Chapter published in:
Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology
Edited by Matthias Eitelmann and Dagmar Haumann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 223] 2022
► pp. 131154
References
Bauke, Leah S.
2014Symmetry Breaking in Syntax and the Lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Review of Hagit Borer: Taking form: Structuring sense volume III. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Linguistische Berichte 243: 116–130.Google Scholar
2016Parametric variation in nominal root compounding. In Rethinking Parameters, Luis Eguren, Olga Fernandez-Soriano & Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds), 203–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Syntactic variation in compounds and idioms: some insights from a root-based analysis. Linguistische Berichte 259: 349–390.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005aIn Name Only: Structuring Sense. Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005bThe Normal Course of Events: Structuring Sense. Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Taking Form: Structuring Sense. Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The generative word. In The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, James McGilvray (ed), 110–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham, MA.: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by Phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gallego, Angel
2010Phase Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes
2007Spelling out dynamic interfaces. Linguistic Analysis 33(3–4): 197–208.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1997The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katamba, Francis
1993Morphology. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Kovecses, Zoltan & Szabó, Peter
1996Idioms: a view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics 17: 326–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lohndal, Terje
2020Syntactic categorization of roots. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Mark Aronoff (ed), Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukai, Makiko
2013Recursive compounds and linking morpheme. International Journal of English linguistics 3(4): 36–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narita, Hiroki
2009Full interpretation of optimal labeling. Biolinguistics 3(2–3): 213–254.Google Scholar
2011Phasing-in full interpretation. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan & Wasow, Thomas
1994Idioms. Language 70(3): 491–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans
1994Inflection and derivation. In The Encyclopedia on Language and Linguistics. Volume III, Ron E. Asher (ed), 1671–1678. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas W., Snyder, William & Hiramatsu, Kazuko
2002Learnability in a minimalist framework: root compounds, merger and the syntax-morphology interface. In The process of Language Acquisition, Ingeborg Lasser (ed), 25–35. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas W. & Snyder, William
2005Language learnability and the forms of recursion. In UG and External Systems, Anna-Maria DiSciullo (ed), 155–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio
1986Inflection and derivation. Linguistics 22: 561–581.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1982The Syntax of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
1991Morphological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina
2007Root merger in Chinese compounds. Studia Linguistica 61(2): 170–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar