Chapter 4
Fact-checking on compound verbs in English
The creation of compound verbs remains among the most contested phenomena of English word formation and the studies targeting these units have normally portrayed them as inconsistent or almost anomalous. This perception, together with the heterogeneous origins and the contested status of compound verbs, might explain why two central questions remain unanswered: (i) are these genuine compounds? and (ii) how can they be analyzed in a uniform manner? This paper tackles English verbal compounding with two hypotheses in mind: (i) that it is crucial to differentiate between a product- and a process-oriented approach to the phenomenon, and (ii) that a paradigm-based analysis acknowledging the role of analogy and the weight of metonymy proves highly beneficial.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.What does genuine mean in genuine compound verbs?
- 2.1On verbal compounds
- 2.2Genuineness of compound verbs in English
- 3.What is actually behind compound verbs in English
- 3.1Basics of paradigmatic approaches to word formation
- 3.2The nature of paradigms in compounding
- 3.3The role of metonymy in compound verbs
- 4.Compound verbs in English
- 5.Should verbal compounding be regarded as a productive process for genuine compound verbs to continue arising?
- 6.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References (100)
References
Aarts, Bas. 2011. Oxford Modern English Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. 

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edn. 2000. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1982. Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine. 2015. Word-formation and analogy. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 822–841. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 

Bagasheva, Alexandra. 2015. Paradigmatic word-formation, metonymy and compound verbs in English and Bulgarian. In Morphology and Semantics – MMM9 On-line Proceedings, Jenny Audring, Nikos Koutsoukos, Francesca Masini & Ida Raffaelli (eds), 1–11. <[URL]> (21 October 2020).
Bagasheva, Alexandra. 2020. Paradigmaticity in compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–48. Leiden: Brill. 

Barsalou, Lawrence & Hale, Christopher. 1993. Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames. In Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis, Iven Van Mechelen, James Hampton, Ryszard S. Michalski & Peter Theuns (eds), 97–144. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. 

Bauer, Laurie. 1997. Derivational paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 

Bauer, Laurie. 2008. Dvandva. Word Structure 1(1): 1–20. 

Bauer, Laurie. 2017. Compounds and Compounding. Cambridge: CUP. 

Bauer, Laurie. 2019. Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure 12(2): 153–175. 

Bauer, Laurie & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Lexical word-formation. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 1621–1721. Cambridge: CUP. 

Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. 

Becker, Thomas. 1993. Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 

Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morten H., William Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., Holland, John, Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Schoenemann, Tom (The “Five Graces Group”). 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. In Language as a Complex Adaptive System, Nick C. Ellis & Diane Larsen-Freeman (eds), 1–26. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 

Bell, Melanie. 2013. The English Noun Noun Construct: Its Prosody and Structure. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Booij, Geert. 1993. Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 27–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 

Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Booij, Geert. 2016. Construction morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds), 424–448. Cambridge: CUP. 

Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian, Mudgan, Joachim & Skopeteas, Stravos (eds). 2004. Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 

Brukette, Allison & Kretzschmar, William. 2018. Exploring Linguistic Science: Language Use, Complexity, and Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. 

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2002. An Introduction to English Morphology: Words and Their Structure. Edinburgh: EUP.
Collins English Dictionary, 5th edn. 2015. Glasgow: Harper Collins.
Concise Oxford Dictionary, 10th edn. 2003. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Di Sciullo, Anna M. & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Díaz-Negrillo, Ana. 2020. Neoclassical word formation in English: A paradigm-based account of -scope formations. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 213–261. Leiden: Brill. 

Donalies, Elke. 2004. Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. Kombinatorische Begriffsbildung: Substantivkomposition. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
Downing, Angela & Locke, Philip. 2006. English Grammar: A University Course, 2nd edn. Abingdon: Routledge. 

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2005. Word-formation in natural morphology. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 267–284. Dordrecht: Springer. 

Erdmann, Peter. 2009. Compound verbs. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 38–59. Cambridge: CUP. 

Farrell, Patrick. 2001. Functional shift as category underspecification. English Language & Linguistics 5: 109–130. 

Fillmore, Charles. 2006. Frame semantics. In Cognitive Linguistics. Basic Readings, Dirk Geeraerts (ed), 373–400. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 

FrameNet. 2021. <[URL]> (27 March 2021).
Frank, Roslyn. 2015a. A complex adaptive systems approach to language, cultural schemas and serial metonymy: Charting the cognitive innovations of ‘fingers’ and ‘claws’ in Basque. In Metaphor and Metonymy across Time and Cultures. Perspectives on the Sociohistorical Linguistics of Figurative Language, Javier E. Díaz Vera (ed), 65–95. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 

Frank, Roslyn. 2015b. A future agenda for research on language and culture. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture, Farzad Sharifian (ed), 493–513. New York NY: Routledge.
Gagné, Christina L. & Spalding, Thomas L. 2015. Semantics, concepts, and meta-cognition: Attributing properties and meanings to complex concepts. In Semantics of Complex Words, Laurie Bauer, Livia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 9–27. Dordrecht: Springer. 

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1999. Speaking and thinking with metonymy. In Metonymy in Language and Thought [Human Cognitive Processing 4], Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günter Radden (eds), 61–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Goldberg, Adele E. 2010. Verbs, constructions, and semantic frames. In Lexical Semantics, Syntax and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 39–58. Oxford: OUP. 

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Guerssel, Mohand. 1983. A lexical approach to word formation in English. Linguistic Analysis 12: 183–243.
Hall, Robert A. 1956. How we noun-incorporate in English. American Speech 31(2): 83–88. 

Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 2004. The discourse basis for lexical categories in Universal Grammar. In Fuzzy Grammar: A Reader, Bas Aarts, David Denison, Evelien Keizer & Gergana Popova (eds), 247–291. Oxford: OUP.
Horecký, Ján, Buzássyová, Klára & Bosák, Ján. 1989. Dynamika slovnej zásoby súčasnej slovenčiny. Bratislava: Veda.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. 

Janda, Laura. 2011. Metonymy in word formation. Cognitive Linguistics 22(2): 359–392. 

Kastovsky, Dieter. 1986. Problems in the morphological analysis of complex lexical items. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36: 93–107. <[URL]>
Klingebiel, Kathryn. 1989. Noun+Verb Compounding in Western Romance. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Lamberty, Angela. 2014. Why We Don’t Cardrive or Bookread, but Slavedrive and Lipread. A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Verbal Compounds and Pseudo-Compounds in English. Darmstadt: Büchner. 

Lamberty, Angela & Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2013. Verbal compounding in English: A challenge for usage-based models of word-formation? Anglia 131(4): 591–626. 

Lexico. 2021. <[URL]> (10 March 2021).
Libben, Gary. 2006. Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In The Representation and Processing of Compound Words, Gary Libben & Gonia Jarema (eds), 1–22. Oxford: OUP. 

Libben, Gary. 2008. Compounding and cognition. ICCS Proceedings, 27–29 July 2008, Seoul, Korea.
Libben, Gary. 2012. Morphological assessment in bilingual aphasia: Compounding and the language nexus. In Aspects of Multilingual Aphasia, Martin R. Gitterman, Mira Goral, & Loraine K. Obler (eds), 51–88. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 

Libben, Gary. 2014. The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31(1–2): 8–25. 

Libben, Gary. 2019. Words as action: Consequences for the monolingual and bilingual lexicon. In The Description, Measurement and Pedagogy of Words, Alexandra Tsedryk & Christine Doe (eds), 14–33. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Lieber, Rochelle. 1981. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Lieber, Rochelle. 2005. English word-formation processes. Observations, issues, and thoughts on future research. In Handbook of Word Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 375–427. Dordrecht: Springer. 

Lieber, Rochelle. 2009. IE, Germanic: English. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 357–370. Oxford: OUP. 

Lieber, Rochelle & Scalise, Sergio. 2006. The Lexical Integrity Hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. Lingue e Linguaggio 5: 7–32. 

Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds). 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: OUP. 

Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach, 2nd edn. München: C.H. Beck.
Matthews, Peter H. 1972. Inflectional Morphology. A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation. Cambridge: CUP.
McGregor, William B. 2002. Verb Classification in Australian Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 

Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edn. 2009. Springfield MA: Merriam-Webster.
Mohanan, Karuvannur P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Nagano, Akiko. 2007. Marchand’s analysis of back-formation revisited: Back-formation as a type of conversion. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54(1): 33–72. 

Pennanen, Esko V. 1966. Contributions to the Study of Back-Formation in English. Tampere: Yhteiskunnallinen Korkeakoulu.
Plag, Ingo, Kunter, Gero, Lappe, Sabine & Braun, Maria. 2008. The role of semantics, argument structure, and lexicalization in compound stress assignment in English. Language 84(4): 760–794. 

PONS Online Dictionary. 2021. <[URL]> (30 March 2021).
Postal, Paul. 1969. Anaphoric islands. Chicago Linguistic Society 5: 205–239.
Quinlan, Philip & Dyson, Ben. 2008. Cognitive Psychology. Edinburgh: Pearson.
Radimský, Jan. 2019. A paradigmatic account of lexical innovation: The role of repeated components in French N+N compounds. In Morphology and Semantics – MMM12 Online Proceedings, Jenny Audring, Nikos Koutsoukos & Christina Manouilidou (eds), 77–91. <[URL]> (6 November 2020).
Radimský, Jan. 2020. A paradigmatic approach to compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 164–185. Leiden: Brill. 

Rainer, Franz. 2003. Typology, diachrony, and universals of semantic change in word-formation: A Romanist’s look at the polysemy of agent nouns. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4), Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi & Sergio Scalise (eds). <[URL]> (21 September 2020).
Renner, Vincent. 2008. On the semantics of English coordinate compounds. English Studies 89(5): 606–613. 

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. 2011. Metonymy and cognitive operations. In Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics [Human Cognitive Processing 28], Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds), 103–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta. 2009. The classification of compounds. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 49–82. Oxford: OUP. 

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2011. English Morphology and Word-Formation. An Introduction. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Štekauer, Pavol. 2014. Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. 

Štekauer, Pavol & Lieber, Rochelle (eds). 2005. Handbook of Word Formation. Dordrecht: Springer. 

Szymanek, Bogdan. 2005. The latest trends in English word- formation. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 428–448. Dordrecht: Springer. 

The Daily Telegraph (March 15, 2002). <[URL]> (20 January 2019).
The Guardian (February 13, 1999). <[URL]> (24 January 2019).
The New Yorker (October 12, 2009). <[URL]> (15 February 2019).
Ungerer, Friedrich. 2007. Word-formation. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts & Huberts Cuyckens (eds), 650–676. Oxford: OUP. 

van Gelderen, Elly. 2016. Features and affix-hop. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63(1): 1–22. 

van Marle, Jaap. 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.
van Marle, Jaap. 1996. The unity of morphology: On the intervowenness of the derivational and inflectional dimension of the word. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 67–82. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 

Wald, Benji & Besserman, Lawrence. 2002. The emergence of the verb-verb compound in twentieth century English and twentieth century linguistics. In Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective, Donka Minkova & Robert Stockwell (eds), 417–447. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 

Word Spy. 2021. <[URL]> (15 November 2020).
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.