Cover not available
Part of
On Spoken French: An Ashby Reader
William J. Ashby
[Studies in Language Companion Series 226] 2023
► pp. 113–128

Prefixed conjugation in Parisian French

 | University of California, Santa Barbara
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The status of the subject pronoun in Modern French
  • 3.The history of the subject pronoun and verb
  • 4.Trends reflected in the Paris Corpus
  • 5.Paralinguisic factors
    • 5.1Sex
    • 5.2Age
    • 5.3Profession
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Editor’s references
Published online: 2 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.226.c9
References (37)
References
Anderson, Shannon. 1975. On the syntax of liaison. French Review 48:845–55.Google Scholar
Ashby, William J. 1974. Il parle or iparl? Prefixed inflection in French. Semasia 1:83–93.Google Scholar
1975. Liaison, the rhythmic group, nouns and verbs of French. Studia linguistics 29: 110–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976. “The loss of the negative morpheme, ne, in Parisian French”. Lingua 39: 119–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977a. Clitic Inflection in French, an Historical Perspective, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1977b. Interrogative forms in Parisian French. Semasia 4:35–52.Google Scholar
Baldinger, Kurt. 1968. Post- und Prädetermnierung im Französichen. Festschrift … von Wartburg, ed by K. Baldinger, 1: 87–106. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bally, Charles. 1965. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. 4th ed. Berne Francke.Google Scholar
Feldman, David M. 1964. Analytic vs. synthetic A problem in the Portuguese verbal system. Linguistics 10: 16–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1960. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. IJAL. 26:178–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice. 1964. Le bon usage. Gembloux and Paris: J. Duculot.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A., Jr. 1948. Structural Sketch No. 1: French. Language monograph 24. Baltimore: LSA.Google Scholar
1964. Introductory Linguistics. Philadelphia: Chilton.Google Scholar
Heger, Klaus. 1966. La conjugaison objective en français et en espagnol. Languages 3:19–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Householder, Fred W. 1974. Review of Linguistic Change and Generative Theory, ed by R. P. Stockwell and R. K. S. Macaulay. Languages 50:555–68.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malécot, André. 1972. New Procedures for descriptive phonetics. Papers in linguistics and phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre, ed. by Albert Valdman. 344–55. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1974. Frequency of occurrence of French phonemes and consonant clusters. Phonetica 29: 158–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1975a. The glottal stop in French. Phonetica 31:51–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1975b. French liaison as a function of grammatical, phonetic and paralinguistic variables. Phonetica 32: 161–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malécot, André & Metz, Geri. 1973. Progressive nasal assimilation in French. Phonetica 26: 193–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malécot, André & Richman, Marie. 1973. Optional word-final consonants in French. Phonetica 26:65–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malécot, André, Johnston, R. & Kizziar, P.-A. 1973. Syllabic rate and utterance length in French. Phonetica 26: 46–48.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1964. Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indoeuropéennes. Reprint. University. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth I. 1967. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1963. Synthetic and analytic morphological constructs. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur kulturwissenschaft 9/10: 34–42.Google Scholar
. 1967. Trends and predictions. To Honor Roman Jakobson. 16:34–49. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Raymond, Gaston, ed. 1921. La Chastelaine de Vergi. Paris.Google Scholar
Rothe, Wolfgang. 1966. Romanische Objektkonjugation. Romanische Forschungen 78: 530–47.Google Scholar
Editor’s references
De Mulder, Walter & Lamiroy, Béatrice. 2012. Gradualness of grammaticalization in Romance. The position of French, Spanish and Italian. In Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections, Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 199–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth Beale. 2000. The Change from Pronoun to Clitic to Prefix and the Rise of Null Subjects in Spoken Swiss French. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie & Waugh, Linda R. 2003a. On the radical difference between the subject personal pronouns in written and spoken European French. In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 46], Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 225–240. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2003b. The subject clitics of Conversational European French: Morphologization, grammatical change, semantic change, and change in progress. In A Romance Perspective on Linguistic Knowledge and Use [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 238], Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis López & Richard Cameron (eds), 99–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamiroy, Béatrice & De Mulder, Walter. 2011. Degrees of grammaticalization across languages. In Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 302–318. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Aaron. 2000. Topic Management and Demonstrative in Spoken French and English: A Corpus-based Approach. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Sankoff, Gillian. 2019. Language change across the lifespan: Three trajectory types. Language 95(2): 197–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waugh, Linda R. & Monville-Burston, Monique. 2009. French. In The World’s Major Languages, 2nd edn, Bernard Comrie (ed.), 171–196. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar