Cover not available
Part of
Granularity in the Verbalization of Events and Objects: A cross-linguistic study
Katerina Stathi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 233] 2023
► pp. 447–460

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2009 ‘Eating’, ‘drinking’ and ‘smoking’: A generic verb and its semantics in Manambu. In Newman (ed.), 91–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K.
2007 The coding of topological relations in verbs: The case of Likpe (Sεkpεlé). Linguistics 45(5–6): 1065–1103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Essegbey, James
2007 Cut and break verbs in Ewe and the causative alternation construction. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 241–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Levinson, Stephen C.
2007 Introduction: The typology and semantics of locative predicates: Posturals, positionals, and other beasts. Linguistics 45(5–6): 847–871. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K., de Witte, Carlien & Wilkins, David
1999 Picture series for positional verbs: Eliciting the verbal component in locative descriptions. In Manual for the 1999 Field Season, David Wilkins (ed.), 48–54. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Andersen, Elaine S.
1978 Lexical universals of body-part terminology. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. III: Word Structure, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds), 335–368. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Andics, Attila
2012 The semantic role of agentive control in Hungarian placement events. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 183–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arad, Maya
2007 Some aspects of the Hebrew verb saxah ‘swim’. In Glagoly dviženija v vode: Leksičeskaja tipologija (Verbs of aqua-motion: Lexical typology), Timur Maisak & Ekaterina V. Rakhilina (eds), 498–508. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Anthony E.
1981 Japanese verbs of dress. Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bağrıaçık, Metin & Ralli, Angela
2015 Phrasal vs. morphological compounds: Insights from Modern Greek and Turkish. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 68(3): 323–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batoréo, Hanna J.
2008 Cognitive and lexical characteristics of motion in liquid medium: Aqua-motion verbs in typologically different languages. Psychology of Language and Communication 12(2): 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1998 When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? English Language and Linguistics 2(1): 65–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2012 Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 331–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas
2006 The internal structure of four-noun compounds in English and German. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2): 197–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Anglistische Sprachwissenschaft. München: Wilhelm Fink. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Boundary permeability: A parameter for linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology 18(3): 489–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Compounding in German and English: A quantitative translation study. Languages in Contrast 17(1): 43–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas, Helmer, Sabine, Neubauer, Marion & Lohmann, Arne
2012 Determinants of the extent of compound use: A contrastive analysis. Linguistics 50(2): 269–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent
1967 Categories of eating in Tzeltal and Navaho. International Journal of American Linguistics 33(1): 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Kay, Paul
1969 Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berthele, Raphael
2012 On the use of PUT Verbs by multilingual speakers of Romansh. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 145–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2014 Overt and hidden complexity – Two types of complexity and their implications. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50(2): 127–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Hidden complexity – The neglected side of complexity and its implications. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1): 177–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blank, Andreas
2001 Pathways of lexicalization. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, 2. Halbband [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20], Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1596–1608. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen
2007 Morpholexical transparency and the argument structure of verbs of cutting and breaking. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 153–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Bowerman, Melissa & Brown, Penelope
2001 Cut and break clips. In Manual for the field season 2001, Stephen C. Levinson & Nicholas J. Enfield (eds), 90–96. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Brown, Penelope
2007 Standing divided: Dispositionals and locative predications in two Mayan languages. Linguistics 45(5–6): 1105–1151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Enfield, Nicholas J., Essegbey, James, Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, Kita, Sotaro, Lüpke, Friederike & Ameka, Felix K.
2007 Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3): 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa
2005 Why can’t you “open” a nut or “break” a cooked noodle? Learning covert object categories in action word meanings. In Building Object Categories in Developmental Time: 32nd Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition, Lisa Gershkoff-Stowe & David H. Rakison (eds), 209–243. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa & Choi, Sonja
2003 Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds), 387–427. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa & Pederson, Eric
1992 Topological relations picture series. In Space Stimuli Kit 1.2, Stephen C. Levinson (ed.). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cecil H.
1976 General principles of human anatomical partonomy and speculations on the growth of partonomic nomenclature 1. American Ethnologist 3(3): 400–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope
1994 The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: The semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics 32: 743–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 ‘She had just cut/broken off her head’: Cutting and breaking verbs in Tzeltal. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 319–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language. In Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability, Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds), 167–189. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2012 To ‘put’ or to ‘take’? Verb semantics in Tzeltal placement and removal expressions. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 55–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas
2012 The linguistic encoding of placement and removal events in Jahai. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 21–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas & Majid, Asifa
2011 Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. Senses & Society 6(1): 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burger, Harald
2015 Phraseologie: Eine Einführung am Beispiel des Deutschen, 5. Auflage. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2010 The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Complex Predicates: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds), 48–78. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1985 Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Beckner, Clay
2009 Usage-based theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 827–855. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chen, Jidong
2007 ‘He cut-break the rope’: Encoding and categorizing cutting and breaking events in Mandarin. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 273–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2000 Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1973 Einführung in die stukturelle Betrachtung des Wortschatzes, 2. Auflage. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A.
1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy
2010 Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages. New York NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar & Lemmens, Maarten
2007 Lexical conflation patterns in Dutch aquamotion verbs. In Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija (Verbs of aqua-motion: Lexical typology), Timur Maisak & Ekaterina V. Rakhilina (eds), 152–174. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Dornseiff, Franz
2004 Der deutsche Wortschatz nach Sachgruppen, 8., völlig neu bearbeitete Auflage. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duggirala, Vasanta & Naidu, Y. Viswanatha
2012 Cutting and breaking events in Telugu. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 6(12): 3460–3467.Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Margetts, Anna, Meira, Sérgio & Terrill, Angela
2007 Four languages from the lower end of the typology of locative predication. Linguistics 45(5–6): 873–892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J.
2007 Lao separation verbs and the logic of linguistic event categorization. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 287–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J., Majid, Asifa & van Staden, Miriam
2006 Cross-linguistic categorisation of the body: Introduction. Language Sciences 28: 137–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Essegbey, James
2007 Cut and break verbs in Sranan. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 231–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2000 Kinship verbs. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, Petra Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds), 103–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Semantic typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae J. Song (ed.), 504–533. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah M. B.
1991 The semantics of the positional predicates liegen/legen, sitzen/setzen, and stehen/stellen. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 42(2): 136–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
2012 Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 33: 29–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane
1990 English verbs as a semantic net. International Journal of Lexicography 3(4): 278–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 The organization of verbs and verb concepts in a semantic net. In Predicative Forms in Natural Language and in Lexical Knowledge Bases, Patrick Saint-Dizier (ed.), 93–109. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 On the semantics of troponymy. In The Semantics of Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Rebecca Green, Carol A. Bean & Sung H. Myaeng (eds), 23–34. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud & Fenk, August
2008 Complexity trade-offs between the subsystems of language. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki & Karlsson (eds), 43–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1970 The grammar of Hitting and Breaking. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 120–133. Waltham MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Flecken, Monique, Weimar, Katja, Carroll, Mary & von Stutterheim, Christiane
2015 Driving along the road or heading for the village? Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French-German L2 users. The Modern Language Journal 99(Supplement): 100–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang & Barz, Irmhild
2012 Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 4. Auflage. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaby, Alice
2007 Describing cutting and breaking events in Kuuk Thaayorre. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 263–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 The Thaayorre lexicon of putting and taking. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 233–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker, König, Ekkehard & Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2014 Comparative lexicology and the typology of event descriptions: A programmatic study. In Meaning and Grammar of Nouns and Verbs, Doris Gerland, Christian Horn, Anja Latrouite & Albert Ortmann (eds), 145–183. Düsseldorf: dup.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Grondelaers, Stefan & Bakema, Peter
1994 The Structure of Lexical Variation: Meaning, Naming, and Context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre
1978 On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development 69: 988–998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory 4(2): 161–178.Google Scholar
1982 Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Language Development, Vol. 2: Language, Thought and Culture, Stan A. Kuczaj (ed.), 301–334. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre & Boroditsky, Lera
2001 Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, Melissa Bowerman & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 215–256. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gipper, Helmut
1959 Sessel oder Stuhl? Ein Beitrag zur Bestimmung von Wortinhalten im Bereich der Sachkultur. In Sprache: Schlüssel zur Welt: Festschrift für Leo Weisgerber, Helmut Gipper (ed.), 271–292. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Google Scholar
Givón, Thomas
1984 Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gliozzo, Alfio & Strapparava, Carlo
2009 Semantic Domains in Computational Linguistics. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Göksel, Aslı
2009 Compounds in Turkish. Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 213–236.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goschler, Juliana
2013 Motion events in Turkish-German contact varieties. In Goschler & Stefanowitsch (eds), 115–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goschler, Juliana & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
(eds) 2013 Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing 41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P.
1975 Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette
2006 The expression of static location in a typological perspective. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories [Typological Studies in Language 66], Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds), 29–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S.
1965 Studies in Lexical Relations. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Guirardello-Damian, Raquel
2007 Locative construction and positionals in Trumai. Linguistics 45(5–6): 917–953. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, Marianne & Burenhult, Niclas
2012 Probing the linguistic encoding of placement and removal events in Swedish. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 167–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, Marianne & Narasimhan, Bhuvana
2010 What gestures reveal about how semantic distinctions develop in Dutch children’s placement verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 21(2): 239–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1980 The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56(3): 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–25 [Typological Studies in Language 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harm, Volker
2015 Einführung in die Lexikologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heegård Petersen, Jan
2012 How to put and take in Kalasha. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 349–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, Maya, Engemann, Helen, Soroli, Efstathia, Hendriks, Henriëtte & Vincent, Coralie
2017 Expressing and categorizing motion in French and English: Verbal and non-verbal cognition across languages. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 61–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene
1997 Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1985 The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verbs’. In Haiman (ed.), 151–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Judith
2013a Caused-motion verbs in the Middle English intransitive motion construction. In Goschler & Stefanowitsch (eds), 203–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Motion and the English Verb: A Diachronic Study. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
2017a Motion and the English Verb: A Diachronic Study. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b The early life of borrowed path verbs in English. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 177–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, Janellen & Lui, Felicia
1979 The semantic organization of some simple nouns and verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 141–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
2012 Placement and removal events in Basque and Spanish. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Motion and semantic typology: A hot old topic with exciting caveats. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 13–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2017 Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and Applications [Human Cognitive Processing 59]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempton, Willett
1975 Category grading and taxonomic relation: A mug is a sort of cup. American Ethnologist 5: 44–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A.
2012 Toward a typology of verbal lexical systems: A case study in Northern Athabaskan. Linguistics 50(3): 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter
2001 Lexical typology from a cognitive and linguistic point of view. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, 2. Halbband. [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20], Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1142–1178. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker
2009 Understanding English-German Contrasts, 2. neu bearbeitete Auflage. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
König, Wolf D.
1987 Nominalkomposita im Türkischen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 6(2): 165–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta
2012 Semantic granularity of placement and removal expressions in Polish. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 327–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Narasimhan, Bhuvana
2012 Events of Putting and Taking: A Crosslinguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 100]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2008 Approaching lexical typology. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed.), 3–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 New directions in lexical typology. Linguistics 50: 373–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Semantic typology. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 453–472. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Divjak, Dagmar & Rakhilina, Ekaterina V.
2010 Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A case study in lexical typology. In New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion [Studies in Language Companion Series 115], Victoria Hasko & Renee Perelmutter (eds), 315–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. & Vanhove, Martine
2016 The semantics of lexical typology. In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, Nicholas Riemer (ed.), 434–454. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Vanhove, Martine & Koch, Peter
2007 Typological approaches to lexical semantics. Linguistic Typology 11: 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania A.
1999 On ‘sit’/’stand’/’lie’ auxiliation. Linguistics 37(2): 191–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutscher, Silvia & Genç, Nuran Sevim
2007 Laz positional verbs: Semantics and use with inanimate figures. Linguistics 45(5): 1029–1064. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1973 The boundaries of words and their meanings. In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds), 340–373. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Landau, Barbara
2005 Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Barbara & Lakusta, Laura
2006 Spatial language and spatial representation: Autonomy and interaction. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories [Typological Studies in Language 66], Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds), 309–333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lander, Yury, Maisak, Timur & Rakhilina, Ekaterina V.
2013 Verbs of aquamotion: Semantic domains and lexical systems. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 67–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lane, George S.
1931 Words for clothing in the principal Indo-European languages. Language 7(3): 3–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Nouns and verbs. Language 63(1): 53–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne
1974 Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1992 A theory of vocabulary structure: Retrospectives and prospectives. In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution, Martin Pütz (ed.), 243–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leisi, Ernst
1971 Der Wortinhalt: Seine Struktur im Deutschen und Englischen. 4. durchgesehene und erweiterte Auflage. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
1973 Praxis der englischen Semantik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Lemmens, Maarten
2002 The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs. In Newman (ed.), 103–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1991 Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41: 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates, Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds), 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicatures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Cut and break verbs in Yéli Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 207–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Preface. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), xi–xv.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & Brown, Penelope
2012 Put and Take in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 273–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levisen, Carsten
2015 Scandinavian semantics and the human body: An ethnolinguistic study in diversity and change. Language Sciences 49: 51–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard
1980 Methodology and representation in the study of lexical fields. In Perspektiven der lexikalischen Semantik: Beiträge zum Wuppertaler Semantikkolloquium vom 2.-3. Dezember 1977, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 93–114. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Lüpke, Friederike
2007 ‘Smash it again, Sam’: Verbs of cutting and breaking in Jalonke. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 251–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lutzeier, Peter R.
1982 The notion of lexical field and its application to English nouns of financial income. Lingua 56: 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 Die semantische Struktur des Lexikons. In Handbuch der Lexikologie, Christoph Schwarze & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 103–133. Königstein: Athenäum.Google Scholar
1992 Wortfeldtheorie und Kognitive Linguistik. Deutsche Sprache 20: 62–81.Google Scholar
1995 Lexikalische Felder – Was sie waren, was sie sind und was sie sein könnten. In Die Ordnung der Wörter: Kognitive und lexikalische Strukturen [Institut für Deutsche Sprache Jahrbuch 1993], Gisela Harras (ed.), 4–29. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007 Lexikologie: Ein Arbeitsbuch, unveränd. Nachdr. d. 1. Aufl. 1995. 2. Auflage. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1968 Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Maisak, Timur & Rakhilina, Ekaterina V.
2007 Glagoly dviženija v vode: Leksičeskaja tipologija (Verbs of aqua-motion: Lexical typology). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa
2010 Words for parts of the body. In Words and the Mind: How Words Capture Human Experience, Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds), 58–71. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 A guide to stimulus-based elicitation for semantic categories. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork, Nicholas Thieberger (ed.), 54–71. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2015 Comparing lexicons cross-linguistically. In The Oxford Handbook of the Word, John R. Taylor (ed.), 364–379. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Boster, James S. & Bowerman, Melissa
2008 The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking. Cognition 109: 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Bowerman, Melissa, van Staden, Miriam & Boster, James S.
2007a The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa & Burenhult, Niclas
2014 Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition 130: 266–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Enfield, Nicholas J. & van Staden, Miriam
2006 Parts of the body: Cross-linguistic categorisation. Language Sciences 28(2–3): 137–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Gullberg, Marianne, van Staden, Miriam & Bowerman, Melissa
2007b How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 179–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Jordan, Fiona M. & Dunn, Michael
2015 Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language Sciences 49: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa & van Staden, Miriam
2015 Can nomenclature for the body be explained by embodiment theories? Topics in Cognitive Science 7: 570–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Ameel, Eef, Imai, Mutsumi, Gennari, Silvia P., Saji, Noburo & Majid, Asifa
2014 Human locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 74: 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Gennari, Silvia P. & Imai, Mutsumi
2010 Lexicalization patterns and the world-to-words mapping. In Words and the Mind: How Words Capture Human Experience, Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds), 29–57. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Gennari, Silvia P., Imai, Mutsumi, Ameel, Eef, Tsuda, Naoaki & Majid, Asifa
2008 Talking about walking: Biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science 19(3): 232–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C. & Majid, Asifa
2013 How thought is mapped onto words. WIREs Cognitive Science 4: 583–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Sloman, Steven A. & Gennari, Silvia P.
2003 Universality and language specificity in object naming. Journal of Memory and Language 49: 20–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Sloman, Steven A., Gennari, Silvia P., Shi, Meiyi & Wang, Yuan
1999 Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language 40: 230–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauldin, Margaret & Martin, Jack
1994 Verbs of wearing in Creek (Muskogee). MALC 2: 588–597.Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer
1969 Frog, Where Are You? New York NY: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio
2006 Tiriyó body part terms. Language Sciences 28: 262–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius & Karlsson, Fred
2008 Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2009 How transitive are EAT and DRINK verbs? In Newman (ed.), 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Cutting and breaking in Äiwoo: Event integration and the complexity of lexical expressions. Cognitive Linguistics 23(2): 395–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, William & Gentner, Dedre
1990 Semantic constraints on lexical categories. Language and Cognitive Processes 5(3): 169–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana
2007 Cutting, breaking, and tearing verbs in Hindi and Tamil. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 195–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Putting and Taking in Tamil and Hindi. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 201–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana, Kopecka, Anetta, Bowerman, Melissa, Gullberg, Marianne & Majid, Asifa
2012 Putting and taking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying [Typological Studies in Language 51]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 A cross-linguistic overview of ‘eat’ and ‘drink’. In Newman (ed.), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2009 The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking Drinking [Typological Studies in Language 84]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John & Aberra, Daniel
2009 Amharic EAT and DRINK verbs. In Newman (ed.), 253–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2013 Lexical splits in the encoding of motion events from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Goschler & Stefanowitsch (eds), 185–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nouaouri, Nadi
2012 The semantics of placement and removal predicates in Moroccan Arabic. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 99–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Loretta
2007 ‘Chop, shred, snap apart’: Verbs of cutting and breaking in Lowland Chontal. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 219–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Susan
1996 Partikelverben im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In Deutsch – typologisch: Jahrbuch 1995 des Instituts für deutsche Sprache, Ewald Lang & Gisela Zifonun (eds), 261–288. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, Şeyda & Slobin, Dan I.
2000a Climb up vs. ascend climbing: Lexicalization choices in expressing motion events with manner and path components. In BUCLD 24: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, S. C. Howell, Sarah A. Fish & Thea Keith-Lucas (eds), 558–570. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2000b Manner of movement in monolingual and bilingual adult narratives: Turkish vs. English. In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Lincoln College, Oxford; August 12–14, 1998, Aslı Göksel & Celia Kerslake (eds), 253–272. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2003 Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics; August 16–18, 2000, Ayşe S. Özsoy, Didar Akar, Mine Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, Eser E. Erguvanlı-Taylan & Ayhan Aksu-Koç (eds), 259–269. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Özcelik, Sümeyya
2014 Deutsche und türkische Verben im Vergleich: Das Wortfeld der Nahrungs- und Flüssigkeitszunahme. Bachelor-Arbeit, Leibniz Universität Hannover.Google Scholar
Özyürek, Aslı
2000 Differences in spatial conceptualization in Turkish and English discourse: Evidence from both speech and gesture. In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Lincoln College, Oxford; August 12–14, 1998, Aslı Göksel & Celia Kerslake (eds), 263–272. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L.
2007 Cutting and breaking verbs in Otomi: An example of lexical specification. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 307–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna, Massey, Christine & Gleitman, Lila
2002 Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84: 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition 98: B75–B87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna & Selimis, Stathis
2010 Lexical and structural biases in the acquisition of motion verbs. Language Learning and Development 6: 87–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew
1987 Encoding events in Kalam and English: Different logics for reporting experience. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), 329–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Eric, Danziger, Eve, Wilkins, David, Levinson, Stephen C., Kita, Sotaro & Senft, Gunter
1998 Sematic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74(3): 557–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkuhn, Rainer, Keibel, Holger & Kupietz, Marc
2012 Korpuslinguistik. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piirainen, Elisabeth
2012 Widespread Idioms in Europe and Beyond: Toward a Lexicon of Common Figurative Units. New York NY: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo
2003 Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans
1984 Verbs and objects in semantic agreement: Minor differences between English and German that might suggest a major one. Journal of Semantics 3: 305–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pye, Clifton
1996 K’iche’ Maya verbs of breaking and cutting. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 87–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ralli, Angela
1992 Compounds in Modern Greek. Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 143–174.Google Scholar
2008 Compound markers and parametric variation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 61(1): 19–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Compounding in Modern Greek. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2013 Compounding and its locus of realization: Evidence from Greek and Turkish. Word Structure 6(2): 181–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ralli, Angela & Stavrou, Melita
1998 Morphology-syntax interface: A-N compounds vs. A-N constructs in Modern Greek. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–264. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapold, Christian J.
2012 The encoding of placement and removal events in ǂĀkhoe Haiǁom. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 79–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2010 Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 21–38. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Zheng, Mingyu
2007 Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally
2002 Posture and existence predicates in Dene Sųɬiné (Chipewyan). In Newman (ed.), 61–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Athapaskan eating and drinking verbs and constructions. In Newman (ed.), 109–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, Robert H.
1952 Noun and verb in universal grammar. Language 28(3): 289–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roget, Peter M.
2004 Roget’s Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases, new edn, revised and edited by George Davidson. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1978 Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds), 27–48. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B., Gray, Wayne D., Johnson, David M. & Boyes-Braem, Penny
1976 Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8: 382–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Ellsworth, Michael, Petruck, Miriam R. L., Johnson, Christopher R., Baker, Collin F. & Scheffczyk, Jan
2016 FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. [URL] (4 February 2023).
Schaefer, Ronald P.
1985 Toward universal semantic categories for human body space. Linguistics 23: 391–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaller, Helmut W.
1975 Die Balkansprachen: Eine Einführung in die Balkanphilologie. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
2000 On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 715–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlücker, Barbara
2012 Die deutsche Kompositionsfreudigkeit: Übersicht und Einführung. In Das Deutsche als kompositionsfreudige Sprache: Strukturelle Eigenschaften und systembezogene Aspekte, Livio Gaeta & Barbara Schlücker (eds), 1–25. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2000 Simple and Complex Verbs in Jaminjung: A Study of Event Categorisation in an Australian Language. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank, Mitschke, Sara, von Bibra, Franziska, Wienholz, Anne, Grauli, Mirjam… et al.
2013 The semantic domain of dressing and undressing cross-linguistically. Talk given at the Association for Linguistic Typology 10th Biennial Conference (ALT 10), 15–18 August 2013, University of Leipzig.
Simpson, Edward H.
1949 Measurement of diversity. Nature 163(4148): 688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
1987 Thinking for Speaking. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, John Aske (ed.), 435–445. Berkeley CA: BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics 1(1): 7–25.Google Scholar
1996 From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1997 Mind, code, and text. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón, Joan L. Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Evidence for Linguistic Relativity [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 198] Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds), 107–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds), 157–191. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004 How people move: Discourse effects of linguistic typology. In Discourse Across Languages and Cultures [Studies in Language Companion Series 68], Carol Lynn Moder & Aida Martinovic-Zic (eds), 195–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, Kopecka, Anetta & Majid, Asifa
2014 Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics 25(4): 701–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary
1983 Verb-descriptivity in German and English: A Contrastive Study. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Soroli, Efstathia
2011 Typology and spatial cognition in English, French and Greek: Evidence from eye-tracking. In Proceedings of the Fourth ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, ExLing 2011: 25–27 May 2011, Paris, France, Antonis Botinis (ed.), 127–130. Athens: University of Athens.Google Scholar
van Staden, Miriam
2007 ‘Please open the fish’: Verbs of separation in Tidore, a Papuan language of Eastern Indonesia. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 297–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Staden, Miriam & Narasimhan, Bhuvana
2013 Granularity in the cross-linguistic encoding of motion and location. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 134–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane & Nüse, Ralf
2003 Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics 41(5): 851–881. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 15–18, 1991: General Session and Parasession on the Grammar of Event Structure, Laurel A. Sutton, Christopher R. Johnson & Ruth Shields (eds), 480–519. Berkeley CA: BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2016 Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics 2(2): 133–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Past, present, and future of motion research. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R.
2007 Semantic categories of cutting and breaking: Some final thoughts. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 331–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teo, Amos
2007 Breaking up is Hard to do: Teasing Apart Morphological Complexity in Iwaidja and Maung. Bachelor Thesis, University of Melbourne.
Toups, Melissa A., Kitchen, Andrew, Light, Jessica E. & Reed, David L.
2011 Origin of clothing lice indicates early clothing use by anatomically modern humans in Africa. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(1): 29–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trier, Jost
1934 Das sprachliche Feld: Eine Auseinandersetzung. In Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung, Ernst Wilmanns & Eduard Schön (eds), 428–449. Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar
Tutton, Mark
2013 Granularity, space, and motion-framed location. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 149–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkerk, Annemarie
2013 Scramble, scurry and dash: The correlation between motion event encoding and manner verb lexicon size in Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change 3: 169–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Diachronic change in Indo-European motion event encoding. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4(1): 40–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Åke
2006 Towards a lexical profile of the Swedish verb lexicon. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59(1): 103–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vostantzoglou = Βοσταντζόγλου, Θεολόγος
2008 Αντιλεξικόν ή Ονομαστικόν της Νεοελληνικής Γλώσσης. 3. edn. Αθήνα: Νήμα.Google Scholar
Vulchanova, Mila & van der Zee, Emile
(eds) 2013 Motion Encoding in Language and Space. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vulchanova, Mila, Martinez, Liliana & Vulchanov, Valentin
2013 Distinctions in the linguistic encoding of motion: Evidence from a free naming task. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 11–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Laurel J.
1976 Position in grammar: Sit, stand, lie. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 16–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wehrle, Hugo & Eggers, Hans
1967 Deutscher Wortschatz: Ein Wegweiser zum treffenden Ausdruck, 13. Auflage. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1982 Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat? Language 58(4): 753–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 Cups and mugs: Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Australian Journal of Linguistics 4(2): 205–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 What’s in a noun? (Or: How do nouns differ in meaning from adjectives?). Studies in Language 10(2): 353–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wnuk, Ewelina
2016a Semantic Specificity of Perception vVrbs in Maniq. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
2016b Specificity at the basic level in event taxonomies: The case of Maniq verbs of ingestion. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2016), Anna Papafragou, Daniel Grodner, Daniel Mirman & John Trueswell (eds), 2687–2692. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Yükseler, Hitay
1987 Turkish nominal compounds. In Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 7, Peter Avery & Hitay Yükseler (eds), 83–102. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Zacks, Jeffrey M. & Tversky, Barbara
2001 Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin 127(1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Granularity in taxonony, time, and space. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 123–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar