Cover not available
Part of
Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective
Edited by Alessandra Barotto and Simone Mattiola
[Studies in Language Companion Series 227] 2023
► pp. 295–336

Chapter 11
Highlighting beginning, end, or transition in-between

Topic-shift conceptions in English, Ainu, and Japanese

| Hokkaido University of Education
| Fuji Women’s University

This study presents a cross-linguistic analysis of episode- and topic-shift conceptions based on two types of spoken discourse (narrative and conversational) in English, Ainu, and Japanese. Markers of episode/topic-shift can serve to highlight different phases of episode/topic boundaries in conceptual terms: the end of a preceding episode/topic, the beginning of a newly introduced episode/topic, or a transitional phase between them. Ainu tends to manifest an end-oriented conception of both topic-shift in conversation and episode-shift in narrative. Japanese also exhibits a similar inclination in conversation, though not in narrative. English prefers a beginning-oriented conception of episode/topic-shift in both conversation and narrative with little inclination toward an end-oriented conception.

Keywords: topic-shift, episode-shift, phase, beginning, end, and transition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Minimal structure of topic/episode-shift or boundary
  • 3.Episode-shift in narrative discourse
    • 3.1Episode-shift in an Old English epic and narratives
    • 3.2Episode-shift in an Ainu epic and narratives
    • 3.3Episode-shift in a Japanese epic and narratives
    • 3.4Different preferences in episode-shift marker conceptions
  • 4.Topic-shift in conversational discourse
    • 4.1Topic-shift as a solution to topical-talk breakdown
    • 4.2Different phases of topic-shift conception in English
    • 4.3Topic-shift conception in Japanese
    • 4.4Topic-shift conception in Ainu
    • 4.5Different preferences in topic-shift conception
  • 5.Some conceptual correlations and motivations
    • 5.1Aspectual conception and topic/episode-shift
    • 5.2Speech-event conception and topic/episode-shift
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 1 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.227.11izu
References
Aijmer, Karin
2002 English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Michael
1995 Beowulf. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Joseph & Toller, Thomas Northcote
1898 An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian & Yule, George
1983 Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiri, Mashiho
1955 Ainu Bungaku (Ainu literature). Tokyo: Gengensha.Google Scholar
Das, Debopam
2014 Signalling of Coherence Relations in Discourse. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A.
2000 Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part One. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL] (24 July 2022).
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles, Thompson, Sandra A. & Martey, Nii
2003 Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Two Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL] (24 July 2022).
Du Bois, John W. & Englebretson, Robert
2004 Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Three. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL] (24 July 2022).
2005 Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Four. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL] (24 July 2022).
Enkvist, Nils Erik & Wårvik, Brita
1987 Old English þa, temporal chains, and narrative structure. In Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 48], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds), 221–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagard, Benjamin & Blumenthal, Peter
2020 Topic shift in contrast: Ways to change the subject in French and German. Journal of Pragmatics 156: 206–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2009 Topic orientation markers. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 892–898. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1984 Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol.1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1978 Response cries. Language 54: 787–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert K.
1992 Beowulf. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Hattori, Shiro
1964 Ainugo Hogen Jiten (An Ainu dialect dictionary with Ainu, Japanese, and English indexes). Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Hinds, John
1977 Paragraph structure and pronominalization. Papers in Linguistics 10: 77–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Institute of Language Teaching (ILT) (ed)
1984–1989 Ainugo Onsei Shiryo (Ainu language phonetic materials), Vols.1–6. Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
2021 Presentation followed by negotiation: Final pragmatic particle sequencing in Ainu. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325], Daniël Van Olmen & Jolanta Šinkūnienė (eds), 77–109, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
2011 Hokkaido hogen kopasu (Hokkaido dialect corpus). In Kopasu Bunseki ni motozuku Hokkaido Hogen no Danwa Goyoronteki Kenkyu (A corpus-based discourse-pragmatic study of the Hokkaido dialect of Japanese), Mitsuko Narita Izutsu (ed), 49–307. Sapporo: Fuji Women’s University.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Keizer, Evelien & Lohmann, Arne
2016 Extra-clausal constituents: An overview. In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karibe, Tsunenori & Koyama, Ryoichi
2007 The Old English Epic Beowulf: A Bilingual Edition. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Kayano, Shigeru
1996 Kayano Shigeru no Ainugo Jiten (Shigeru Kayano’s Ainu language dictionary). Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
1998 Kayano Shigeru no Ainu Shinwa Shusei, Vols. 1–10 (Shigeru Kayano’s compilation of Ainu myths, Vols 1–10). Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Kyosuke
1931 Ainu Jojishi Yukara no Kenkyu, nibunsatsu (A study of Ainu epic yukar, 2 Vols). Tokyo: Toyobunko.Google Scholar
1942 Yukara Gaisetsu: Ainu Jojishi (An overview of yukar: Ainu epic]. Tokyo: Seijisha.Google Scholar
Konishi, Tomoshichi & Minamide, Kosei
(eds) 2001 An Abridged Genius English-Japanese Dictionary, electronic version. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2002 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
2018 Ten Lectures on Cognitive Linguistics. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longacre, Robert E.
1979 The paragraph as a grammatical unit. In Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givón (ed), 115–134. New York, NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W.
1980 Placement of topic changes in conversation. Semiotics 30: 263–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Hiroshi
1995 Ainugo Chitose Hogen Jiten [The Ainu-Japanese Dictionary, Chitose Dialect (original English title)]. Tokyo: Sofukan.Google Scholar
1997 Ainu no Monogatari Sekai (Narrative worlds of Ainu). Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador & Arguedas, Maria Estellés
2009 Expressing digression linguistically: Do digressive markers exist? Journal of Pragmatics 41: 921–936. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1972 A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael J.
1979 The conduit metaphor – A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Metaphor and Thought, Andrew Ortony (ed), 284–324. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Richardson, Peter
1994 Imperfective aspect and episode structure in Beowulf. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 93: 313–325.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail
1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990 The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2003 Directional verbs in Japanese. In Motion, Direction, and Location in Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier [Typological Studies in Language, 56], Erin Shay & Uwe Seibert (eds), 259–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugimoto, Keizaburo
(ed) 2017 Shinpan Heikemonogatari Zenyakuchu (The story of Heike, totally translated and annotated, new edition), Vols. 1–4. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Tamura, Suzuko
1993 Ainugo Onsei Shiryo (Ainu language phonetic materials), Vol. 8. Tokyo: Institute of Language Teaching, Waseda University.Google Scholar
1996 Ainugo Saru Hogen Jiten (An Ainu-Japanese dictionary, the Saru dialect). Tokyo: Sofukan.Google Scholar
1997[1988] Ainugo (The Ainu language). In Gengogaku Daijiten Serekushon (An encyclopedia of linguistics: Selection), Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono & Eiichi Chino, 1–88. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Todd, Richard Watson
2016 Discourse Topics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 269]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2020 The development of “digressive” discourse-topic shift markers in English. Journal of Pragmatics 156: 121–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Liang-Fu
2011 The study of structure of first-time conversational topic changing: Based on data of the Japanese/Chinese society members. Intercultural Communication Studies 23: 1–19.Google Scholar
West, Candace & Garcia, Angela
1988 Conversational shift work: A study of topical transitions between women and men. Social Problems 35: 551–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar