Part of
Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications
Edited by Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina and Cristina Lara-Clares
[Studies in Language Companion Series 225] 2022
► pp. 2156
References
Ackerman, Farrel, Blevins, James P. & Malouf, Robert
2009Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In Analogy in Grammar, James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds), 54–82. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antoniová, Vesna
2016Derivational paradigm – is there any? A contrastive research. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 13(2): 91–105. [URL]
Aronoff, Mark
1976Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007In the beginning was the word. Language 83: 803–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Corbett, Greville G. & Brown, Dunstan
(eds) 2010Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagasheva, Alexandra
2020Paradigmaticity in compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–48. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Derivational paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure 12(2): 153–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Thomas
1993Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P.
2001Paradigmatic derivation. Transactions of the Philological Society 99(2): 211–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bochner, Harry
1993Simplicity in Generative Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana
2019Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29(2): 167–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert & Lieber, Rochelle
2004On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42(2): 327–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
1993Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Autonomous morphology and paradigmatic relations. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 35–53. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013Morphology in Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 255–273. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Construction morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds), 424–448. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyé, Gilles & Schalchli, Gauvain
2016The status of paradigms. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Hippisley & Gregory T. Stump (eds), 206–234. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1988Morphology as lexical organization. In Theoretical Morphology, Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds), 119–141. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1995Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5): 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Beckner, Clay
2010Usage-based theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 827–856. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
1994Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70(4): 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbin, Danielle
1987Morphologie Dérivationnelle et Structuration du Lexique. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje & Kempf, Luise
2018Paradigmatic relationships in German action noun formation. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word-Formation 2: 52–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1989Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 42(1): 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furdík, Juraj
2004Slovenská slovotvorba (teória, opis, cvičenia). Prešov: Náuka.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio & Angster, Marco
2019Stripping paradigmatic relations out of the syntax. Morphology 29(2): 249–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giraudo, Hélène & Dal Maso, Serena
2018Towards a constructional approach of L2 morphological processing. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology 4], Geert Booij (ed.), 603–622. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio & Scalise, Sergio
2013Le Lingue e il Linguaggio: Introduzione alla Linguistica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Gurevich, Olga I.
2006Constructional Morphology: The Georgian Version. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Hathout, Nabil & Namer, Fiammetta
2014Démonette, a French derivational morpho-semantic network. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 11(5): 125–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Paradigms in word formation: What are we up to? Morphology 29: 153–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McClelland, James L. & Bybee, Joan
2007The gradience of gradience: A reply to Jackendoff. The Linguistic Review 24(4): 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pastizzo, Matthew J. & Feldman, Laurie B.
2004Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation. Brain and Language 90: 31–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1886Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Piccinin, Sabrina
2018Native and Non-Native Processing of Morphologically Complex Words in Italian. PhD dissertation, Università di Verona and Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès.
Pounder, Amanda
2000Process and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radimský, Jan
2020A paradigmatic approach to compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 164–185. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1916Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2015The scope of word-formation research. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
2013Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigm-Based Model. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanners, Robert F., Neiser, James J., Hernon, William P. & Hall, Roger
1979Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 399–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol
2014Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.
1991A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67: 675–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Referrals and morphomes in Sora verb inflection. In Yearbook of Morphology 2005, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 227–251. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna M.
2019Overabundance in morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Marle, Jaap
1984On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Paradigms. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ron E. Asher (ed.), 2927–2930. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter & Fabri, Ray
1995Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft / Journal of the Linguistic Society of Germany 14(2): 236–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich
1989Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Fábregas, Antonio
Iacobini, Claudio & Maria Pina De Rosa
Iordachioaia, Gianina
Popova, Gergana
2022. Chapter 12. English participles in the derivational paradigm. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Ševčíková, Magda & Hana Hledíková
2022. Chapter 8. Paradigms in English and Czech noun/verb conversion. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.