Cover not available
Part of
Different Slants on Grammaticalization
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Vittorio Tantucci
[Studies in Language Companion Series 232] 2023
► pp. 263–281

Chapter 10
An emerging final particle

The case of quoi ‘what’ in French

| University of Rouen,
Turn-taking is one of the contexts leading to innovative language use. In this article, I will explore the relationship between the emergence of grammatical patterns and intersubjectivity. Final particles belong to the category of linguistic expressions that generate the production of interactional grammar. After reviewing the various meanings of final quoi in French dictionaries, I will test the five principles of grammaticalization, namely layering, divergence, specialization, persistence and decategorization and I will try to show that the evolution of the particle cannot be restricted to the grammaticalization process.
Keywords: final particle, quoi, intersubjectivity, grammaticalization, cooptation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data
  • 3.quoi in dictionaries
  • 4.Hopper’s (1991) five principles of grammaticalization
    • 4.1Principle 1: Layering
    • 4.2Principle 2: Divergence
    • 4.3Principle 3: Specialization
    • 4.4Principle 4: Persistence
    • 4.5Principle 5: Decategorization
  • 5.Grammaticalization of the particle and beyond
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Dictionaries
  • Corpus
Published online: 13 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.232.10han
References (30)
References
Andrews, Barry. 1989. Terminating devices in spoken French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 27(3): 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2002. Gender, Politeness and Pragmatic Particles in French [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 104]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Pragmatic particles – Polite but powerless? Tone-group terminal hein and quoi in contemporary spoken French. Multilingua 23: 61–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich. 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language [Studies in Pragmatics 12]. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chanet, Catherine. 2001. 1700 occurrences de la particule quoi en français parlé contemporain: Approche de la ‘distribution’ et des fonctions en discours. Marges Linguistiques 2: 56–80.Google Scholar
Delierre, Charles. 1997. Tu fais attention à c’que tu dis, quoi ou première approche de quoi. Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique de Strasbourg 27 : 25–61.Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Waltereit, Richard. 2011. Turn-taking as a trigger for language-change. In Rahmen des Sprechens. Beiträge zu Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kreolistik, Kognitiver und Historischer Semantik, Sarah Dessì Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Richard Waltereit (eds), 175–189. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. & Giora, Rachel. 2014. From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25 (3), 351–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goose, André. 1993. Le Bon Usage, 13th edn. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphan approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th Birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Nawada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of discourse grammar. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 155–206. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol.1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2005. Le discours en interaction. Paris: Armand ColinGoogle Scholar
Lefeuvre, Florence. 2006. Quoi de neuf sur quoi? Étude morphosyntaxique du mot quoi. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar
Lefeuvre, Florence, Morel, Mary-Annick & Teston-Bonnard, Sandra 2011. Valeurs prototypiques de quoi à travers ses usages en français oral. Bulletin de la Société Néophilologique (Neuphilologische Mitteilungen) 112(1): 37–59.Google Scholar
Morel, Mary-Annick & Danon-Boileau, Laurent. 1998. Grammaire de l’intonation. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy, Auchlin, Antoine, Moeschler, Jacques & Rubatte, Christian. 1985. L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds), 624–643. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Grammaticalization. In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 269–283. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2012. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction 5: 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity on Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Discourse, Syntax and Cognition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dictionaries
Furetière, Antoine 1690. Dictionnaire universel.Google Scholar
Le Grand Robert de la langue française 2013.Google Scholar
Le Petit Robert 1967. paris: Société du Nouveau Littré, le Robert.Google Scholar
Littré, Emile 1876. Dictionnaire de la langue française. Société du Littré.Google Scholar
Larousse, Pierre 1889. Dictionnaire complet. Paris: LarousseGoogle Scholar
Trésor de la langue française informatisé, (TLFi). 1990Google Scholar
Corpus
Corpus de français parlé parisien (CFPP)
French Web corpus 2017Google Scholar