Cover not available
Part of
Different Slants on Grammaticalization
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Vittorio Tantucci
[Studies in Language Companion Series 232] 2023
► pp. 50–73

Chapter 2
From fear to reason

Grammaticalization as dependency vs expansion of the Mandarin apprehensive 怕 pà

| Lancaster University
| University of Liverpool

In this study we support the view that grammaticalization can unfold both in the form of increased dependency and increased expansion (cf. Traugott & Trousdale 2013), even when originating from the same original lexeme. We provide the case study of the Mandarin apprehensive verb 怕 pà ‘to be afraid’ which developed a new epistemic meaning ‘to believe, to conclude that’. The shift from fear to reason in so-called epistemic-apprehensives (Jing-Schmidt & Kapatsinski 2012) has been observed in a number of languages, including the English construction I am afraid (Leech 1983; Palmer 2001). What this study shows is that this transition in Chinese involves grammaticalization as increased dependency for constructions such as 不怕 bùpà ‘no fear’ > ‘although’ and 只怕 zhǐpà ‘only fear’ > ‘probably’. However, it also leads to grammaticalization as expansion, such is the case of 恐怕 kǒngpà ‘to be afraid’ > ‘to conclude that’. This supports and reinforces Traugott & Trousdale’s (2013) view that grammaticalization is not necessarily bound to increased reduction and dependency and can be at work also as a mechanism of functional expansion, even along the same cline of change, such is the present one involving the same source (fear) and target domains (reason) of reanalysis.

Keywords: grammaticalization, apprehensives, Chinese, epistemic, evidentiality, expansion
Article outline
  • 1.From fear to reason cross-linguistically
    • 1.2Grammaticalization as dependency vs expansion
    • 1.3Affectives in Mandarin: 恐怕 kǒngpà
    • 1.4Apprehensives in Mandarin: 只怕 zhǐpà and 不怕 bùpà
  • 2.Data retrieval
  • 3.Analysis
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.232.02tan
References
Austin, Peter
1981 A Grammar of Diyari, South Australia [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 32]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1971[1958] Subjectivity in language. In Problems in General Linguistics, 223–230. Trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny
2020 Expressives in argumentation: The case of apprehensive straks (‘shortly’) in Dutch. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild. A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory, Frans H. van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds), 185–204. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Thompson, Sandra A.
2000 Concessive patterns in conversation. In Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds), 381–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dictionary of Classical Chinese
(2002) 古代汉语词典 Gudai Hanyu Cidian (Dictionary of Classical Chinese). Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1977 A Grammar of Yidin [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 19]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul
1984 Expression and the nature of emotion. In Approaches to Emotion, Klaus R. Scherer & Paul Ekman (eds), 319–344. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1994 Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin 115(2): 268–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine
1999 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3): 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1982 The Future in Thought and Language. Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gao, Zeng Xia
(2003) 汉语担心一认识情态词 “怕” “看” “别” 的语法化 Hanyu danxin “pa” “kan” “bie” de yufahua [The grammaticalization of the Chinese epistemic-apprehensives “pa”, “kan” “bie”]. The Journal of the University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences 1: 97–112.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001 Syntax: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995 A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1980 Hua: A Papuan Language of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea [Studies in Language Companion Series 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2): 180–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2018 Are there two ways of approaching grammaticalization? In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 202], Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José Vicente Lozano (eds), 23–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization: A Look from its Components and its Fringes, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol.1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zuo & Kapatsinski, Vsevolod
2012 The apprehensive: Fear as endophoric evidence and its pragmatics in English, Mandarin, and Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 44(4): 346–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
2005 Concessive clauses. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Keith Brown (ed.), 820–824. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Sandford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1994 Predicates: Aspectual types. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ronald E. Asher & James M. Y. Simpson, 3297–3302. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
1995 Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2004 Theory and method in grammaticalization. In Grammatikalisierung. Gabriele Diewald (ed.). Special issue of Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32: 152–187.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1991 Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67(3): 475–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frank
1995 Apprehensional epistemics. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 293–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Xiaoying
2011 词义的历时演变与对外汉语词汇教学 – 以“恐怕”为例 Ciyi de lishi yanbian yu duiwai hanyu cihui jiaoxue (The diachronic evolution of lexical meaning and TCFL vocabulary teaching – Take ‘Kongpa’ as an example). Journal of Hebei University (Philosophy and Social Science) 3: 61–64.Google Scholar
Mathiassen, Terje
1996 A Short Grammar of Lithuanian. Bloomington OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Mitkovska, Liljana, Bužarovska, Eleni & Ivanova, Elena
2017 Apprehensive-epistemic da-constructions in Balkan Slavic. Slověne = Словѣне. International Journal of Slavic Studies 6(2), 57–83.Google Scholar
Modern Chinese Dictionary
2016 现代汉语词典 Xiandai hanyu cidian (Modern Chinese Dictionary). Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Niculescu, Dana
2013 Romanian passive participles as complements of perception verbs. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique LVIII(1): 55–71.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
1978 Expressive illocutionary acts. Journal of Pragmatics 2(3): 277–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ōta, Tatsuo
2003 中国语历史文法 Zhongguoyu lishi wenfa (Survey of the Historical Syntax of Chinese). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
2001 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1992 The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fundraising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], Sandra A. Thompson & William Mann (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
1995 Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1976 A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheng, Lichun
2008 “大概”、“也许” 和 “恐怕” 的语义、语用分析 Dagai yexu he kongpa de yuyi yuyong fenxi [Semantic and pragmatic analysis of modal adverbs “dagai”, “yexu” and “kongpa”]. Chinese Language Learning 1: 45–51.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH
1996 The search for units of meaning. Textus 9: 75–106.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2012 Evidentiality in interaction: The concessive use of the Italian future between grammar and discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 44(15): 2116–2128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio
2013 Interpersonal evidentiality: The Mandarin V-过 guo construction and other evidential systems beyond the ‘source of information’. Journal of pragmatics 57: 210–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a Epistemic inclination and factualization: A synchronic and diachronic study on the semantic gradience of factuality. Language and Cognition 7(3): 371–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, V.
(2015b) Traversativity and grammaticalization: The aktionsart of 过 guo as a lexical source of evidentiality. Chinese Language and Discourse, 6(1), 57–100.Google Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio
2016a Toward a typology of constative speech acts: Actions beyond evidentiality, epistemic modality, and factuality. Journal Intercultural Pragmatics 13(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b Textual factualization: The phenomenology of assertive reformulation and presupposition during a speech event. Journal of Pragmatics 101: 155–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017a From immediate to extended intersubjectification: A gradient approach to intersubjective awareness and semasiological change. Language and Cognition 9(1): 88–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b An evolutionary approach to semasiological change: Overt influence attempts through the development of the Mandarin 吧-ba particle. Journal of Pragmatics 120: 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 Language and Social Minds: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Intersubjectivity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, V., & Di Cristofaro, M.
(2020) Entrenchment inhibition: Constructional change and repetitive behaviour can be in competition with large-scale “recompositional” creativity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 547–579.Google Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio & Di Cristofaro, Matteo
2021 Pre-emptive interaction in language change and ontogeny: The case of [there is no NP]. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17(3): 715–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio & Wang, Aiqing
2018 Illocutional concurrences: The case of evaluative speech acts and face-work in spoken Mandarin and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 138: 60–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020a Diachronic change of rapport orientation and sentence-periphery in Mandarin. Discourse Studies 22(2): 146–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020b From co-actions to intersubjectivity throughout Chinese ontogeny: A usage-based analysis of knowledge ascription and expected agreement. Journal of Pragmatics 167: 98–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 175: 94–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022a Resonance as an applied predictor of cross-cultural interaction: Constructional priming in Mandarin and American English interaction. Applied Linguistics 43(1): 115–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022b Dialogic priming and dynamic resonance in Autism: Creativity competing with engagement in Chinese children with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022c Dynamic resonance and explicit dialogic engagement in Mandarin first language acquisition. Discourse Processes 59(7): 553–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(1): 26–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik
1951 Deontic logic. Mind 60(237): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1999 Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xinhua Dictionary
2004 新华字典 Xinhua Zidian (Xinhua Dictionary). Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Bei
2016 汉语认识情态表达 “可能” “也许” “大概 ” “恐怕” 用法对比分析 Hanyu renshi qingtai biaoda keneng yexu dagai kongpa duibi fenxi (A corpus-based analysis of Chinese epistemic modals: Constrast among ‘Kěnéng’, ‘Yěxǔ’, ‘Dàgài’ and ‘Kǒngpà’). Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies 27(6): 33–41.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Chor, Winnie & Wang, Jiao
2012 On the development of epistemic ‘fear’ markers: An analysis of Mandar in kongpa and Cantonese taipaa. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 312–342. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar