Chapter in:
Reference: From conventions to pragmatics
Edited by Laure Gardelle, Laurence Vincent-Durroux and Hélène Vinckel-Roisin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 228] 2023
► pp. 269285
References
Asher, Nicholas
1993Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter
1981Zur indexikalitätsmarkierenden Funktion der demonstrativen Artikelform in deutschen Konversationen. In Sprache = Verstehen und Handeln, Götz Hindelang & Werner Zillig (eds), 301–310. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent & Strawson, Peter
2008On referring and not referring. In Reference: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Jeanette Gundel & Nancy Hedberg (eds), 13–58. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blühdorn, Hardarik
2009Referentielle und nicht-referentielle Gebrauchsweisen von Nominalgruppen im Deutschen. Akten der internationalen Linguistenkonferenz Karpacz 10.-12.09.2007 [Beihefte zum Orbis Linguarum 77], 25–41. Dresden: Neisse.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Marshall, Catherine
1981Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Elements of Discourse Understanding, Aravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber & Ivan Sag (eds), 10–63. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Sengul, Carol
1979In search of referents for nouns and pronouns. Memory & Cognition 7: 35–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert, Schreuder, Robert & Buttrik, Samuel
1983Common ground and the understanding of definite reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 245–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna
1986Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Consten, Manfred
2003Towards a unified model of domain-bound reference. In Deictic Conceptualisation of Space, Time and Person, [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 112]. Friedrich Lenz (ed.), 223–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Anaphorisch oder Deiktisch? Zu einem Integrativen Modell Domänengebundener Referenz. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Consten, Manfred & Averintseva-Klisch, Maria
2012Tentative reference acts? “Recognitional demonstratives” as means of suggesting mutual knowledge – or overriding a lack of it. Research in Language 10 ( 3 ): 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. [Typological Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donnellan, Keith
1966Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75 : 281–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978Speaker’s reference, description and anaphora. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol 9: Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 47–68. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. & Stivers, Tanya
2007Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A., Thompson, Sandra A., Ford, Cecilia & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2013Conversation analysis in linguistics. In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds), 726–740. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1892Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.Google Scholar
Gutfleisch-Rieck, Ingeborg, Klein, Wolfgang, Speck, Agnes & Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas
1989Transkriptionsvereinbarungen für den Sonderforschungsbereich 245 “Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext”. Reports des Sonderforschungsbereichs 245. Heidelberg: Universität Heidelberg. https://​www​.psychologie​.uni​-heidelberg​.de​/institutsberichte​/SFB245​/sfbberichte​.html (14 August 2022).
Haugh, Michael
2010Co-constructing what is said in interaction. In The Role of Data at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, Enikö Németh & Karóly Bibok (eds), 349–380. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John
1978Definiteness and Indefiniteness. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N.
1983Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Linsky, Leonard
1969Referring. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics (Vol. 1–2). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Molnár, Krisztina
2010Anamnestische Verwendung der Demonstrativa im Deutschen und im Ungarischen. Deutsche Sprache 4(10): 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pafel, Jürgen
2020Referenz [Kegli 22]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
2005A Survey of Dot Objects. Technical report, Brandeis University. https://​citeseerx​.ist​.psu​.edu​/viewdoc​/download​?doi​=10​.1​.1​.208​.7525​&rep​=rep1​&type​=pdf (14 August 2022).
Russell, Bertrand
1905On denoting. Mind 30: 479–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Anthony & Garrod, Simon
1981Understanding Written Language. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Monika
2000Indirekte Anaphern in Texten. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika & Consten, Manfred
2011Reference and anaphora. In Foundations of Pragmatics [Handbooks of Pragmatics 1], Wolfram Bublitz & Neal Norrick (eds), 347–372. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter
1950On referring. Mind 59: 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepek, Beatrice
2000Functional aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt) 21. http://​www​.inlist​.uni​-bayreuth​.de​/issues​/21​/inlist21​.pdf (14 August 2022)
van Dijk, Teun & Kintsch, Walter
1983Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Veldre-Gerner, Georgia
2007Demonstrativa im Text. Eine Vergleichende Untersuchung zum Französischen und Italienischen [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie] Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane
1997Einige Prinzipien des Textaufbaus. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar