Cover not available
Part of
Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses: Synchronic and Diachronic Insights
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Constanze Fleczoreck
[Studies in Language Companion Series 231] 2023
► pp. 250–266

Chapter 9
Three ReasonPs

A view from free adjuncts

 | Kanda University of International Studies
In this chapter, I will discuss three types of reason expressions in the framework of the cartography of syntactic structures. After reviewing the previous analyses of two ReasonPs that house reason expressions, it will be shown that there is still another ReasonP that houses reason expressions involving free adjuncts. I will further explore the possibility of splitting up the new type of ReasonP into the central type and the peripheral type by extending Haegeman’s (2012) idea of adverbial clauses.
Keywords: adverbial clause, free adjunct, cartography, ReasonP
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The cartography of syntactic structures
  • 3.Previous studies of ReasonPs
  • 4.ReasonP3: free adjuncts
  • 5.Implications
  • 6.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 1 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.231.09end
References (29)
References
Benicà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, focus, and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2 [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax], Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52–75. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language [Current Studies in Linguistics 36], Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio. 2007. Locality and Information Structure: A Cartographic Approach to Japanese [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Two ReasonPs. In Beyond Functional Sequence: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 10 [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax], Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 220–231. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Information structure, null case particle and sentence final discourse particle. In Information Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series 213], Pierre-Yves Modicom & Olivier Duplâtre (eds), 223–250. Amsterdam John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Non-standard questions in English, German and Japanese, in Linguistic Vanguard [Special issue on non-canonical questions from a comparative perspective], 251–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endo, Yoshio & Haegeman, Liliane. 2019. Adverbial clauses and adverbial Concord. In The Internal and External Syntax of Adverbial Clauses, Łukasz Jędrzejowski, Werner Frey & Andreas Pankau (eds). Special issue of Glossa 4(1): 48, 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena and the Composition of the Left Periphery [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax] Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Hill, Virginia. 2014. Vocatives and speech act projections: A case study in West Flemish. In On Peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, Anna Cardinaletti, Gugliemo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds), 209–236. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James & Ramchand, Gillian. 1997. The stage-level / individual-level distinction and the Mapping Hypothesis. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 2: 55–83.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language [Current Studies in Linguistics Series 3]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mihara, Kenichi. 2015. Nihongo-no Katuyoo Gensyoo (Japanese Conjugation Phenomena). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Agreements that occur mainly in the main clause. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Lilian Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 79–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noda, Hisasi. 1989. Bun koosee (Clause structures). In Nihongo to nihongo kyooiku (Japanese and Japanese Education), Yutaka Miyazi (ed.), 67–95. Tokyo: Meiji-syoin.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax (Studies in Generative Grammar 11). Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax [Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics 1], Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi [North-Holland Linguistic Series 59], Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 267–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3 [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax], Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–252. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement: Moving on [Current Studies in Linguistics 42], Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The cartography of syntactic structures: Locality and freezing effects on movement. In On Peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds), 29–60. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Ross, John. 1984. Inner islands. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Claudia Brugman & Monica Macaulay (eds), 258–265. Berkeley CA: BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur & Soare, Gabriela. 2011. Where’s ‘why’? Linguistic Inquiry 42(4): 651–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 1985. The Semantic Variability of Absolute Construction [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 25]. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko. 1992. Restructuring and event argument in Japanese. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America, Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, 9–12 January.
. 1993. Adjuncts and event argument in Restructuring. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 3, Soonja Choi (ed.), 121–136. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 255–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar