Chapter in:
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 243268
References
Aijmer, Karin
1977Partiklarna ju och väl. Nysvenska studier 57, 205–216.Google Scholar
1996Swedish modal particles in a contrastive perspective. Language Sciences 18, 393–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The Swedish modal particle väl in a contrastive perspective. Nordic Journal of English Studies 14, 174–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andvik, Erik A.
1992A Pragmatic Analysis of Norwegian Modal Particles. Dallas, Texas: SIL.Google Scholar
Beltrama, Andrea
2015From Totally Dark to Totally Old. The Formal Semantics of Subjectification. In Eva Csipak and Hedde Zeijlstra (eds.): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 125–142.Google Scholar
2016#Unfortunately, you are bello tall. From beauty to intensification. Poster presented at the 90th LSA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. URL: https://​andreabeltrama​.files​.wordpress​.com​/2019​/10​/bello​-naples​.pdf
Berg, Ivar
2016A note on the relationship between Scandinavian and Low German. Journal of Historical Linguistics 2, 189–210.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel, and Katharina Hartmann
2001The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 229–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin
1994Abtönungspartikeln im Deutschen: Bedeutung und Genese. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 22, 129–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Henry, and Lisa Matthewson
2016Against all expectations: The meaning of St’át’imcets séna7 . In Papers for the International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages 51, UBC Working Papers in Linguistics 42 , 37–67.Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini
2014Formal semantics/pragmatics and language change. In: Claire Bowern, and Bethwyn Evans (eds.): The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Routledge, 393–409.Google Scholar
2015Diachronic Semantics. The Annual Review of Linguistics 1, 179–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeReKo = The German Reference Corpus DeReKo, at the Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit
2009Diachronic pathways and pragmatic strategies: Different types of pragmatic particles from a diachronic point of view. In: Björn Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard, and Jacqueline Visconti (eds.): Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics. Bingley: Emerald, 43–61.Google Scholar
DeVeaugh-Geiss, Joseph
2014 Wohl and the semantics of assumptions. MSc thesis, University of Potsdam.
Diewald, Gabriele
2011Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49, 365–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DWB = Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob und Wilhelm Grimm
. 16 Bde. in 32 Teilbänden. Leipzig 1854–1961 Quellenverzeichnis Leipzig 1971. Online-Version accessed on 23 August 2016, http://​woerterbuchnetz​.de​/DWB/.
Eckardt, Regine
2011Semantic Reanalysis and Language Change. Language and Linguistics Compass 5, 33–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine, and Andrea Beltrama
2019Evidentials and Questions. In Christopher Pinon (ed.): Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 12, Paris: CSSP, 121–155.Google Scholar
Egg, Markus
2012Discourse particles at the semantics-pragmatics interface. In Werner Abrahm and Elisabeth Leiss (eds.): Modality and Theory of Mind elements across languages. Berlin: de Gruyter, 297–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, Kai, and Lisa Matthewson
2008Universals in Semantics. The Linguistic Review 25, 139–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fretheim, Thorstein
1991Formal and functional differences between S-internal and S-external modal particles in Norwegian. Multilingua 10, 175–200.Google Scholar
2018 Vel i spørresetninger: en pragmatisk analyse. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, 36, 5–39.Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit, and Elena Castroviejo
2016Good Manners: On the Degree Effect of Good Events. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20 , 252–269.Google Scholar
Göbel, Alexander
2018Evidentiality and Undirected Questions: A New Account of the German Discourse Particle wohl. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 24.1, 77–86. https://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/pwpl​/vol24​/iss1​/10
Grosz, Patrick Georg
2017Shedding new light on the wohl muddle: The particle schier in Austrian German. Wiener Linguistische Gazette (WLG) 82 [Themenheft 11-11-17. Festschrift für Martin Prinzhorn , ed. by Clemens Mayr and Edwin Williams], 71–78.Google Scholar
2021Discourse particles. In Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann, and Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.): The Companion to Semantics (SemCom). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar
1982Scandinavian language structures: a comparative historical survey. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hügel, Franz Seraph
1873Der Wiener Dialekt: Lexikon der Wiener Volkssprache. Wien: A. Hartleben. https://​books​.google​.com​/books​?id​=TxUJAAAAQAAJ
Lassiter, Daniel
2016 Must, knowledge, and (in)directness. Natural Language Semantics 24, 117–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindner, Katrin
1991‘Wir sind ja doch alte Bekannte.’ The use of German ja and doch as modal particles. In Werner Abraham (ed.): Discourse Particles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 163–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa, and Henry Davis
2018Micro-variation in discourse particles: From St’át’imcets to German. Presentation at MIT Colloquium, 2nd November 2018.
NAOB = Det Norske Akademis Ordbok (Norwegian Academy Dictionary)
OMC = The Oslo Multilingual Corpus
(1999–2008), the Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo, http://​www​.hf​.uio​.no​/ilos​/english​/services​/omc/.
Penka, Doris
2006Almost there: The meaning of almost . In Christian Ebert and Cornelia Endriss (eds.): Proceedings of the Sinn und Bedeutung 10, 275–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, Eric
2006Interactions With Context. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65, 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard, and Ulrich Detges
2007Different functions, different histories: Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6, 61–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2008Discourse particles in the left periphery. In: B. Shaer et al. (eds.). Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives. London: Routledge, 200–231.Google Scholar
2011Discourse particles. In Paul Portner, Claudia Maienborn, and Klaus von Heusinger (eds.): Handbook of Semantics./Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2012–2038. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Wird schon stimmen! A degree operator analysis of schon . Journal of Semantics 35, 687–739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar