rider – ‘someone who Vs’). Over the course of a millennium, the -er suffix construction has consistently extended its range of application, and from the 20th century onwards, it has further gained in variablity in that it allows for multiple attachment of -er, such as in looker-onner or stayer-onner-for-nower. The repetition of -er is accompanied by an increase in expressiveness. Additionally, internet attestations suggest there are several other English suffixes that can be repeated in the same manner as -er, consider -y in runny-outy red felt pen and -ed in kicked-upped. The systematicity of this morphosyntactic phenomenon suggests that some speakers of English occasionally choose to flout some rules to create structurally unusual, expressive, and extravagant complex words.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Creativity and extravagance in morphology
- 2.1Creativity
- 2.1.1Intent
- 2.1.2Prescriptive criticism
- 2.2Expressiveness
- 2.3Extravagance
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.Derivatives involving -er suffix repetition
- 4.1-er doubling in nominalisations of particle verbs and prepositional verbs
- 4.2Retriplication of -er
- 4.3-er doubling in nominalisations of verbs and prepositional phrases
- 4.4Excessive or abundant -er suffixation
- 5.Suffix repetition beyond -er
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
2004 Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word-Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, Mark
1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, Mark & Furhop, Nana
2002 Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraint.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3): 251–490.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie
1983 English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergs, Alexander
2018 Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist (Picasso): Linguistic aberrancy from a constructional perspective.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 277–293.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, Geert
2010 Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cappelle, Bert
2010 Doubler-upper nouns. A challenge for usage-based models of language? In
Cognitive Perspectives on Word-Formation,
Alexander Onysko &
Sascha Michel (eds), 335–374. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chapman, Don
2008 Fixer-uppers and passers-by: Nominalization of verb-particle constructions. In
Studies in the History of Language IV: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Studies of Language Change,
Susan M. Fitzmaurice &
Sascha Michel (eds), 265–299. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, David
2006 Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David
2008 Patterns and productivity. In
Studies in the History of the English Language VI: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Study of English Language Change,
Susan M. Fitzmaurice &
Donka Minkova (eds), 207–230. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, Richard M. W.
2014 Making New Words. Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farrel, Patrick
2005 English verb-preposition constructions: constituency and order.
Language 81(1): 96–137.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fortin, Antonio
2012 The Morphology and Semantics of Expressive Affixes. Oxford: University of Oxford.
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele
2016 Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In
Approaches to Complex Predicates,
Léa Nash &
Pollet Samvelian (eds), 110–141. Leiden: Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E.
2019 Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Good, Jeff
2016 The Linguistic Typology of Templates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(7): 1043–1068.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, Martin
2013 Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffmann, Thomas
2018 Creativity and Construction Grammar: Cognitive and psychological issues.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 259–276.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffmann, Thomas
2020 Construction Grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology, and cognitive science.
Cognitive Semiotics. 1–11.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian
Jackendoff, Ray
1973 The base rules for prepositional phrases. In
A Festschrift for Morris Halle,
Stephen Anderson &
Paul Kiparsky (eds), 345–356. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto
1942 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munsgard.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Jong-Bok & Michaelis, Laura A.
(
2020)
Syntactic Constructions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klégr, Aleš & Čermak, Jan
2010 Neologisms of the ‘on-the-pattern-of’ type: analogy as a word-formation process? In
The Prague Structure and Theories of Structure,
Martin Procháska,
Markéta Malá &
Pavlína Šaldová (eds), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey
1969 A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London, Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lensch, Anke
2018 Fixer-uppers: Reduplication in the derivation of phrasal verbs. In
Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse,
Rita Finkbeiner &
Ulrike Freywald (eds), 158–181. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Los, Bettelou, Blom, Corrien, Booij, Geert, Elenbaas, Marian & van Kemenade, Ans
2012 Morphosyntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matinello, Elisa
2013 Extra-Grammatical Morphology in English. Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McIntyre, Andrew
2004 Sum: English Affix Reduplication.
The Linguist List 15.1929.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Gary D.
2014 Lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oxford English Dictionary
2021 online edition.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda
2001 A conceptional analysis of English -er nominals. In
Applied Coginitive Linguistics in Language Pedagogy,
Martin Pütz,
Susanne Niemeier &
René Driven (eds), 149–200. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Potts, Christopher
2013 Conventional implicature and expressive content. In
Semantics. An international Handbook of natural language meaning,
Claudia Maienborn,
Klaus von Heusinger &
Paul Portner (eds), Volume 3, 598-621 .Berlin; Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohdenburg, Günter
2003 Cognitive complexity and ‘horror aequi’ as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In
Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English,
Günter Rohdenburg &
Britta Mondorf (eds), 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ryder, Mary Ellen
1999 Bankers and Blue-chippers. Of -er nominalizations in Present-day English.
English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 269–297.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sampson, Geoffrey
2016 Two ideas of creativity. In
Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language,
Martin Hinton (ed), 15–26. Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elizabeth
1984 Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT-Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
The Times
2017 The Times Style Guide. Glasgow: Harper Collins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thim, Stefan
2012 Phrasal Verbs: The English Verb-Particle Construction and Its History. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uhrig, Peter
2020 Creative intentions – The fine line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’.
Cognitive Semiotics. 1–19.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walker, James
2009 Double -er suffixation in English. Morphological, phonological and sociolinguistic reflections.
Lexis – Journal in English Lexicology HS 1: 5–13.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wentworth, Harold
1936 On adding the suffix of agency, -ER, to adverbs.
American Speech 11: 245–274.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin
1981 On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”.
Linguistic Inquiry 12(2): 369–370.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zeschel, Arne
2012 Incipient Productivity: A Construction-Based Approach to Linguistic Creativity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Belén López Meirama
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2023.
Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach.
Yearbook of Phraseology 14:1
► pp. 89 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.