Part of
Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications
Edited by Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina and Cristina Lara-Clares
[Studies in Language Companion Series 225] 2022
► pp. 2156
References
Ackerman, Farrel, Blevins, James P. & Malouf, Robert
2009Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In Analogy in Grammar, James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds), 54–82. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antoniová, Vesna
2016Derivational paradigm – is there any? A contrastive research. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 13(2): 91–105. [URL]
Aronoff, Mark
1976Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007In the beginning was the word. Language 83: 803–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Corbett, Greville G. & Brown, Dunstan
(eds) 2010Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagasheva, Alexandra
2020Paradigmaticity in compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–48. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Derivational paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure 12(2): 153–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Thomas
1993Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P.
2001Paradigmatic derivation. Transactions of the Philological Society 99(2): 211–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bochner, Harry
1993Simplicity in Generative Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana
2019Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29(2): 167–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert & Lieber, Rochelle
2004On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42(2): 327–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
1993Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Autonomous morphology and paradigmatic relations. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 35–53. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013Morphology in Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 255–273. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Construction morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds), 424–448. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyé, Gilles & Schalchli, Gauvain
2016The status of paradigms. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Hippisley & Gregory T. Stump (eds), 206–234. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1988Morphology as lexical organization. In Theoretical Morphology, Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds), 119–141. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1995Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5): 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Beckner, Clay
2010Usage-based theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 827–856. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
1994Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70(4): 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbin, Danielle
1987Morphologie Dérivationnelle et Structuration du Lexique. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje & Kempf, Luise
2018Paradigmatic relationships in German action noun formation. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word-Formation 2: 52–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1989Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 42(1): 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furdík, Juraj
2004Slovenská slovotvorba (teória, opis, cvičenia). Prešov: Náuka.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio & Angster, Marco
2019Stripping paradigmatic relations out of the syntax. Morphology 29(2): 249–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giraudo, Hélène & Dal Maso, Serena
2018Towards a constructional approach of L2 morphological processing. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology 4], Geert Booij (ed.), 603–622. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio & Scalise, Sergio
2013Le Lingue e il Linguaggio: Introduzione alla Linguistica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Gurevich, Olga I.
2006Constructional Morphology: The Georgian Version. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Hathout, Nabil & Namer, Fiammetta
2014Démonette, a French derivational morpho-semantic network. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 11(5): 125–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Paradigms in word formation: What are we up to? Morphology 29: 153–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McClelland, James L. & Bybee, Joan
2007The gradience of gradience: A reply to Jackendoff. The Linguistic Review 24(4): 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pastizzo, Matthew J. & Feldman, Laurie B.
2004Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation. Brain and Language 90: 31–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1886Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Piccinin, Sabrina
2018Native and Non-Native Processing of Morphologically Complex Words in Italian. PhD dissertation, Università di Verona and Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès.
Pounder, Amanda
2000Process and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radimský, Jan
2020A paradigmatic approach to compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 164–185. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1916Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2015The scope of word-formation research. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
2013Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigm-Based Model. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanners, Robert F., Neiser, James J., Hernon, William P. & Hall, Roger
1979Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 399–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol
2014Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.
1991A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67: 675–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Referrals and morphomes in Sora verb inflection. In Yearbook of Morphology 2005, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 227–251. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna M.
2019Overabundance in morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Marle, Jaap
1984On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Paradigms. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ron E. Asher (ed.), 2927–2930. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter & Fabri, Ray
1995Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft / Journal of the Linguistic Society of Germany 14(2): 236–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich
1989Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fábregas, Antonio
Iordachioaia, Gianina
Popova, Gergana
2022. Chapter 12. English participles in the derivational paradigm. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Ševčíková, Magda & Hana Hledíková
2022. Chapter 8. Paradigms in English and Czech noun/verb conversion. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.