Chapter 8
Paradigms in English and Czech noun/verb conversion
A contrastive study of corresponding lexemes
The study deals with English noun/verb conversion pairs that have both formally and semantically close counterpart pairs in Czech. The study’s aim is to examine how these nouns and verbs, linked with similar semantic relations in English and Czech, are accommodated in the two languages with different morphological structures and conversion playing a different role. The noun/verb pairs, extracted from the British National Corpus and from the SYN2000 corpus, are analysed as two-cell paradigms and examined along with selected derivatives. The data suggest that in the Czech sample, nominals are preferred over verbs in expressing the particular meanings and most verbs appear as denominal formations, often differently from their English counterparts.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Noun/verb conversion and the paradigmatic approach to word formation
- 2.1Conversion in English and Czech
- 2.2Applying a paradigmatic approach to conversion
- 3.Data compilation
- 3.1Extraction of the parallel sample
- 3.2Semantic classification
- 3.3Extension of the paradigms; competing formations
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Paradigms based on conversion pairs of verbs and action nouns
- 4.2Paradigms based on conversion pairs of verbs and agent nouns
- 4.3Paradigms based on conversion pairs of verbs and nouns expressing state
- 4.4Paradigms based on conversion pairs of verbs and result nouns
- 4.5Paradigms based on conversion pairs of verbs and instrument nouns
- 4.6Paradigms based on conversion pairs of verbs and nouns that refer to an object/quality_added
- 4.7Paradigms based on conversion pairs of verbs and nouns that refer to object/quality_removed
- 4.8Paradigms based on conversion pairs of verbs and place nouns
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Differences between the English and the Czech paradigms
- 5.2Verbs in the Czech conversion pairs: The aspect changing strategy
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References
Aronoff, Mark & Fuhrhop, Nanna
2002 Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20: 451–490.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bagasheva, Alexandra
2017 Comparative semantic concepts in affixation. In
Competing Patterns in English Affixation,
Juan Santana-Lario &
Salvador Valera (eds), 33–65. Bern: Peter Lang.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie
2002 What you can do with derivational morphology. In
Morphology 2000: Selected Papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, 24–28 February 2000 [
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 218],
Sabrina Bendjaballah,
Wolfgang U. Dressler,
Oskar E. Pfeiffer,
Maria D. Voeikova (eds), 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie
2019 Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation.
Word Structure 12(2): 153–175.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie & Valera, Salvador
(eds) 2005 Approaches to Conversion/Zero-Derivation. Münster: Waxmann.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beecher, Henry
2004 Derivational paradigm in word formation.
[URL] (22 April 2022).
Bergenholtz, Henning & Mugdan, Joachim
1979 Ist Liebe primär? Über Ableitung und Wortarten. In
Deutsche Gegenwartssprache. Entwicklungen, Entwürfe, Diskussionen,
Peter Braun (ed.), 339–354. München: Fink.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana
2019 Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology.
Morphology 29(2): 167–197.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bram, Barli
2011 Major Total Conversion in English: The Question of Directionality. PhD dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.
[URL]
British National Corpus (BNC)
Campbell, Lyle
1993 On proposed universals of grammatical borrowing. In
Historical Linguistics 1989. Papers from the 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 106],
Henk Aertsen &
Robert Jeffers (eds), 91–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Čermák, František, Blatná, Renata, Hlaváčová, Jaroslava, Klímová, Jana, Kocek, Jan, Kopřivová, Marie, Křen, Michal, Petkevič, Vladimír, Schmiedtová, Věra & Šulc, Michal
2000 SYN2000: A Genre-Balanced Corpus of Written Czech. Prague: Faculty of Arts.
[URL] (4 August 2020).
Cetnarowska, Bożena
1993 The Syntax, Semantics and Derivations of Bare Nominalisations in English. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
[URL]
Cetnarowska, Bożena
1996 Constraints on suffixless derivation in Polish and English: The case of action nouns. In
A Festschrift for Edmund Gussmann from his Friends and Colleagues,
Henryk Kardela &
Bogdan Szymanek (eds), 15–28. Lublin: The University Press of the Catholic University of Lublin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Eve V. & Clark, Herbert H.
1979 When nouns surface as verbs.
Language 55(4): 767–811.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daneš, František, Dokulil, Miloš & Kuchař, Jaroslav
1967 Tvoření slov v češtině 2: Odvozování podstatných jmen. Praha: Nakladatelství ČSAV.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dietz, Klaus
2015 Foreign word-formation in English. In
Word-Formation. An International Handbook of Languages of Europe, Vol. 3,
Peter O. Müller,
Ingeborg Ohnheiser,
Susan Olsen &
Franz Rainer (eds), 1637–1660. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dokulil, Miloš
1962 Tvoření slov v češtině, 1:
Teorie odvozování slov. Praha: Nakladatelství ČSAV.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dokulil, Miloš
1968a Zur Frage der Konversion und verwandter Wortbildungsvorgänge und -beziehungen.
Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 3: 215–239.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dokulil, Miloš
1968b Zur Frage der sog. Nullableitung. In
Wortbildung, Syntax und Morphologie. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Hans Marchand am 1. Oktober 1967,
Herbert E. Berkle &
Leonhard Lipka (eds), 55–64. The Hague: Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dokulil, Miloš
1982 K otázce slovnědruhových převodů a přechodů, zvl. transpozice.
Slovo a slovesnost 43: 257–271.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dokulil, Miloš, Horálek, Karel, Hůrková, Jiřina, Knappová, Miloslava & Petr, Jan
1986 Mluvnice češtiny, 1:
Fonetika, fonologie, morfonologie a morfematika, tvoření slov. Praha: Academia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Don, Jan
1993 Morphological Conversion. Utrecht: LEd.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Don, Jan
2005 On conversion, relisting and zero-derivation.
SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(2): 2–16.
[URL]
Don, Jan, Trommelen, Mieke & Zonneveld, Wim
2000 Conversion and category indeterminacy. In
Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Vol. 1,
Geert Booij,
Christian Lehmann &
Joachim Mugdan (eds), 943–952. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dušková, Libuše
[1988]2006 Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny, 3rd edn. Praha: Academia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Efthymiou, Angeliki
2013 How many factors influence the meaning of denominal and deadjectival verbs? The case of Modern Greek verbs in -(ι)άζω. In
The Semantics of Word Formation and Lexicalization,
Pius ten Hacken &
Claire Thomas (eds), 225–246. Edinburgh: EUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eins, Wieland
2015 Types of foreign word-formation. In
Word-Formation. An International Handbook of Languages of Europe, Vol. 3,
Peter O. Müller,
Ingeborg Ohnheiser,
Susan Olsen &
Franz Rainer (eds), 1531–1579. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina
2017 Availability and unavailability in English word-formation. In
Competing Patterns in English Affixation,
Juan Santana-Lario &
Salvador Valera (eds), 163–206. Bern: Peter Lang.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina & Čermák, Jan
2018 Derivational paradigms and competition in English: A diachronic study on competing causative verbs and their derivatives.
SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 15(3): 69–97.
[URL]
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús, Bagasheva, Alexandra & Lara-Clares, Cristina
(eds) 2020 Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation. Leiden: Brill.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filipec, Josef, Daneš, František, Machač, Jaroslav & Mejstřík, Vladimír
1998 Slovník spisovné češtiny pro školu a veřejnost, 2nd edn. Praha: Academia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fradin, Bernard
2020 Characterizing derivational paradigms. In
Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation,
Jesús Fernández-Domínguez,
Alexandra Bagasheva &
Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 49–84. Leiden: Brill.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Furdík, Juraj
2004 Slovenská slovotvorba (teória, opis, cvičenia). Prešov: Náuka.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gaeta, Livio
2015 Restrictions in word-formation. In
Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2,
Peter O. Müller,
Ingeborg Ohnheiser,
Susan Olsen,
Franz Rainer (eds), 859–875. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Havránek, Bohuslav, Bělič, Jaromír, Helcl, Miloš & Jedlička, Alois
1960–71 Slovník spisovného jazyka českého. Praha: Academia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horecký, Ján, Buzássyová, Klára & Bosák, Ján
1989 Dynamika slovnej zásoby súčasnej slovenčiny. Bratislava: Veda.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kastovsky, Dieter
1989 Typological changes in the history of English word formation. In
Anglistentag 1988, Göttingen: Vorträge,
Heinz-Joachim Müllenbrock &
Renate Noll-Wiemann (eds), 281–293. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Körtvélyessy, Lívia, Bagasheva, Alexandra & Štekauer, Pavol
(eds) 2020 Derivational Networks across Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kraus, Jiří, Buchtelová, Růžena, Confortiová, Helena, Červená, Vlasta, Holubová, Václava, Hovorková, Mariana, Churavý, Miloslav, Klímová, Jana, Kroupová, Libuše, Ludvíková, Marie, Machač, Jaroslav, Mejstřík, Vladimír, Petráčková, Věra, Poštolková, Běla, Roudný, Miroslav, Schmiedtová, Věra, Šroufková, Miloslava & Ungermann, Vladimír
2005 Nový akademický slovník cizích slov. Praha: Academia
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Křen, Michal, Cvrček, Václav, Čapka, Tomáš, Čermáková, Anna, Hnátková, Milena, Chlumská, Lucie, Jelínek, Tomáš, Kováříková, Dominika, Petkevič, Vladimír, Procházka, Pavel, Skoumalová, Hana, Škrabal, Michal, Truneček, Petr, Vondřička, Pavel & Zasina, Adrian Jan
2019 SYNv8 Corpus (from 12. 12. 2019). Prague: Institute of Czech National Corpus, Faculty of Arts, Charles University.
[URL] (4 August 2020).
Lara-Clares, Cristina
2017 Competition in Present Day English nominalization by zero-affixation vs. -ation. In
Competing Patterns in English Affixation,
Juan Santana-Lario &
Salvador Valera (eds), 207–244. Bern: Peter Lang.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, Rochelle
2004 Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, Rochelle
2006 The category of roots and the roots of categories: What we learn from selection in derivation.
Morphology 16(2): 247–272.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malá, Markéta & Šaldová, Pavlína
2012 Complex condensation – Vilém Mathesius, Josef Vachek, Jiří Nosek, and beyond. In
A Centenary of English Studies at Charles University: From Mathesius to Present-Day Linguistics,
Markéta Malá &
Pavlína Šaldová (eds), 135–158. Prague: Filozofická fakulta UK.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manova, Stela
2011 Understanding Morphological Rules. With Special Emphasis on Conversion and Subtraction in Bulgarian, Russian and Serbo-Croatian. Dordrecht: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manova, Stela & Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2005 The morphological technique of conversion in the inflecting-fusional type. In
Approaches to Conversion/Zero-Derivation,
Laurie Bauer &
Salvador Valera (eds), 67–101. Münster: Waxmann.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchand, Hans
1963 On a question of contrary analysis with derivationally connected but morphologically uncharacterized words.
English Studies 44: 176–187.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchand, Hans
1964 A set of criteria for the establishing of derivational relationship between words unmarked by derivational morphemes.
Indogermanische Forschungen 69: 10–19.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchand, Hans
[1960] 1969 The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach, 2nd edn. München: C.H. Beck.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martincová, Olga, Mejstřík, Vladimír, Rangelová, Albena, Holubová, Václava, Opavská, Zdeňka, Tichá, Zdeňka, Tintěrová, Ivona, Voborská, Milada & Schmiedtová, Věra
1998 Nová slova v češtině. Slovník neologizmů 1. Praha: Academia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martincová, Olga, Mejstřík, Vladimír, Janovec, Ladislav, Mravinacová, Jitka, Opavská, Zdeňka, Rangelová, Albena, Světlá, Jindra, Šmídová, Pavla, Tichá, Zdeňka & Tintěrová, Ivona
2004 Nová slova v češtině. Slovník neologizmů 2. Praha: Academia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathesius, Vilém
1936 Nebojte se angličtiny! Praha: Orbis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McIntyre, Andrew
2015 Denominal verbs. In
Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2,
Peter O. Müller,
Ingeborg Ohnheiser,
Susan Olsen, &
Franz Rainer (eds), 1406–1424. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Melloni, Chiara & Dal Maso, Serena
2022 For a topology of derivational paradigms. In
Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and Applications [
Studies in Language Companion Series 225],
Alba E. Ruz,
Cristina Fernández-Alcaina &
Cristina Lara-Clares (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Millet, Yves
1958 Les Postverbaux en Tchèque. Paris: Institute d’études slaves.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moravcsik, Edith
1975 Borrowed verbs.
Wiener Linguistische Gazette 8: 3–30.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moravcsik, Edith
1978 Universals of language contact. In
Universals of Human Language: Method and Theory, Vol. 1.
Joseph H. Greenberg,
Charles A. Ferguson &
Edith A. Moravcsik (eds), 93–122. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moravcsik, Edith
2003 Borrowed Verbs. Unpublished manuscript.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, Peter O., Ohnheiser, Ingeborg, Olsen, Susan & Rainer, Franz
(eds) 2015 Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, Scott
1984 Zero-derivation and inflection. In
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 7,
Margaret Speas &
Richard W. Sproat (eds), 53–69. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Namer, Fiammetta & Hathout, Nabil
2020 ParaDis and Démonette – From theory to resources for derivational paradigms.
The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 114: 5–33.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oxford English Dictionary Online (OED)
2021 OUP.
[URL] (4 August 2020).
Plag, Ingo
1999 Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plag, Ingo
2003 Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radimský, Jan
2020 A paradigmatic approach to compounding. In
Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation,
Jesús Fernández-Domínguez,
Alexandra Bagasheva &
Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 164–185. Leiden: Brill.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rainer, Franz
1988 Towards a theory of blocking: The case of Italian and German quality nouns. In
Yearbook of Morphology 1988,
Geert Booij &
Jaap van Marle (eds), 155–185. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rainer, Franz
2000 Produktivitätsbeschränkungen. In
Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Vol. 1,
Geert Booij,
Christian Lehmann &
Joachim Mugdan (eds), 877–885. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares
Santana-Lario, Juan & Valera, Salvador
(eds) 2017 Competing Patterns in English Affixation. Bern: Peter Lang.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2015 The scope of word-formation research. In
Word Formation. An International Handbook of Languages of Europe, Vol. 1,
Peter O. Müller,
Ingeborg Ohnheiser,
Susan Olsen &
Franz Rainer (eds), 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ševčíková, Magda
2021a Action nouns vs. nouns as bases for denominal verbs in Czech: A case study on directionality in derivation.
Word Structure 14: 97–128.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ševčíková, Magda
2021b Bezpříponová substantiva a vyjadřování vidového protikladu u příbuzných sloves.
Slovo a slovesnost 82: 263–288.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Štekauer, Pavol
1996 A Theory of Conversion in English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Štekauer, Pavol
2014 Derivational paradigms. In
The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology,
Rochelle Lieber &
Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Štekauer, Pavol, Valera, Salvador & Körtvélyessy, Lívia
2012 Word Formation in the World’s Languages. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Umbreit, Birgit
2010 Does love come from to love or to love from love? Why lexical motivation has to be regarded as bidirectional. In
Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation,
Alexander Onysko &
Sascha Michel (eds), 301–333. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valera, Salvador
2014 Conversion. In
The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology,
Rochelle Lieber &
Pavol Štekauer (eds), 154–168. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valera, Salvador
2015 Conversion. In
Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1,
Peter O. Müller,
Ingeborg Ohnheiser,
Susan Olsen &
Franz Rainer (eds), 322–339. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valera, Salvador
2020 Semantic patterns in noun-to-verb conversion in English. In
Complex Words,
Lívia Körtvélyessy &
Pavol Štekauer (eds), 311–314. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valera, Salvador & Ruz, Alba E.
2021 Conversion in English: Homonymy, polysemy and paronymy.
English Language and Linguistics 25(1): 181–204.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Veselovská, Ludmila
2001 K analýze českých deverbálních substantiv. In
Čeština – univerzália a specifika 3,
Zdeňka Hladká &
Petr Karlík (eds), 11–27. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warmbrunn, Jürgen
1994 Englische Lexikalische Entlehnungen im Wortschatz der Tschechischen Gegenwartssprache. Münster: LIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waszakowa, Krystina
2015 Foreign word-formation in Polish. In
Word Formation. An International Handbook of Languages of Europe, Vol. 3,
Peter O. Müller,
Ingeborg Ohnheiser,
Susan Olsen &
Franz Rainer (eds), 1679–1696. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wichmann, Søren & Wohlgemuth, Jan
2008 Loan verbs in a typological perspective. In
Aspects of Language Contact,
Thomas Stolz,
Dik Bakker &
Rosa Salas Palomo (eds), 89–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wohlgemuth, Jan
2009 A Typology of Verbal Borrowings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Hledíková, Hana & Magda Ševčíková
2024.
Conversion in languages with different morphological structures: a semantic comparison of English and Czech.
Morphology 34:1
► pp. 73 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.