Part of
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 177208
Abraham, Werner
1991The Grammaticalization of the German Modal Particle. In Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological studies in language 19.2], Bernd Heine & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adelaar, Willem. F. H.
1977Tarma Quechua: Grammar, texts, dictionary. Lisse: De Ridder.Google Scholar
2013A Quechuan mirative? In Perception and cognition in language and culture. Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds), 95–109. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Aikenvald, Alexandra Y.
2012The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16(3): 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1986Contrastive linking in spoken and written English. In English in Speech and Writing [Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 60], Gunnel Tottie & Ingegerd Bäcklund. (eds), 13–40. Stockholm: Almquist & Wolsell.Google Scholar
Bade, Nadine
2016Obligatory presupposition triggers in discourse-empirical foundations of the theories maximize presupposition and obligatory implicatures. Doctoral dissertation, Univ. Tübingen.
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur & Nora Boneh
2016Discourse update at the service of mirativity effects: the case of the Discursive Dative. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26: 103–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2002On the development of final ‘though’: a case of grammaticalization? In New reflections on grammaticalization [Typological studies in language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 345–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Hans-Georg Obenauer
2011Discourse Particles, Clause Structure, and Question Types. The Linguistic Review 28(4): 449–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David I. & Brady Z. Clark
2010Sense and Sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Christensen, Rune H. B.
2019Ordinal: Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 2019.12-10. Cran R-project 15 December 2019 [URL]> (27 June 2020)
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
1998On the concessive relation in conversational English. In Anglistentag 1998 Erfurt. Proceedings. Fritz-Wilhelm Neumann & Sabine Schülting (eds), 29–39. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997Mirativity: the grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1(1): 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dvořák, Bostjan & Remus Gergel
2004Slovenian clitics: VP ellipsis in yes/no questions and beyond. In ESSLLI 16: Proceedings of the workshop on the syntax, semantics and pragmatics of questions, ed. I. Comorovski and M. Krifka, 85–91.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Maiken Heide
2018Inferential processes in English and the question whether English has modal particles. Open Linguistics 4(1): 509–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker
2019An exploratory, corpus-based study of concessive markers in English, German and Spanish: The distribution of ‘although’, ‘obwohl’ and ‘aunque’ in the Europarl corpus. In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 305]. Óscar Loureda, Inés Recio Fernández, Laura Nadal & Adriana Cruz (eds), 151–191 Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gergel, Remus
2007Interpretable features in vP-ellipsis: on the licensing head. Proceedings of Console XIV: 165–188.Google Scholar
2008Comparative inversion: a diachronic study. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11: 191–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020Sich ausgehen: actuality entailments and further notes from the perspective of an Austrian German motion verb construction. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, Martín Fuchs & Joshua Phillips (eds). New Orleans: LSA Publications 5: 5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gergel, Remus, Martin Kopf-Giammanco & Maike Puhl
2021Simulating semantic change: a methodological note. In Proceedings of Experiments in Linguistic Meaning (ELM) 1, Andrea Beltrama, Florian Schwarz & Anna Papafragou (eds.). 184–196. University of Pennsylvania: LSA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post
2015Final Particles. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2012Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of Common Ground in spoken discourse: final particles in English. Language & Communication 32(3): 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Magnus, Nissel Magnus & Karin Puga
2016Old Bailey Corpus 2.0.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1988Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Cross-linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In Explaining Language Universals. John A. Hawkins (ed), 145–166. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
2000Causal and concessive clauses: Formal and semantic relations. In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Bernd Kortmann & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 341–360. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 243–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, Monica & Johan Rooryck
2017Aspect, evidentiality, and mirativity. Lingua Special Issue Essays on Evidentiality. Monica Lau & Willem Adelaar (eds), Lingua 186–187: 110–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2010Argument & Rhetoric. Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2004Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(6): 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mexas, Haris
2016Mirativity as realization marking: A cross-linguistic study. MA dissertation, Leiden University
Potts, Christopher
2012Conventional implicature and expressive content. In Semantics HSK 33.3. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus v. Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter. 2516–2535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randoph, Sidney Greenbaum, , GeoffreyLeech & Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reich, Ingo
2011Ellipsis. In Semantics HSK 33.2. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus v. Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter. 1849–1874.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Elisabeth
1996Contrast: adversative and concessive relations and their expressions in English, German, Spanish, Portuguese on sentence and text level [Research in Text Theory 23]. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Survey of English Usage
1998International Corpus of English – GB. London: University College London.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans
2022A small word in a large picture: discourse particle thenover the history of English. In Particles in German, English, and Beyond, Gergel, Remus, Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds), 147–175. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Susanne
2005Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2011Discourse Particles. In Semantics HSK 33.2. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus v. Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter. 2012–2038.Google Scholar