Cover not available
Part of
Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective
Edited by Alessandra Barotto and Simone Mattiola
[Studies in Language Companion Series 227] 2023
► pp. 93–133

Chapter 5
From an adverb/postposition ‘behind’ to a discourse marker

The particle reχu in Andi

| Institute of Linguistic, Russian Academy of Sciences | HSE University (Moscow, Russia)

The paper describes two uses of the discourse particle reχu in Andi (Nakh-Daghestanian, Avar-Andic), namely the consecutive, or sequential, use found in the non-final clauses of multiclausal sentences and reinforcing the idea of temporal sequence (‘and then’), and the pragmatic use with retrospective contrastive meaning, predominantly found in imperatives and questions. A diachronic scenario is proposed for the development of the particle: first from spatial adverb/postposition ‘behind’ to temporal adverb/postposition ‘after’, then from clause-initial ‘then’ to clause-final sequential marker, then from longer to shorter sequential marker and, finally, from enclitic sequential marker to enclitic pragmatic particle. This evolution is accompanied by semantic, morphosyntactic and phonological changes typical of grammaticalization, and is supported by both intragenetic evidence and cross-linguistic parallels.

Keywords: discourse particle, adverb, postposition, consecutive, sequential, retrospective contrastive, grammaticalization, Nakh-Daghestanian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Andi language: Basic information
  • 3.Two uses of the particle reχu: Consecutive and discourse-pragmatic
    • 3.1reχu as a consecutive marker
    • 3.2reχu as a discourse-pragmatic marker
      • Questions
      • Imperatives
      • Exclamatives
      • Declaratives
    • 3.3Ambiguous cases: reχu in multiclausal imperatives and speech reports
  • 4.Looking for the grammaticalization source
    • 4.1reχudu as a final sequential connective
    • 4.2reχudu as a clause-initial sequential connective ‘then’
    • 4.3reχudu as a temporal postposition ‘after’
    • 4.4cl-eχudu as a spatial adverb/postposition ‘behind’
  • 5.Discussion: From an adverb/postposition to a particle
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 1 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.227.05mai
References

Sources

Tales
2010. – Magomedova, P. A. (ed) & M. A. Alisultanova (transl.), Dunjalla baxunnirssi xalɢilʟol ɢvanab mic’c’illassol muxal (World fairy tales in Andi). Makhachkala: ID Nurul’ iršad.Google Scholar
Luke
2015. – Lukašdi bosam rerhanoɬɬi xabar (The good news according to Luke). Moscow: Institut perevoda Biblii.Google Scholar
Agul Text Corpus
2004–2008. – A corpus of spontaneous oral texts in the Huppuq’ dialect of Agul, recorded during the Agul Documentation Project by Dmitry Ganenkov, Timur Maisak and Solmaz Merdanova.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2010 Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Alekseev, Mixail E.
1985 Voprosy sravnitel´no-istoričeskoj grammatiki lezginskix jazykov. Morfologija. Sintaksis (Problems of the comparative-historical reconstruction of the grammar of Lezgic languages: Morphology. Syntax). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
1988 Sravnitel’no-istoričeskaja morfologija avaro-andijskix jazykov (A comparative-historical grammar of Avar-Andic languages). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Alekseev, Mixail E., Ataev, Boris M., Magomedov, Magomed A., Magomedov, Magomed I., Madieva, Guldžaxan I., Saidova, Patimat A. & Samedov, Džalil S.
2012 Sovremennyj avarskij yazyk (Modern Avar). Makhachkala: DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Cercvadze, Ilia I.
1965 Andiuri ena: Gramat’ikuli analizi tek’st’ebit (Andi language: Grammatical analysis with texts). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Conathan, Lisa & Good, Jeff
2000 Morphosyntactic reduplication in Chechen and Ingush. In The Prooceedings from the Panels of the Chicago Linguistic Society’s Thirty-Six Meeting 36–2, Arika Okerent & John Boyle (eds), 49–61. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis, Dimmendaal, Gerrit J., Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & König, Christa
2008 Africa as a morphosyntactic area. In A Linguistic Geography of Africa, Bernd Heine & ‎Derek Nurse (eds), 86–150. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dirr, Adolf M.
1906 Kratkij grammatičeskij očerk andijskogo jazyka (Short grammatical sketch of Andi). Sbornik materialov dlja opisanija mestnostej i plemën Kavkaza 36. Section 4: 1–200.Google Scholar
Dobrushina, Nina, Koryakov, Yury & Daniel, Mikhail
2020 Atlas of multilingualism in Daghestan: A case study in diachronic sociolinguistics. Languages of the Caucasus 4: 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrushina, Nina, Staferova, Daria & Belokon, Alexander
(eds) 2017 Atlas of Multilingualism in Dagestan Online. Linguistic Convergence Laboratory, HSE. [URL] (16 April 2021).
Forker, Diana
2016 Toward a typology for additive markers. Lingua 180: 69–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2009 An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics 1(2): 293–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Mauri, Caterina
2011 The grammaticalization of final particles. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 656–667. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011 Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language and Communication 32(3): 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences 54: 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbs in the World’s Languages. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Kalinina, Elena
2011 Exclamative clauses in the languages of the North Caucasus and the problem of finiteness. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Finiteness in East-Caucasian Languages, Gilles Authier & Timur Maisak (eds), 161–201. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I.
2001 Deepričastnye konstrukcii (Converb constructions). In Bagvalinskij jazyk: Grammatika. Teksty. Slovari (Bagwalal: Grammar, texts, dictionaries), Aleksandr E. Kibrik, Konstantin I. Kazenin, Ekaterina A. Ljutikova & Sergej G. Tatevosov (eds), 554–594. Moscow: IMLI RAN.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E.
(ed) 1996 Godoberi. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha
2019 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1991 Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67(3): 475–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Apprehensional epistemics. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 293–327. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magomеdova, Patimat T.
1999 Čamalinsko-russkij slovar’ (Chamalal–Russian dictionary). Makhachkala: DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Magomedova, Patimat T.
2003 Tindinsko-russkij slovar’ (Tindi–Russian dictionary). Makhachkala: DNC RAN.Google Scholar
2012 Tindinskij jazyk (The Tindi language). Makhachkala: DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Maisak, Timur
2020 Vybor klitiki v zavisimosti ot vido-vremennoj formy predikata: Dannye andijskogo jazyka (The choice of a clitic can be driven by the tense-aspect form of the predicate: Evidence from Andi). Tipologiya Morfosintaksicheskikh Parametrov 3(1): 77–94.Google Scholar
2021 Endoclitics in Andi. Folia Linguistica 55(1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina
2008 Coordination Relations in the Languages of Europe and Beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A.
2008 The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed), 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd
2021 Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna & Peterson, David A.
2010 Contact-induced spread of the rare Type 5 clitic. LSA Archives, Vol 1: LSA Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts 2010 8: 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolayev, Sergei L. & Starostin, Sergei A.
1994 A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary. Moscow: Asterisk.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko
2011 The grammaticalization of discourse markers. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 614–624. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Panov, Vladimir
2020 The marking of uncontroversial information in Europe: Presenting the enimitive. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52(1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saidova, Patimat A.
2006 Godobеrinsko-russkij slovar’ (Godoberi–Russian dictionary). Makhachkala: DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Saidova, Patimat A. & Abusov, Magomed G.
2012 Botlixsko-russkij slovar’ (Botlikh–Russian dictionary). Makhachkala: DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Salimov, Xangerej S.
2010 Gagatlinskij govor andijskogo jazyka (The Gagatli dialect of the Andi language). Makhachkala: DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sulejmanov, Jakub G.
1957 Grammatičeskij očerk andijskogo jazyka (po dannym govora s. Rikvani) (Grammatical sketch of Andi: Based on the variant spoken in Rikvani). Moscow: Institut jazykoznanija AN SSSR dissertation.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Suzuki, Ryoko
2011 The grammaticalization of final particles. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 668–680. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(1): 26–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhees, Samira
2019 General converbs in Andi. Studies in Language 43(1): 195–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar