In recent times, paradigmatic approaches to word formation have become increasingly popular, but the very concept of derivational paradigm is still far from being clear and universally accepted: while paradigms are a useful construct for the treatment of inflectional phenomena, less straightforward is their adoption in the realm of derivation, which is characterized by numerous gaps and inconsistencies. The aim of our theoretical contribution is to discuss the representation that morphological entities and derivational relationships receive in paradigmatic approaches, especially those which are gaining popularity in recent developments of the research. Specifically, we will reflect on how word-internal and word-external morphological relationships are explained and modeled in different topological representations, starting from traditional organizations of cells in columns, to three-dimensional arrangements of morphological families, to schematic representations along the lines of the Construction Morphology framework and, finally, to Bybee’s multidimensional networks.
Ackerman, Farrel, Blevins, James P. & Malouf, Robert. 2009. Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In Analogy in Grammar, James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds), 54–82. Oxford: OUP.
Antoniová, Vesna. 2016. Derivational paradigm – is there any? A contrastive research. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 13(2): 91–105. <[URL]>
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark. 2007. In the beginning was the word. Language 83: 803–830.
Baerman, Matthew, Corbett, Greville G. & Brown, Dunstan (eds). 2010. Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us. Oxford: OUP.
Bagasheva, Alexandra. 2020. Paradigmaticity in compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–48. Leiden: Brill.
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP.
Bauer, Laurie. 1997. Derivational paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bauer, Laurie. 2019. Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure 12(2): 153–175.
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Becker, Thomas. 1993. Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Blevins, James P.2001. Paradigmatic derivation. Transactions of the Philological Society 99(2): 211–222.
Blevins, James P.2016. Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Bochner, Harry. 1993. Simplicity in Generative Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana. 2019. Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29(2): 167–197.
Booij, Geert & Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42(2): 327–357.
Booij, Geert. 1993. Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Booij, Geert. 1997. Autonomous morphology and paradigmatic relations. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 35–53. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Booij, Geert. 2013. Morphology in Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 255–273. Oxford: OUP.
Booij, Geert. 2017. Construction morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds), 424–448. Cambridge: CUP.
Boyé, Gilles & Schalchli, Gauvain. 2016. The status of paradigms. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Hippisley & Gregory T. Stump (eds), 206–234. Cambridge: CUP.
Bybee, Joan L.1988. Morphology as lexical organization. In Theoretical Morphology, Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds), 119–141. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5): 425–455.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.
Bybee, Joan L. & Beckner, Clay. 2010. Usage-based theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 827–856. Oxford: OUP.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70(4): 737–788.
Corbin, Danielle. 1987. Morphologie Dérivationnelle et Structuration du Lexique. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Dammel, Antje & Kempf, Luise. 2018. Paradigmatic relationships in German action noun formation. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word-Formation 2: 52–85.
Dressler, Wolfgang U.1989. Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 42(1): 3–10.
Gaeta, Livio & Angster, Marco. 2019. Stripping paradigmatic relations out of the syntax. Morphology 29(2): 249–270.
Giraudo, Hélène & Dal Maso, Serena. 2018. Towards a constructional approach of L2 morphological processing. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology 4], Geert Booij (ed.), 603–622. Cham: Springer.
Graffi, Giorgio & Scalise, Sergio. 2013. Le Lingue e il Linguaggio: Introduzione alla Linguistica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Gurevich, Olga I.2006. Constructional Morphology: The Georgian Version. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Hathout, Nabil & Namer, Fiammetta. 2014. Démonette, a French derivational morpho-semantic network. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 11(5): 125–168.
Hathout, Nabil & Namer, Fiammetta. 2019. Paradigms in word formation: What are we up to?Morphology 29: 153–165.
McClelland, James L. & Bybee, Joan. 2007. The gradience of gradience: A reply to Jackendoff. The Linguistic Review 24(4): 437–455.
Pastizzo, Matthew J. & Feldman, Laurie B.2004. Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation. Brain and Language 90: 31–39.
Paul, Hermann. 1886. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.
Piccinin, Sabrina. 2018. Native and Non-Native Processing of Morphologically Complex Words in Italian. PhD dissertation, Università di Verona and Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès.
Pounder, Amanda. 2000. Process and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Radimský, Jan. 2020. A paradigmatic approach to compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 164–185. Leiden: Brill.
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2015. The scope of word-formation research. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Spencer, Andrew. 2013. Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigm-Based Model. Oxford: OUP.
Stanners, Robert F., Neiser, James J., Hernon, William P. & Hall, Roger. 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 399–412.
Štekauer, Pavol. 2014. Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP.
Stump, Gregory T.1991. A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67: 675–725.
Stump, Gregory T.2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP.
Stump, Gregory T.2005. Referrals and morphomes in Sora verb inflection. In Yearbook of Morphology 2005, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 227–251. Dordrecht: Springer.
Thornton, Anna M.2019. Overabundance in morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
van Marle, Jaap. 1984. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.
van Marle, Jaap. 1994. Paradigms. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ron E. Asher (ed.), 2927–2930. Oxford: Pergamon.
Wunderlich, Dieter & Fabri, Ray. 1995. Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft / Journal of the Linguistic Society of Germany 14(2): 236–294.
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1989. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.