Chapter published in:
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 117146
References
Abraham, Werner & Elisabeth Leiss
2012Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram
1979Ausdrucksweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deutschen und im Englischen. Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln und Vergewisserungsfragen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2011German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cartoni, Bruno & Thomas Meyer
2012Extracting directional and comparable corpora from a multilingual corpus for translation studies. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Istanbul.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Monika
1985Epistemische Bedeutung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Sophia
2016Modal particles, discourse structure and Common Ground management. Theoretical and empirical aspects. Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Farkas, Donka & Kim B. Bruce
2010On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27(1): 81–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita & Kerstin Fischer
2007Introduction. In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 1–12. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1984Remarks on contrastive pragmatics. In Contrastive Linguistics: Prospects and Problems, Jacek Fisiak (ed), 119–141. de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2007Grounding and Common Ground: Modal particles and their translation equivalents. In Lexical markers of Common Grounds, Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 47–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Maiken Heide
2018Inferential processes in English and the question whether English has modal particles. Open Linguistics 4(1): 509–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1879Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: Verlag von Louis Nebert.Google Scholar
Frith, Uta & Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
2006Social cognition. In Cognitive Systems. Information Processing Meets Brain Science, Richard Morris, Lionel Tarassenko & Michael Kenward (eds), 138–188. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker
2008Modal particles and context updating – the functions of german ja, doch, wohl and etwa . In Modalverben und Gram-matikalisierung, Heinz Vater, Ole Letnes & Eva Maagerø (eds), 153–177. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
2022Comparing annotation types and n-gram sizes: A case study of the German modal particles ja and doch and their English reflexes in the Europarl-corpus, based on n-gram distributions. In Data and Methods in Corpus Linguistics: Comparative Approaches, Ole Schutzler & Julia Schlüter (eds), 323–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Patrick Georg
2020Discourse particles. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics. Part F. Meaning, Use, and Cognition, Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann & Thomas Zimmermann (eds). John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine
2008A question of commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 101–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2015Use-Conditional Meaning. Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Charles Leonard
1971Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37: 130–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene
1983File change semantics and the familiarity theory of def-initeness. In Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 164–190. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, Elke
1986Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln. Ja, doch, halt und eben, RGL , volume 63. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Aidan, Eva Blomqvist, Michael Cochez, Claudia d’Amato, Gerard de Melo, Claudio Gutierrez, José Emilio Labra Gayo, Sabrina Kirrane, Sebastian Neumaier, Axel Polleres, Roberto Navigli, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Sabbir M. Rashid, Anisa Rula, Lukas Schmelzeisen, Juan Sequeda, Steffen Staab & Antoine Zimmermann
2021Knowledge graphs. arXiv:2003.02320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1988Of course: A pragmatic particle in New Zealand women’s and men’s speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 49–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle
1993From Discourse to Logic: An Introduction to Model-Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1976Discourse referents. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 7, James McCawley (ed), 363–386. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Koehn, Philipp
2005Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. Phuket. MT Summit X.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Volker Gast
2018Understanding English-German Contrasts. Berlin: Erich-Schmidt Verlag, 4th edition.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard, Detlef Stark & Susanne Requardt
1990Adverbien und Partikeln. Ein deutsch-englisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2015Bias in commitment space semantics: Declarative questions, negated quetions, and question tags. Proceedings of SALT (Semantics and Linguistic Theory) 25: 328–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Diana
2007From temporal to contrastive and causal: The emergence of connective after all . In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks, Agnes Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 89–99. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Grammaticalizing connectives in English and discourse information structure. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change, Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José Vicente Lozano (eds), 135–157. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson
1987Rhetorical Structure Theory. A theory of text organization. Technical report, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California., Marina del Rey, CA.Google Scholar
Müller, Sonja
2018Distribution und Interpretation von Modalpartikel-Kombinationen. Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders
1880On the algebra of logic. American Journal of Mathematics 3: 15–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1885On the algebra of logic. American Journal of Mathematics 7: 180–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peixoto, Tiago P.
2014The graph-tool python library. figshare CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2002The syntax and semantics of As-parentheticals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 623–689. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1996Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In OSU Working Papers in Linguistics (Papers in semantics), 91–136.Google Scholar
2012Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5(6): 1–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sowa, John F.
1987Semantic networks. In Encyclopaedia of Artificial Intelligence, volume 2, Stuart C. Shapiro (ed), 1011–1024. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
2002Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5): 701–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westra, Evan & Peter Carruthers
2018Theory of mind. In Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science, Todd K. Shackelford & Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford (eds), 1–7. Cham: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weydt, Harald
1969Abbtönungspartikel. Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen & Karin Aijmer
2010How prosody reflects semantic change: A synchronic case study of ‘of course’. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens (eds), 103–154. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zipes, Jack
2015Grimm Legacies. The Magic Spell of the Grimms’ Folk and Fairy Tales. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar