Part of
Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications
Edited by Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina and Cristina Lara-Clares
[Studies in Language Companion Series 225] 2022
► pp. 2156
References (58)
References
Ackerman, Farrel, Blevins, James P. & Malouf, Robert. 2009. Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In Analogy in Grammar, James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds), 54–82. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antoniová, Vesna. 2016. Derivational paradigm – is there any? A contrastive research. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 13(2): 91–105. <[URL]>
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. In the beginning was the word. Language 83: 803–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Corbett, Greville G. & Brown, Dunstan (eds). 2010. Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagasheva, Alexandra. 2020. Paradigmaticity in compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–48. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Derivational paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure 12(2): 153–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Thomas. 1993. Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2001. Paradigmatic derivation. Transactions of the Philological Society 99(2): 211–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bochner, Harry. 1993. Simplicity in Generative Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana. 2019. Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29(2): 167–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert & Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42(2): 327–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1993. Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Autonomous morphology and paradigmatic relations. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 35–53. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2013. Morphology in Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 255–273. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Construction morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds), 424–448. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyé, Gilles & Schalchli, Gauvain. 2016. The status of paradigms. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Hippisley & Gregory T. Stump (eds), 206–234. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1988. Morphology as lexical organization. In Theoretical Morphology, Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds), 119–141. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5): 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Beckner, Clay. 2010. Usage-based theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 827–856. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70(4): 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbin, Danielle. 1987. Morphologie Dérivationnelle et Structuration du Lexique. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje & Kempf, Luise. 2018. Paradigmatic relationships in German action noun formation. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word-Formation 2: 52–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1989. Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 42(1): 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furdík, Juraj. 2004. Slovenská slovotvorba (teória, opis, cvičenia). Prešov: Náuka.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio & Angster, Marco. 2019. Stripping paradigmatic relations out of the syntax. Morphology 29(2): 249–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giraudo, Hélène & Dal Maso, Serena. 2018. Towards a constructional approach of L2 morphological processing. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology 4], Geert Booij (ed.), 603–622. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio & Scalise, Sergio. 2013. Le Lingue e il Linguaggio: Introduzione alla Linguistica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Gurevich, Olga I. 2006. Constructional Morphology: The Georgian Version. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Hathout, Nabil & Namer, Fiammetta. 2014. Démonette, a French derivational morpho-semantic network. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 11(5): 125–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Paradigms in word formation: What are we up to? Morphology 29: 153–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McClelland, James L. & Bybee, Joan. 2007. The gradience of gradience: A reply to Jackendoff. The Linguistic Review 24(4): 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pastizzo, Matthew J. & Feldman, Laurie B. 2004. Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation. Brain and Language 90: 31–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1886. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Piccinin, Sabrina. 2018. Native and Non-Native Processing of Morphologically Complex Words in Italian. PhD dissertation, Università di Verona and Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès.
Pounder, Amanda. 2000. Process and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radimský, Jan. 2020. A paradigmatic approach to compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 164–185. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2015. The scope of word-formation research. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2013. Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigm-Based Model. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanners, Robert F., Neiser, James J., Hernon, William P. & Hall, Roger. 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 399–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol. 2014. Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 1991. A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67: 675–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Referrals and morphomes in Sora verb inflection. In Yearbook of Morphology 2005, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 227–251. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna M. 2019. Overabundance in morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Marle, Jaap. 1984. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Paradigms. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ron E. Asher (ed.), 2927–2930. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter & Fabri, Ray. 1995. Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft / Journal of the Linguistic Society of Germany 14(2): 236–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1989. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Iacobini, Claudio & Maria Pina De Rosa
Fábregas, Antonio
Iordachioaia, Gianina
2022. Paradigmatic aspects of deverbal noun conversion in English. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Popova, Gergana
2022. English participles in the derivational paradigm. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Ševčíková, Magda & Hana Hledíková
2022. Paradigms in English and Czech noun/verb conversion. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.