Cover not available
Part of
Granularity in the Verbalization of Events and Objects: A cross-linguistic study
Katerina Stathi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 233] 2023
► pp. 447–460

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2009. ‘Eating’, ‘drinking’ and ‘smoking’: A generic verb and its semantics in Manambu. In Newman (ed.), 91–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. 2007. The coding of topological relations in verbs: The case of Likpe (Sεkpεlé). Linguistics 45(5–6): 1065–1103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Essegbey, James. 2007. Cut and break verbs in Ewe and the causative alternation construction. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 241–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Levinson, Stephen C. 2007. Introduction: The typology and semantics of locative predicates: Posturals, positionals, and other beasts. Linguistics 45(5–6): 847–871. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K., de Witte, Carlien & Wilkins, David. 1999. Picture series for positional verbs: Eliciting the verbal component in locative descriptions. In Manual for the 1999 Field Season, David Wilkins (ed.), 48–54. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Andersen, Elaine S. 1978. Lexical universals of body-part terminology. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. III: Word Structure, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds), 335–368. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Andics, Attila. 2012. The semantic role of agentive control in Hungarian placement events. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 183–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arad, Maya. 2007. Some aspects of the Hebrew verb saxah ‘swim’. In Glagoly dviženija v vode: Leksičeskaja tipologija (Verbs of aqua-motion: Lexical typology), Timur Maisak & Ekaterina V. Rakhilina (eds), 498–508. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Anthony E. 1981. Japanese verbs of dress. Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bağrıaçık, Metin & Ralli, Angela. 2015. Phrasal vs. morphological compounds: Insights from Modern Greek and Turkish. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 68(3): 323–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batoréo, Hanna J. 2008. Cognitive and lexical characteristics of motion in liquid medium: Aqua-motion verbs in typologically different languages. Psychology of Language and Communication 12(2): 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1998. When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? English Language and Linguistics 2(1): 65–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2012. Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 331–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas. 2006. The internal structure of four-noun compounds in English and German. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2): 197–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Anglistische Sprachwissenschaft. München: Wilhelm Fink. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Boundary permeability: A parameter for linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology 18(3): 489–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Compounding in German and English: A quantitative translation study. Languages in Contrast 17(1): 43–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas, Helmer, Sabine, Neubauer, Marion & Lohmann, Arne. 2012. Determinants of the extent of compound use: A contrastive analysis. Linguistics 50(2): 269–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent. 1967. Categories of eating in Tzeltal and Navaho. International Journal of American Linguistics 33(1): 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Kay, Paul. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berthele, Raphael. 2012. On the use of PUT Verbs by multilingual speakers of Romansh. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 145–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2014. Overt and hidden complexity – Two types of complexity and their implications. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50(2): 127–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Hidden complexity – The neglected side of complexity and its implications. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1): 177–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blank, Andreas. 2001. Pathways of lexicalization. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, 2. Halbband [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20], Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1596–1608. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2007. Morpholexical transparency and the argument structure of verbs of cutting and breaking. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 153–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Bowerman, Melissa & Brown, Penelope. 2001. Cut and break clips. In Manual for the field season 2001, Stephen C. Levinson & Nicholas J. Enfield (eds), 90–96. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Brown, Penelope. 2007. Standing divided: Dispositionals and locative predications in two Mayan languages. Linguistics 45(5–6): 1105–1151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Enfield, Nicholas J., Essegbey, James, Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, Kita, Sotaro, Lüpke, Friederike & Ameka, Felix K. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3): 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa. 2005. Why can’t you “open” a nut or “break” a cooked noodle? Learning covert object categories in action word meanings. In Building Object Categories in Developmental Time: 32nd Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition, Lisa Gershkoff-Stowe & David H. Rakison (eds), 209–243. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa & Choi, Sonja. 2003. Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds), 387–427. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa & Pederson, Eric. 1992. Topological relations picture series. In Space Stimuli Kit 1.2, Stephen C. Levinson (ed.). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cecil H. 1976. General principles of human anatomical partonomy and speculations on the growth of partonomic nomenclature 1. American Ethnologist 3(3): 400–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope. 1994. The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: The semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics 32: 743–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. ‘She had just cut/broken off her head’: Cutting and breaking verbs in Tzeltal. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 319–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language. In Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability, Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds), 167–189. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2012. To ‘put’ or to ‘take’? Verb semantics in Tzeltal placement and removal expressions. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 55–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas. 2012. The linguistic encoding of placement and removal events in Jahai. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 21–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas & Majid, Asifa. 2011. Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. Senses & Society 6(1): 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burger, Harald. 2015. Phraseologie: Eine Einführung am Beispiel des Deutschen, 5. Auflage. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2010. The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Complex Predicates: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds), 48–78. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Beckner, Clay. 2009. Usage-based theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 827–855. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chen, Jidong. 2007. ‘He cut-break the rope’: Encoding and categorizing cutting and breaking events in Mandarin. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 273–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1973. Einführung in die stukturelle Betrachtung des Wortschatzes, 2. Auflage. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy. 2010. Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages. New York NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar & Lemmens, Maarten. 2007. Lexical conflation patterns in Dutch aquamotion verbs. In Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija (Verbs of aqua-motion: Lexical typology), Timur Maisak & Ekaterina V. Rakhilina (eds), 152–174. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Dornseiff, Franz. 2004. Der deutsche Wortschatz nach Sachgruppen, 8., völlig neu bearbeitete Auflage. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duggirala, Vasanta & Naidu, Y. Viswanatha. 2012. Cutting and breaking events in Telugu. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 6(12): 3460–3467.Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Margetts, Anna, Meira, Sérgio & Terrill, Angela. 2007. Four languages from the lower end of the typology of locative predication. Linguistics 45(5–6): 873–892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. 2007. Lao separation verbs and the logic of linguistic event categorization. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 287–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J., Majid, Asifa & van Staden, Miriam. 2006. Cross-linguistic categorisation of the body: Introduction. Language Sciences 28: 137–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Essegbey, James. 2007. Cut and break verbs in Sranan. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 231–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2000. Kinship verbs. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, Petra Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds), 103–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Semantic typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae J. Song (ed.), 504–533. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah M. B. 1991. The semantics of the positional predicates liegen/legen, sitzen/setzen, and stehen/stellen. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 42(2): 136–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 2012. Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 33: 29–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane. 1990. English verbs as a semantic net. International Journal of Lexicography 3(4): 278–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. The organization of verbs and verb concepts in a semantic net. In Predicative Forms in Natural Language and in Lexical Knowledge Bases, Patrick Saint-Dizier (ed.), 93–109. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. On the semantics of troponymy. In The Semantics of Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Rebecca Green, Carol A. Bean & Sung H. Myaeng (eds), 23–34. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud & Fenk, August. 2008. Complexity trade-offs between the subsystems of language. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki & Karlsson (eds), 43–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1970. The grammar of Hitting and Breaking. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 120–133. Waltham MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Flecken, Monique, Weimar, Katja, Carroll, Mary & von Stutterheim, Christiane. 2015. Driving along the road or heading for the village? Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French-German L2 users. The Modern Language Journal 99(Supplement): 100–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang & Barz, Irmhild. 2012. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 4. Auflage. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaby, Alice. 2007. Describing cutting and breaking events in Kuuk Thaayorre. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 263–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The Thaayorre lexicon of putting and taking. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 233–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker, König, Ekkehard & Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 2014. Comparative lexicology and the typology of event descriptions: A programmatic study. In Meaning and Grammar of Nouns and Verbs, Doris Gerland, Christian Horn, Anja Latrouite & Albert Ortmann (eds), 145–183. Düsseldorf: dup.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Grondelaers, Stefan & Bakema, Peter. 1994. The Structure of Lexical Variation: Meaning, Naming, and Context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre. 1978. On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development 69: 988–998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981. Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory 4(2): 161–178.Google Scholar
. 1982. Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Language Development, Vol. 2: Language, Thought and Culture, Stan A. Kuczaj (ed.), 301–334. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre & Boroditsky, Lera. 2001. Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, Melissa Bowerman & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 215–256. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gipper, Helmut. 1959. Sessel oder Stuhl? Ein Beitrag zur Bestimmung von Wortinhalten im Bereich der Sachkultur. In Sprache: Schlüssel zur Welt: Festschrift für Leo Weisgerber, Helmut Gipper (ed.), 271–292. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Google Scholar
Givón, Thomas. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gliozzo, Alfio & Strapparava, Carlo. 2009. Semantic Domains in Computational Linguistics. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Göksel, Aslı. 2009. Compounds in Turkish. Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 213–236.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goschler, Juliana. 2013. Motion events in Turkish-German contact varieties. In Goschler & Stefanowitsch (eds), 115–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goschler, Juliana & Stefanowitsch, Anatol (eds). 2013. Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing 41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 2006. The expression of static location in a typological perspective. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories [Typological Studies in Language 66], Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds), 29–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S. 1965. Studies in Lexical Relations. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Guirardello-Damian, Raquel. 2007. Locative construction and positionals in Trumai. Linguistics 45(5–6): 917–953. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, Marianne & Burenhult, Niclas. 2012. Probing the linguistic encoding of placement and removal events in Swedish. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 167–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, Marianne & Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2010. What gestures reveal about how semantic distinctions develop in Dutch children’s placement verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 21(2): 239–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56(3): 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985. Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–25 [Typological Studies in Language 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harm, Volker. 2015. Einführung in die Lexikologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heegård Petersen, Jan. 2012. How to put and take in Kalasha. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 349–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, Maya, Engemann, Helen, Soroli, Efstathia, Hendriks, Henriëtte & Vincent, Coralie. 2017. Expressing and categorizing motion in French and English: Verbal and non-verbal cognition across languages. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 61–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1997. Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verbs’. In Haiman (ed.), 151–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Judith. 2013a. Caused-motion verbs in the Middle English intransitive motion construction. In Goschler & Stefanowitsch (eds), 203–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Motion and the English Verb: A Diachronic Study. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
. 2017a. Motion and the English Verb: A Diachronic Study. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. The early life of borrowed path verbs in English. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 177–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, Janellen & Lui, Felicia. 1979. The semantic organization of some simple nouns and verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 141–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2012. Placement and removal events in Basque and Spanish. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Motion and semantic typology: A hot old topic with exciting caveats. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 13–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2017. Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and Applications [Human Cognitive Processing 59]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempton, Willett. 1975. Category grading and taxonomic relation: A mug is a sort of cup. American Ethnologist 5: 44–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. 2012. Toward a typology of verbal lexical systems: A case study in Northern Athabaskan. Linguistics 50(3): 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter. 2001. Lexical typology from a cognitive and linguistic point of view. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, 2. Halbband. [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20], Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1142–1178. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker. 2009. Understanding English-German Contrasts, 2. neu bearbeitete Auflage. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
König, Wolf D. 1987. Nominalkomposita im Türkischen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 6(2): 165–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta. 2012. Semantic granularity of placement and removal expressions in Polish. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 327–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2012. Events of Putting and Taking: A Crosslinguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 100]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2008. Approaching lexical typology. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed.), 3–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. New directions in lexical typology. Linguistics 50: 373–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Semantic typology. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 453–472. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Divjak, Dagmar & Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. 2010. Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A case study in lexical typology. In New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion [Studies in Language Companion Series 115], Victoria Hasko & Renee Perelmutter (eds), 315–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. & Vanhove, Martine. 2016. The semantics of lexical typology. In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, Nicholas Riemer (ed.), 434–454. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Vanhove, Martine & Koch, Peter. 2007. Typological approaches to lexical semantics. Linguistic Typology 11: 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania A. 1999. On ‘sit’/’stand’/’lie’ auxiliation. Linguistics 37(2): 191–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutscher, Silvia & Genç, Nuran Sevim. 2007. Laz positional verbs: Semantics and use with inanimate figures. Linguistics 45(5): 1029–1064. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds), 340–373. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Landau, Barbara. 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Barbara & Lakusta, Laura. 2006. Spatial language and spatial representation: Autonomy and interaction. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories [Typological Studies in Language 66], Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds), 309–333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lander, Yury, Maisak, Timur & Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. 2013. Verbs of aquamotion: Semantic domains and lexical systems. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 67–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lane, George S. 1931. Words for clothing in the principal Indo-European languages. Language 7(3): 3–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Nouns and verbs. Language 63(1): 53–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1974. Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
. 1992. A theory of vocabulary structure: Retrospectives and prospectives. In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution, Martin Pütz (ed.), 243–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leisi, Ernst. 1971. Der Wortinhalt: Seine Struktur im Deutschen und Englischen. 4. durchgesehene und erweiterte Auflage. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
. 1973. Praxis der englischen Semantik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Lemmens, Maarten. 2002. The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs. In Newman (ed.), 103–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1991. Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41: 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates, Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds), 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicatures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Cut and break verbs in Yéli Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 207–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Preface. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), xi–xv.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & Brown, Penelope. 2012. Put and Take in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 273–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levisen, Carsten. 2015. Scandinavian semantics and the human body: An ethnolinguistic study in diversity and change. Language Sciences 49: 51–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard. 1980. Methodology and representation in the study of lexical fields. In Perspektiven der lexikalischen Semantik: Beiträge zum Wuppertaler Semantikkolloquium vom 2.-3. Dezember 1977, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 93–114. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Lüpke, Friederike. 2007. ‘Smash it again, Sam’: Verbs of cutting and breaking in Jalonke. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 251–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lutzeier, Peter R. 1982. The notion of lexical field and its application to English nouns of financial income. Lingua 56: 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985. Die semantische Struktur des Lexikons. In Handbuch der Lexikologie, Christoph Schwarze & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 103–133. Königstein: Athenäum.Google Scholar
1992. Wortfeldtheorie und Kognitive Linguistik. Deutsche Sprache 20: 62–81.Google Scholar
1995. Lexikalische Felder – Was sie waren, was sie sind und was sie sein könnten. In Die Ordnung der Wörter: Kognitive und lexikalische Strukturen [Institut für Deutsche Sprache Jahrbuch 1993], Gisela Harras (ed.), 4–29. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007. Lexikologie: Ein Arbeitsbuch, unveränd. Nachdr. d. 1. Aufl. 1995. 2. Auflage. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Maisak, Timur & Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. 2007. Glagoly dviženija v vode: Leksičeskaja tipologija (Verbs of aqua-motion: Lexical typology). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa. 2010. Words for parts of the body. In Words and the Mind: How Words Capture Human Experience, Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds), 58–71. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. A guide to stimulus-based elicitation for semantic categories. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork, Nicholas Thieberger (ed.), 54–71. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2015. Comparing lexicons cross-linguistically. In The Oxford Handbook of the Word, John R. Taylor (ed.), 364–379. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Boster, James S. & Bowerman, Melissa. 2008. The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking. Cognition 109: 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Bowerman, Melissa, van Staden, Miriam & Boster, James S. 2007a. The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa & Burenhult, Niclas. 2014. Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition 130: 266–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Enfield, Nicholas J. & van Staden, Miriam. 2006. Parts of the body: Cross-linguistic categorisation. Language Sciences 28(2–3): 137–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Gullberg, Marianne, van Staden, Miriam & Bowerman, Melissa. 2007b. How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 179–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Jordan, Fiona M. & Dunn, Michael. 2015. Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language Sciences 49: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa & van Staden, Miriam. 2015. Can nomenclature for the body be explained by embodiment theories? Topics in Cognitive Science 7: 570–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Ameel, Eef, Imai, Mutsumi, Gennari, Silvia P., Saji, Noburo & Majid, Asifa. 2014. Human locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 74: 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Gennari, Silvia P. & Imai, Mutsumi. 2010. Lexicalization patterns and the world-to-words mapping. In Words and the Mind: How Words Capture Human Experience, Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds), 29–57. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Gennari, Silvia P., Imai, Mutsumi, Ameel, Eef, Tsuda, Naoaki & Majid, Asifa. 2008. Talking about walking: Biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science 19(3): 232–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C. & Majid, Asifa. 2013. How thought is mapped onto words. WIREs Cognitive Science 4: 583–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Sloman, Steven A. & Gennari, Silvia P. 2003. Universality and language specificity in object naming. Journal of Memory and Language 49: 20–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Sloman, Steven A., Gennari, Silvia P., Shi, Meiyi & Wang, Yuan. 1999. Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language 40: 230–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauldin, Margaret & Martin, Jack. 1994. Verbs of wearing in Creek (Muskogee). MALC 2: 588–597.Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York NY: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio. 2006. Tiriyó body part terms. Language Sciences 28: 262–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius & Karlsson, Fred. 2008. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2009. How transitive are EAT and DRINK verbs? In Newman (ed.), 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Cutting and breaking in Äiwoo: Event integration and the complexity of lexical expressions. Cognitive Linguistics 23(2): 395–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, William & Gentner, Dedre. 1990. Semantic constraints on lexical categories. Language and Cognitive Processes 5(3): 169–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2007. Cutting, breaking, and tearing verbs in Hindi and Tamil. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 195–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Putting and Taking in Tamil and Hindi. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 201–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana, Kopecka, Anetta, Bowerman, Melissa, Gullberg, Marianne & Majid, Asifa. 2012. Putting and taking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying [Typological Studies in Language 51]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. A cross-linguistic overview of ‘eat’ and ‘drink’. In Newman (ed.), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2009. The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking Drinking [Typological Studies in Language 84]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John & Aberra, Daniel. 2009. Amharic EAT and DRINK verbs. In Newman (ed.), 253–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2013. Lexical splits in the encoding of motion events from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Goschler & Stefanowitsch (eds), 185–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nouaouri, Nadi. 2012. The semantics of placement and removal predicates in Moroccan Arabic. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 99–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Loretta. 2007. ‘Chop, shred, snap apart’: Verbs of cutting and breaking in Lowland Chontal. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 219–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Susan. 1996. Partikelverben im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In Deutsch – typologisch: Jahrbuch 1995 des Instituts für deutsche Sprache, Ewald Lang & Gisela Zifonun (eds), 261–288. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, Şeyda & Slobin, Dan I. 2000a. Climb up vs. ascend climbing: Lexicalization choices in expressing motion events with manner and path components. In BUCLD 24: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, S. C. Howell, Sarah A. Fish & Thea Keith-Lucas (eds), 558–570. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2000b. Manner of movement in monolingual and bilingual adult narratives: Turkish vs. English. In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Lincoln College, Oxford; August 12–14, 1998, Aslı Göksel & Celia Kerslake (eds), 253–272. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics; August 16–18, 2000, Ayşe S. Özsoy, Didar Akar, Mine Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, Eser E. Erguvanlı-Taylan & Ayhan Aksu-Koç (eds), 259–269. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Özcelik, Sümeyya. 2014. Deutsche und türkische Verben im Vergleich: Das Wortfeld der Nahrungs- und Flüssigkeitszunahme. Bachelor-Arbeit, Leibniz Universität Hannover.Google Scholar
Özyürek, Aslı. 2000. Differences in spatial conceptualization in Turkish and English discourse: Evidence from both speech and gesture. In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Lincoln College, Oxford; August 12–14, 1998, Aslı Göksel & Celia Kerslake (eds), 263–272. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2007. Cutting and breaking verbs in Otomi: An example of lexical specification. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 307–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna, Massey, Christine & Gleitman, Lila. 2002. Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84: 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition 98: B75–B87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna & Selimis, Stathis. 2010. Lexical and structural biases in the acquisition of motion verbs. Language Learning and Development 6: 87–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 1987. Encoding events in Kalam and English: Different logics for reporting experience. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), 329–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Eric, Danziger, Eve, Wilkins, David, Levinson, Stephen C., Kita, Sotaro & Senft, Gunter. 1998. Sematic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74(3): 557–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkuhn, Rainer, Keibel, Holger & Kupietz, Marc. 2012. Korpuslinguistik. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piirainen, Elisabeth. 2012. Widespread Idioms in Europe and Beyond: Toward a Lexicon of Common Figurative Units. New York NY: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1984. Verbs and objects in semantic agreement: Minor differences between English and German that might suggest a major one. Journal of Semantics 3: 305–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pye, Clifton. 1996. K’iche’ Maya verbs of breaking and cutting. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 87–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ralli, Angela. 1992. Compounds in Modern Greek. Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 143–174.Google Scholar
. 2008. Compound markers and parametric variation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 61(1): 19–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Compounding in Modern Greek. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
. 2013. Compounding and its locus of realization: Evidence from Greek and Turkish. Word Structure 6(2): 181–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ralli, Angela & Stavrou, Melita. 1998. Morphology-syntax interface: A-N compounds vs. A-N constructs in Modern Greek. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–264. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapold, Christian J. 2012. The encoding of placement and removal events in ǂĀkhoe Haiǁom. In Kopecka & Narasimhan (eds), 79–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 21–38. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Zheng, Mingyu. 2007. Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally. 2002. Posture and existence predicates in Dene Sųɬiné (Chipewyan). In Newman (ed.), 61–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Athapaskan eating and drinking verbs and constructions. In Newman (ed.), 109–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, Robert H. 1952. Noun and verb in universal grammar. Language 28(3): 289–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roget, Peter M. 2004. Roget’s Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases, new edn, revised and edited by George Davidson. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds), 27–48. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B., Gray, Wayne D., Johnson, David M. & Boyes-Braem, Penny. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8: 382–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Ellsworth, Michael, Petruck, Miriam R. L., Johnson, Christopher R., Baker, Collin F. & Scheffczyk, Jan. 2016. FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. <[URL]> (4 February 2023).
Schaefer, Ronald P. 1985. Toward universal semantic categories for human body space. Linguistics 23: 391–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaller, Helmut W. 1975. Die Balkansprachen: Eine Einführung in die Balkanphilologie. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2000. On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 715–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlücker, Barbara. 2012. Die deutsche Kompositionsfreudigkeit: Übersicht und Einführung. In Das Deutsche als kompositionsfreudige Sprache: Strukturelle Eigenschaften und systembezogene Aspekte, Livio Gaeta & Barbara Schlücker (eds), 1–25. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2000. Simple and Complex Verbs in Jaminjung: A Study of Event Categorisation in an Australian Language. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank, Mitschke, Sara, von Bibra, Franziska, Wienholz, Anne, Grauli, Mirjam… et al. 2013. The semantic domain of dressing and undressing cross-linguistically. Talk given at the Association for Linguistic Typology 10th Biennial Conference (ALT 10), 15–18 August 2013, University of Leipzig.
Simpson, Edward H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163(4148): 688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1987. Thinking for Speaking. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, John Aske (ed.), 435–445. Berkeley CA: BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics 1(1): 7–25.Google Scholar
1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1997. Mind, code, and text. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón, Joan L. Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Evidence for Linguistic Relativity [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 198] Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds), 107–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds), 157–191. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004. How people move: Discourse effects of linguistic typology. In Discourse Across Languages and Cultures [Studies in Language Companion Series 68], Carol Lynn Moder & Aida Martinovic-Zic (eds), 195–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, Kopecka, Anetta & Majid, Asifa. 2014. Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics 25(4): 701–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary. 1983. Verb-descriptivity in German and English: A Contrastive Study. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Soroli, Efstathia. 2011. Typology and spatial cognition in English, French and Greek: Evidence from eye-tracking. In Proceedings of the Fourth ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, ExLing 2011: 25–27 May 2011, Paris, France, Antonis Botinis (ed.), 127–130. Athens: University of Athens.Google Scholar
van Staden, Miriam. 2007. ‘Please open the fish’: Verbs of separation in Tidore, a Papuan language of Eastern Indonesia. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 297–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Staden, Miriam & Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2013. Granularity in the cross-linguistic encoding of motion and location. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 134–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane & Nüse, Ralf. 2003. Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics 41(5): 851–881. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 15–18, 1991: General Session and Parasession on the Grammar of Event Structure, Laurel A. Sutton, Christopher R. Johnson & Ruth Shields (eds), 480–519. Berkeley CA: BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics 2(2): 133–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Past, present, and future of motion research. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2007. Semantic categories of cutting and breaking: Some final thoughts. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 331–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teo, Amos. 2007. Breaking up is Hard to do: Teasing Apart Morphological Complexity in Iwaidja and Maung. Bachelor Thesis, University of Melbourne.
Toups, Melissa A., Kitchen, Andrew, Light, Jessica E. & Reed, David L. 2011. Origin of clothing lice indicates early clothing use by anatomically modern humans in Africa. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(1): 29–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trier, Jost. 1934. Das sprachliche Feld: Eine Auseinandersetzung. In Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung, Ernst Wilmanns & Eduard Schön (eds), 428–449. Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar
Tutton, Mark. 2013. Granularity, space, and motion-framed location. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 149–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkerk, Annemarie. 2013. Scramble, scurry and dash: The correlation between motion event encoding and manner verb lexicon size in Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change 3: 169–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Diachronic change in Indo-European motion event encoding. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4(1): 40–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Åke. 2006. Towards a lexical profile of the Swedish verb lexicon. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59(1): 103–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vostantzoglou = Βοσταντζόγλου, Θεολόγος. 2008. Αντιλεξικόν ή Ονομαστικόν της Νεοελληνικής Γλώσσης. 3. edn. Αθήνα: Νήμα.Google Scholar
Vulchanova, Mila & van der Zee, Emile (eds). 2013. Motion Encoding in Language and Space. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vulchanova, Mila, Martinez, Liliana & Vulchanov, Valentin. 2013. Distinctions in the linguistic encoding of motion: Evidence from a free naming task. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 11–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Laurel J. 1976. Position in grammar: Sit, stand, lie. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 16–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wehrle, Hugo & Eggers, Hans. 1967. Deutscher Wortschatz: Ein Wegweiser zum treffenden Ausdruck, 13. Auflage. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1982. Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat? Language 58(4): 753–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Cups and mugs: Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Australian Journal of Linguistics 4(2): 205–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. What’s in a noun? (Or: How do nouns differ in meaning from adjectives?). Studies in Language 10(2): 353–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wnuk, Ewelina. 2016a. Semantic Specificity of Perception vVrbs in Maniq. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
. 2016b. Specificity at the basic level in event taxonomies: The case of Maniq verbs of ingestion. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2016), Anna Papafragou, Daniel Grodner, Daniel Mirman & John Trueswell (eds), 2687–2692. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Yükseler, Hitay. 1987. Turkish nominal compounds. In Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 7, Peter Avery & Hitay Yükseler (eds), 83–102. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Zacks, Jeffrey M. & Tversky, Barbara. 2001. Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin 127(1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Granularity in taxonony, time, and space. In Vulchanova & van der Zee (eds), 123–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar