Part of
Reconnecting Form and Meaning: In honour of Kristin Davidse
Edited by Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor and An Van linden
[Studies in Language Companion Series 230] 2023
► pp. 113
Bartlett, Tom
2016Phasal dynamism and the unfolding of meaning as text. English Text Construction 9(1): 143–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Tom & O’Grady, Gerard
2019Language characterology and textual dynamics. A crosslinguistic exploration in English and Scottish Gaelic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51(2): 124–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourgoin, Charlotte, O’Grady, Gerard & Davidse, Kristin
2021Managing information flow through prosody in it-clefts. English Language & Linguistics 25(3): 485–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte & Davidse, Kristin
2010Complex subordinators derived from noun complement clauses. Grammaticalization and paradigmaticity. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42(1): 101–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cecil H., Holman, Eric W. & Wichmann, Søren
2013Sound correspondences in the world’s languages. Language 89(1): 4–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra, Haddican, Bill, Richards, Hazel, Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Taylor, Ann
2013Asymmetrical trajectories. The past and present of -body/-one . Language Variation and Change 25: 287–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1991Categories of Experiential Grammar. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
1994Fact projection. In Perspectives on English. Studies in Honour of Professor Emma Vorlat, Keith Carlon, Kristin Davidse & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds), 257–284. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
1998Agnates, verb classes and the meaning of construals. The case of ditransitivity in English. Leuvense Bijdragen 87(3): 281–313.Google Scholar
1999aCategories of Experiential Grammar [Monographs in Systemic Linguistics]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
1999bAre there sentences that can be analyzed as there-clefts? In Thinking English Grammar. To Honour Xavier Dekeyser, Professor Emeritus, Guy Tops, Betty Devriendt & Steven Geukens (eds), 177–193. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2000A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 38(6): 1101–1131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
Davidse, Kristin
2004The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind. CSDL 2002, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 507–533. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2010On recognition criteria for modal auxiliaries resulting from grammaticalization. The case of modal auxiliaries deriving from nouns with verbal complements. Paper presented at ESSE, Torino, 24–28 August 2010.
2014On specificational there-clefts. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 1–34.Google Scholar
2018A tribute to M.A.K. Halliday (1925–2018). Functions of Language 25(2): 205–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Breban, Tine & Van linden, An
2008Deictification. The development of secondary deictic meanings by adjectives in the English NP. English Language and Linguistics 12(3): 475–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, De Wolf, Simon & Van linden, An
2015The development of the modal and discourse marker uses of (there/it is/I have) no doubt . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1): 25–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Kimps, Ditte
2016Specificational there-clefts. Functional structure and information structure. English Text Construction 9(1): 115–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Njende, Ngum M.
2019Enumerative there-clauses and there-clefts. Specification and information structure. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52(2): 160–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Rymen, Kathleen
Davidse, Kristin & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
2008Introduction. The realization of interpersonal meaning. Word 59(1): 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Van linden, An
2020Revisiting ‘it-extraposition’. The historical development of constructions with matrices (it)/(there) be + noun phrase followed by a complement clause. In Crossing Linguistic Boundaries: Systemic, Synchronic and Diachronic Variation in English, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo, María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya & Javier Pérez-Guerra (eds), 81–103. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Van linden, An & Brems, Lieselotte
2022A semiotic approach to grammaticalization. Modelling representational and interpersonal modality expressed by verbonominal patterns. Language Sciences 91: 101473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Van Praet, Wout & Njende, Ngum M.
(eds) 2019Communicative Dynamism. Special issue Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51(2).Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven
2011Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1): 236–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2010Grammar and interaction: New directions in constructional research. Constructions and Frames 2(2): 125–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline & Davidse, Kristin
2017Reconceptualizing factivity. A new view on the semantics of factive constructions. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 65–95.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Davidse, Kristin
2011The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives. Sources, paths and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 251–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1961Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17: 241–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqiaya
1987The grammarian’s dream. Lexis as most delicate grammar. In New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Vol. 1: Theory and Description, Michael A. K. Halliday & Robin Fawcett (eds), 184–211. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet
2003A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunter
2005 It-extraposition in English. A functional view. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(2): 119–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laffut, An
2006Three-participant Constructions in English. A Functional-cognitive Approach to Caused Relations [Studies in Language Companion Series 79]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laffut, An & Davidse, Kristin
Lambrecht, Knud
2001A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39: 463–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive Applications. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B.
2021Neo-Firthian Approaches to Linguistic Typology. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2020The Dynamics of the Linguistic System. Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An & Davidse, Kristin
2009The clausal complementation of deontic-evaluative adjectives in extraposition constructions. A synchronic-diachronic approach. Folia Linguistica 43(1): 171–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven & Davidse, Kristin
2009The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives. A constructional account. Cognitive Linguistics 20(4): 777–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven, Van Praet, Wout & Brems, Lieselotte
Van Rompaey, Tinne, Davidse, Kristin & Petré, Peter
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-subordinate Dichotomy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willemse, Peter, Davidse, Kristin & Heyvaert, Liesbet
2009English possessives as reference-point constructions and their function in the discourse. In The expression of Possession, William B. McGregor (ed.), 13–50. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar