Chapter 5
Paradigm families in compounding
The case of English compound nouns headed by -er deverbal nouns
This chapter demonstrates the applicability of the notion of derivational paradigms and word-formation families to the study of compounds. Three families of English compounds are investigated which are headed by deverbal -er nominals. The semantic homogeneity of each of those compound families is assessed by analysing data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), supplemented by some lexicographic searches and web searches. This involves the examination of the polysemy of the head nouns, the implicit semantic relation between compound elements and the transparency (or opacity) of the compounds which belong to the selected compound families. Comments are provided on the use of construction schemas to generalize over the internal structure and semantic interpretation of compound families (or subfamilies).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Polysemy of deverbal -er nouns
- 3.Semantic relationships between constituents of NN compounds
- 4.NN compounds headed by puller
- 4.1The range of meanings of the head noun puller
- 4.2Semantic relationships between compound constituents: Transparency/opacity of N+puller compounds
- 5.NN compounds headed by the noun eater
- 5.1The range of meanings of the head noun eater
- 5.2Semantic relationships between compound constituents: Transparency/opacity of N+eater compounds
- 6.NN compounds headed by charmer
- 6.1The range of meanings of the head noun charmer
- 6.2Semantic relationships between compound constituents: Transparency/opacity of N+charmer compounds
- 7.[N V-er] compounds and construction schemas
- 8.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
Abbreviations
-
References
References
Adams, Valerie
1973 An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation. London: Longman.
Arcodia, Giorgio F.
2012 Construction and headedness in derivation and compounding.
Morphology 22: 365–397.
Baayen, Harald
1993 On frequency, transparency and productivity. In
Yearbook of Morphology 1992,
Geert Booij &
Jaap van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bagasheva, Alexandra
2020 Paradigmaticity in compounding. In
Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation,
Jesús Fernández-Domínguez,
Alexandra Bagasheva &
Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–48. Leiden: Brill.
Bauer, Laurie
1997 Derivational paradigms. In
Yearbook of Morphology 1996,
Geert Booij &
Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bauer, Laurie
2019 Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation.
Word Structure 12(2): 153–175.
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Bauer, Laurie & Tarasova, Elizaveta
2013 The meaning link in nominal compounds.
SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 10(3): 2–18.
[URL]
Booij, Geert
1986 Form and meaning in morphology: The case of Dutch ‘agent nouns’.
Linguistics 24(3): 503–517.
Booij, Geert
2007 Construction morphology and the lexicon. In
Selected Proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse,
Fabio Montermini,
Gilles Boyé &
Nabil Hathout (eds), 34–44. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
[URL]
Booij, Geert
2010a Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Booij, Geert
2010b Construction Morphology.
Language and Linguistic Compass 4(7): 543–555.
Booij, Geert
2013 Morphology in Construction Grammar. In
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar,
Thomas Hoffmann &
Graeme Trousdale (eds), 255–273. Oxford: OUP.
Booij, Geert & Lieber, Rochelle
2004 On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch.
Linguistics 42(2): 327–357.
Bourque, Yves
2014 Towards a Typology of Semantic Transparency: The Case of French Compounds. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
[URL]
Bundgaard, Peer F., Ostergaard, Sven & Stjernfelt, Frederik
2006 Waterproof fire stations? Conceptual schemata and cognitive operations involved in compound constructions.
Semiotica 161(1–4): 363–393.
Bybee, Joan L.
2013 Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar,
Thomas Hoffmann &
Graeme Trousdale (eds), 49–69. Oxford: OUP.
Cambridge Dictionary
2021 <
[URL]> (
30 March 2021).
Cetnarowska, Bożena
1993 The Syntax, Semantics and Derivations of Bare Nominalisations in English. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
[URL]
Collins Dictionary
2021 <
[URL]> (
30 March 2021).
Davies, Mark
2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA).
[URL]> (
30 March 2021).
Dictionary
2021 <
[URL]> (
30 March 2021).
Downing, Pamela
1977 On the creation and use of English compound nouns.
Language 53(4): 810–842.
Educalingo. The Dictionary for Curious People
2021 <
[URL]> (
30 March 2021).
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús
2016 The semantics of primary nn compounds: From form to meaning, and from meaning to form. In
The Semantics of Compounding,
Pius ten Hacken (ed), 129–150. Cambridge: CUP.
Furdík, Juraj
2004 Slovenská slovotvorba (teória, opis, cvičenia). Prešov: Náuka.
Gaeta, Livio & Angster, Marco
2019 Stripping paradigmatic relations out of the syntax.
Morphology 29: 249–270.
Hatcher, Anna Granville
1960 An introduction to the analysis of English noun compounds.
Word 16: 356–373.
Jackendoff, Ray
2010 Meaning and the Lexicon. The Parallel Architecture, 1975–2010. Oxford: OUP.
Jackendoff, Ray
2016 English noun-noun compounds in Conceptual Semantics. In
The Semantics of Compounding,
Pius ten Hacken (ed), 15–37. Cambridge: CUP.
Lakoff, George & Kövecses, Zoltán
1987 The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In
Cultural Models in Language and Thought,
Dorothy C. Holland &
Naomi Quinn (eds), 195–221. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
Levi, Judith N.
1978 The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York NY: Academic Press.
Lieber, Rochelle
1992 Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lieber, Rochelle
2004 Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
Masini, Francesca & Audring, Jenny
2019 Construction Morphology. In
The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory,
Jenny Audring &
Francesca Masini (eds), 365–389. Oxford: OUP.
Mattiello, Elisa & Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2018 The morphosemantic transparency/opacity of novel English analogical compounds and compound families.
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 53: 67–114.
Melloni, Chiara
2010 Action nominals inside: Lexical-semantic issues. In
The Semantics of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks,
Monika Rathert &
Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 141–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
2021 <
[URL]> (
30 March 2021).
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas
1994 Idioms.
Language 70(3): 491–538.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda
2001 A conceptual analysis of -er nominals. In
Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy,
Martin Pütz,
Susanne Niemeier &
René Dirven (eds), 149–200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pepper, Steve
2020 The Typology and Semantics of Binominal Lexemes: Noun Noun Compounds and their Functional Equivalents. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.
[URL]
Radden, Günter & Dirven, René
Radimský, Jan
2020 A paradigmatic approach to compounding. In
Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation,
Jesús Fernández-Domínguez,
Alexandra Bagasheva &
Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 164–185. Leiden: Brill.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
1992 -er nominals: Implications for the theory of argument structure. In
Syntax and the Lexicon,
Tim Stowell &
Eric Wehrli (eds), 127–153. Leiden: Brill.
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta
2009 The classification of compounds. In
The Oxford Handbook of Compounding,
Rochelle Lieber &
Pavol Štekauer (eds), 49–82. Oxford: OUP.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2011 English Morphology and Word-Formation, 2nd edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1982 The Syntax of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Štekauer, Pavol
2014 Derivational paradigms. In
The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology,
Rochelle Lieber &
Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP.
Tarasova, Elizaveta
2013 Some New Insights into the Semantics of English N+N Compounds. PhD dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.
[URL]
ten Hacken, Pius
2009 Early generative approaches. In
The Oxford Handbook of Compounding,
Rochelle Lieber &
Pavol Štekauer (eds), 54–77. Oxford: OUP.
The Free Dictionary
2021 <
[URL] (30 March 2021).
Urban Dictionary
2021 <
[URL] (30 March 2021).
Warren, Beatrice
1978 Semantic Patterns of Noun-Noun Compounds. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Göthoburgensis.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.