Cover not available
Part of
Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology
Edited by Matthias Eitelmann and Dagmar Haumann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 223] 2022
► pp. 207–232

They’re proing it up hardcore

An analysis of the V it up construction

| University of Mainz,
The V it up construction expresses an exuberant or excessive performance of the activity denoted by the verb. The present study uses data from Twitter and the Urban Dictionary to analyse current uses of V it up. It employs the frameworks of extravagance (Haspelmath 1999/Keller 1994), expressiveness (Zwicky & Pullum 1987) and gradual transitivity (Hopper & Thompson 1980) to assess the range of heads that partake in the construction and the way it marks these as verbs. Results show that the construction is productively used with verbs converted from various word-classes and even with phrases in the open slot. The construction’s ability to take these extravagant heads goes hand in hand with its penchant for imperatives and progressives, which emphasise the action and are thus excellent verbalisers.
Keywords: transitivity, social media, conversion, verbal constructions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Properties of the V it up construction
    • 2.1Linguistic description of V it up and its components
    • 2.2Speakers’ intuitions about V it up
  • 3.Extravagance, expressiveness and transitivity
    • 3.1Extravagance
    • 3.2Expressiveness
    • 3.3Transitivity and prototypicality
  • 4.Data and method
  • 5.Analysis: V it up on Twitter
    • 5.1Promiscuity with regard to input category & input basehood
    • 5.2Transitivity and prototypicality
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.223.09sch
References (39)
References
Aitchison, Jean. 2003. Metaphors, models and language change. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed), 39–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allerton, David. 1982. Valency and the English Verb. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2005. Particle Patterns in English. A Comprehensive Coverage. Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1983. The Grammatical Role of the Causee in Universal Grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics 49(2): 115–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depallday. 2011. World Series of Poker down to three. 8 November 2011, <[URL]> (20 April 2020).Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 2011. The definition of modality. In Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect, and Epistemic Modality, Patard, Adeline & Brisard, Frank (eds), 21-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat, Reed, Susan & Cappelle, Bert. 2006. The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase. Volume 1: The Grammar of the English Tense System: A Comprehensive Analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Tom & Marquez, Lorenzo. 2013. WERQ: Bruce Willis in Dolce&Gabbana at the “Red 2” Premiere. Tom & Lorenzo. 12 July 2013. <[URL]> (20 April, 2020).Google Scholar
Fraser, James B. 1961. An Examination of the Verb-Particle Construction in English. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Gardelle, Laure. 2011. Whoop her up, hit it, go it alone: The role of the personal pronoun in the fossilization process. Yearbook of Phraseology 2: 163–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2010. Corpus, Cognition and Causative Constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Syntax. Volume II. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2016. Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In Approaches to Complex Predicates, Léa Nash & Pollet Samvelian (eds), 110–141. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Mondorf, Britta. 2016. ‘Snake legs it to freedom’: Dummy it as pseudo-object. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(1): 73–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, Britta & Schneider, Ulrike. 2016. Detransitivization as a support strategy for causative bring. English Language and Linguistics 20(3): 439–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
New Oxford American Dictionary, s.v. “yuck2”, 2011, <[URL]> (20 April 2020).Google Scholar
OED Online, s.v. “extravagant, adj. and n.”, March 2020 <[URL]> (20 April 2020).
OED Online, s.v. “ham, v.2.”, March 2020. <[URL]> (20 April 2020).Google Scholar
OED Online, s.v. “jazz, v.”, March 2020. <[URL]> (20 April 2020).Google Scholar
OED Online, s.v. “keep, v.”, March 2020. <[URL]> (20 April 2020).Google Scholar
OED Online, s.v. “live, v.”, March 2020. <[URL]> (20 April 2020).Google Scholar
Peckham, Aaron. 2005. Urban Dictionary. Fularious Street Slang Defined. Kansas, MO: Andrews McMeel.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1988. Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4): 635–670.Google Scholar
Quayle, Nigel. 1994. UP et le verbe à particule en anglais contemporain. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. Zur Einführung und Behauptung lexikalischer Einheiten durch syntaktische Struktursignale im Englischen. In Lexical Structures and Language Use. Proceedings of the International Conference on Lexicology and Lexical Semantics Münster, September 13–15, 1994, Edda Weigand & Franz Hundsnurscher (eds), 105–117. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rose, Ashley. 2017. Sugar and cloth. Instagram, 16 December 2017, <[URL]> (20 April 2020).Google Scholar
Scherl, Magdalena. 2018. TwitterCorpusQuery 2.0. Mainz.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas. 1780. A General Dictionary of the English Language. London: Dodsley, Dilly and Wilkie.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Urban Dictionary, s.v. “-ing it up”, 4 August 2004, <[URL]> (20 April 2020)
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1987. Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1987, John Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds), 330–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Belén López Meirama
2024.  Vete a freír cristales . Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.