Chapter published in:
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 95116
References
Abrusán, Márta
2011Presuppositional and negative islands. A semantic account. In: Natural Language Semantics 19: 257–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Presupposition cancellation. Explaining the ‘soft-hard’ trigger distinction. In: Natural Language Semantics 24: 165–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, Dorothy
2014The semantics of additive either . In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19: 20–36.Google Scholar
2015 A New Account for too and either. Handout from the Annual Penn Linguistics Conference 39 (March 20–22).
Aloni, Maria
2001Quantification under Conceptual Covers. University of Amsterdam dissertation.
Beaver, David and Henk Zeevat
2007Accommodation. In: The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.): 502–538. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beaver, David and Brady Clark
2008Sense and Sensitivity. How Focus Determines Meaning. Malden, MA/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brasoveanu, Adrian and Anna Szabolcsi
2013Presuppositional TOO, postsuppositional TOO. In: The dynamic, inquisitive and visionary life of φ, ?φ and ◇φ . A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof and Frank Veltman. Maria Aloni, Michael Franke and Floris Roelofsen (eds.): 55–64. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara
2008An Argument against Assimilating Appositive Relatives to Coordinate Structures. In: Linguistic Inquiry 39(4): 633–655. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida Khadiga
1991Resumptive Chains in Restrictive Relatives, Appositives and Dislocation Structures. MIT dissertation.
Féry, Caroline
2009Postponed ‘auch’. Where does its accent come from? In: Snippets 20: 23–27Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai
2004Would you believe it? The king of France is back! Presuppositions and truth-value intuitions. In: Descriptions and Beyond. Marga Reimer and Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.): 269–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart and Rob van der Sandt
2004Interpreting focus. In: Theoretical Linguistics 30: 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, James and Mark de Vries
2014Parenthesis and presupposition in discourse. In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2014 Anita Auer and Björn Köhnlein (eds.): 39–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, James
2015On appositives. University of Groningen, PhD thesis.
Grubic, Mira and Marta Wierzba
2019Presupposition Accommodation of the German Additive Particle ‘auch’ (=‘too’). In: frontiers in Communication 4(15): 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene
1992Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs. In: Journal of Semantics 9: 183–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kobuchi-Philip, Mana
2009Japanese Mo. Universal, Additive, and NPI. In: Journal of Cognitive Science 10: 172–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1999Additive Particles under Stress. In: Proceedings of SALT 8. Devon Strolovitch and Aaron Lawson (eds.): 111–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul
1990/2009Presupposition and Anaphora. Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem. In: Linguistic Inquiry 40(3): 367–386.Google Scholar
Levinson, Dmitry
2008Licensing of negative polarity particles ‘yet’, ‘anymore’, ‘either’ and ‘neither’. Combining downward monotonicity and assertivity. University of Stanford dissertation.
McCawley, James D.
1998The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolae, Andreea
2020Negative polarity additive particles. In: Monotoncity in Logic and Language. Dun Deng, Fenrong Liu, Mingming Liu and Dag Westerstahl (eds.): 166–182. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Dennis and Edgar Onea
2015On the form and meaning of appositives. In: Proceedings of NELS 45. Thuy Bui and Deniz Özyildiz (eds.): 203–212. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Ott, Dennis
2016Ellipsis in appositives. In: Glossa 1(1): 34: 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Reis, Marga and Inger Rosengren
1997A Modular Approach to the Grammar of Additive Particles. The Case of German ‘Auch’. In: Journal of Semantics 14: 237–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992A Theory of Focus Interpretation. In: Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rullmann, Hotze
2003Additive Particles and Polarity. In: Journal of Semantics 20: 329–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruys, Eddy G.
2015On the Anaphoricity of Too. In: Linguistic Inquiry 46(2): 343–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Sandt, Rob and Bart Geurts
2001Too. In: Proceedings of the 13th Amsterdam Colloquium: 180–185.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Bernhard
2005Scalar Additive Particles in Negative Contexts. In: Natural Language Semantics 13: 125–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1984Phonology and Syntax. The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2015What do quantifier particles do? In: Linguistics and Philosophy 38: 159–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Additive Presuppositions Are Derived Through Activating Focus Alternatives. In: Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium. Alexandre Cremers, Thom van Gessel and Floris Roelofsen (eds.): 455–464.Google Scholar
2018Two types of quantifier particles. Quantifier-phrase internal vs. heads on the clausal spine. In: Glossa 3(1): 69: 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Mark
2006The Syntax of Appositive Relativization. On Specifying Coordination, False Free Relatives and Promotion. In: Linguistic Inquiry 37(2): 229–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeevat, Henk
2004Particles. Presupposition Triggers, Context Markers or Speech Act Markers. In: Optimality Theory and Pragmatics: 91–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar