Chapter published in:
Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology
Edited by Matthias Eitelmann and Dagmar Haumann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 223] 2022
► pp. 73100
References
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
2004Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word-Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1976Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Furhop, Nana
2002Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3): 251–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander
2018Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist (Picasso): Linguistic aberrancy from a constructional perspective. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 277–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2010 Doubler-upper nouns. A challenge for usage-based models of language? In Cognitive Perspectives on Word-Formation, Alexander Onysko & Sascha Michel (eds), 335–374. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Don
2008 Fixer-uppers and passers-by: Nominalization of verb-particle constructions. In Studies in the History of Language IV: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Studies of Language Change, Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Sascha Michel (eds), 265–299. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2006Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
2008Patterns and productivity. In Studies in the History of the English Language VI: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Study of English Language Change, Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Donka Minkova (eds), 207–230. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Richard M. W.
2014Making New Words. Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrel, Patrick
2005English verb-preposition constructions: constituency and order. Language 81(1): 96–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, Antonio
2012The Morphology and Semantics of Expressive Affixes. Oxford: University of Oxford. https://​ora​.ox​.ac​.uk​/objects​/uuid:88a23d7c​-c229​-49af​-9fc9​-2cb35fce9d54.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2016Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In Approaches to Complex Predicates, Léa Nash & Pollet Samvelian (eds), 110–141. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2019Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Good, Jeff
2016The Linguistic Typology of Templates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(7): 1043–1068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
2018Creativity and Construction Grammar: Cognitive and psychological issues. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 259–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Construction Grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology, and cognitive science. Cognitive Semiotics. 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian
1999’Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres. The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1973The base rules for prepositional phrases. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 345–356. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1942A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munsgard.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Michaelis, Laura A.
(2020) Syntactic Constructions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klégr, Aleš & Čermak, Jan
2010Neologisms of the ‘on-the-pattern-of’ type: analogy as a word-formation process? In The Prague Structure and Theories of Structure, Martin Procháska, Markéta Malá & Pavlína Šaldová (eds), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1969A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Lensch, Anke
2018 Fixer-uppers: Reduplication in the derivation of phrasal verbs. In Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse, Rita Finkbeiner & Ulrike Freywald (eds), 158–181. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou, Blom, Corrien, Booij, Geert, Elenbaas, Marian & van Kemenade, Ans
2012Morphosyntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matinello, Elisa
2013Extra-Grammatical Morphology in English. Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2004Sum: English Affix Reduplication. The Linguist List 15.1929.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary D.
2014Lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
2021 online edition.Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda
2001A conceptional analysis of English -er nominals. In Applied Coginitive Linguistics in Language Pedagogy, Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier & René Driven (eds), 149–200. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2013Conventional implicature and expressive content. In Semantics. An international Handbook of natural language meaning, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), Volume 3, 598-621 .Berlin; Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
2003Cognitive complexity and ‘horror aequi’ as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, Mary Ellen
1999 Bankers and Blue-chippers. Of -er nominalizations in Present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 269–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Complex -er nominals: Where grammaticalization and lexicalization meet? In Between Grammar and Lexicon, Ellen Contini-Morava & Yishai Tobin (eds), 291–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
2016Two ideas of creativity. In Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language, Martin Hinton (ed), 15–26. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth
1984Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT-Press.Google Scholar
The Times 2017The Times Style Guide. Glasgow: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Thim, Stefan
2012Phrasal Verbs: The English Verb-Particle Construction and Its History. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uhrig, Peter
2020Creative intentions – The fine line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’. Cognitive Semiotics. 1–19.Google Scholar
Walker, James
2009Double -er suffixation in English. Morphological, phonological and sociolinguistic reflections. Lexis – Journal in English Lexicology HS 1: 5–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wentworth, Harold
1936On adding the suffix of agency, -ER, to adverbs. American Speech 11: 245–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1981On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2): 369–370.Google Scholar
Zeschel, Arne
2012Incipient Productivity: A Construction-Based Approach to Linguistic Creativity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar