Cover not available
Part of
Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications
Edited by Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina and Cristina Lara-Clares
[Studies in Language Companion Series 225] 2022
► pp. 3–18

Chapter 1
Dangerous liaisons

An introduction to derivational paradigms

| University of Turin
Article outline
  • 1.Paradigms we live by
  • 2.Associative relations and derivational paradigms: A plea for the unity of morphology
  • 3.Paradigms for word formation
  • 4.The paradigmatic dimension and the return of lexicality
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.225.01gae
References
Anderson, Stephen R.
1992 A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2002 What you can do with derivational morphology. In Morphology 2000: Selected Papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, 24–28 February 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 218], Sabrina Bendjaballah, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Maria D. Voeikova (eds), 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Thomas
1990 Analogie und morphologische Theorie. München: Fink.Google Scholar
1993 Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P.
2016 Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana
2019 Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29: 167–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
1993 Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert & Hüning, Matthias
2014 Affixoids and constructional idioms. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 77–106. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2020 Paradigms lost – paradigms regained. Paradigms as hyper-constructions. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 27], Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds), 277–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, Livio
1998 Some remarks on analogy, reanalysis and grammaticalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 89–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Exploring grammaticalization from below. In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 45–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 Analogical change. In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 147–160. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013 Affix ordering and conversion: Looking for the place of zero. Lingue e Linguaggio 12(2): 145–170.Google Scholar
2015 Action nouns in Romance. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1209–1229. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Co-opting exaptation in a theory of language change. In Exaptation in Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336], Muriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds), 57–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, Livio & Angster, Marco
2019 Stripping paradigmatic relations out of the syntax. Morphology 29(2): 249–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2010 Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Górska, Elżbieta
1994 Moonless nights and smoke-free cities, or what can be without what? A cognitive study of privative adjectives in English. Folia Linguistica 28(3–4): 413–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1991 The last stages of grammatical elements: Contractive and expansive desemanticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19(1)], Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 301–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1989 From purposive to infinitive. A universal path of grammaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10(1–2): 287–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1994 Phonogenesis. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 The paradigm at the end of the universe. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 147–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Booij, Geert
2014 From compounding to derivation. The emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica 48(2): 579–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter
1996 Verbal derivation in English: A historical survey or Much Ado About Nothing. In English Historical Linguistics 1994 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 135], Derek Britton (ed.), 93–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Volkmar
2015 Categories of word-formation. In Word Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1020–1034. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2020 Univerbation. Folia Linguistica Historica 41(1): 205–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno
1935 I prefissoidi (il tipo aeromobile, radiodiffusione). Archivio Glottologico Italiano 27: 13–39 (repr. in Idem (1963), Saggi sulla lingua del Novecento. Firenze: Sansoni, 9–60).Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
[1920] 1995 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer (English Translation by Herbert A. Strong. London: Longmans, Green and Co. 1891).Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand
[1916]1995 Cours de Linguistique Générale, edited by Tullio De Mauro. Paris: Payot (English Translation by Wade Baskin. New York NY: Philosophical Library 1959).Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob
1975 Die Prinzipien der deskriptiven und der etikettierenden Benennung. In Linguistic Workshop III. Arbeiten des Kölner Universalienprojekts, Hansjakob Seiler (ed), 2–57. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol
2005 Onomasiological approach to word-formation. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 207–232. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Christopher M.
2005 Revisiting the affixoid debate: On the grammaticalization of the word. In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds), 71–83. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory
2020 Paradigm Function Morphology: Assumptions and Innovations. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata
2009 Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel
2008 Oud-leerling versus ancien élève: A comparative study of adjectives grammaticalizing into prefixes in Dutch and French. Morphology 18: 27–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Marle, Jaap
1985 On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar