References
Adli, Aria
2005Gradedness and Consistency in Grammaticality Judgments. In Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives, Stephan Kepser & Marga Reis (eds), 7–25. Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006French wh-in-situ Questions and Syntactic Optionality: Evidence from Three Data Types. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 25: 163–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich
2003Dialektschwund, Dialekt-Standard-Kontinuum, Diglossie: Drei Typen des Verhältnisses Dialekt – Standardvarietät im deutschen Sprachgebiet. In Standardfragen. Soziolinguistische Perspektiven auf Sprachgeschichte, Sprachkontakt und Sprachvariation, Janis K. Androutsopoulos & Evelyn Ziegler (eds), 163–171. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
2005Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In Perspectives on Variation. Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 163], Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds), 7–42. Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bader, Thomas & Penner, Zvi
1988A Government-Binding account of the complementizer system in Bernese Swiss German [Arbeitspapier 25]. Universität Bern, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Brandner, Ellen
2008Wie oberflächlich ist die syntaktische Variation zwischen Dialekten? Doubly-filled COMP revisited. In Dialektale Morphologie, dialektale Syntax. Beiträge zum 2. Kongress der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen, Franz Patocka & Guido Seiler (eds), 9–26. Wien: Praesens.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul
1998Functional phonology: formalizing the interaction between articulatory and perceptual drives [LOT dissertations 11]. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce
2001Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 45–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1977Meaning and Form. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Deo, Ashwini
2001Grammatical constraints on variation: ‘be’ in the Survey of English Dialects and (Stochastic) Optimality Theory. Stanford: Stanford University.
Broekhuis, Hans & den Dikken, Marcel
2012Syntax of Dutch: Nouns and Noun Phrases. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2009Can we factor out free choice? In Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar, Andreas Dufter, Jürg Fleischer & Guido Seiler (eds), 183–201. Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul & Williams, Ann
2005Phonology, grammar and discourse in dialect convergence. In Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds), 135–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1977Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
Cognola, Federica
2014The Mixed OV/VO Syntax of Mòcheno in Main Clauses: On the Interaction between High and Low Left Periphery. In Theoretical Approaches to Disharmonic Word Order, Theresa Biberauer & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 1–143. Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cognola, Federica, Boranchelli, Ivano & Molinari, Evelina
2019Inter- vs. Intra-Speaker Variation in Mixed Heritage Syntax: A Statistical Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 10(1528). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cognola, Federica & Moroni, Manuela C.
2018Die Kodierung der Informationsstruktur im Fersentalerischen. Die Syntax-Prosodie-Schnittstelle. In Deutsch als Minderheitensprache in Italien, Stefan Rabanus (ed), 79–115. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie
2009Empirical syntax: Idiolectal variability in two- and three-verb clusters in regional standard Dutch and Dutch dialects. In Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar, Andreas Dufter, Jürg Fleischer & Guido Seiler (eds), 203–224. Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang
1999What is natural in Natural Morphology (NM)? Prague Linguistic Circle Papers 3: 135–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edisyn
2005–2012European Dialect Syntax. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute. [URL] (20 February 2023).
Eide, Kristin M. & Åfarli, Tor A.
2020Dialects, registers and intraindividual variation: Outside the scope of generative frameworks? Nordic Journal of Linguistics 43(3): 233–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua
1967Bilingualism with and without Diglossia; Diglossia with and without Bilingualism. Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues 23: 29–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg, Lenz, Alexandra & Weiß, Helmut
2016SyHD-atlas. Ludwig M. Breuer (concept), Katrin Kuhmichel, Stephanie Leser-Cronau, Johanna Schwalm & Thomas Strobel (collaboration). Marburg, Wien, Frankfurt a. M.: Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2000Negative … concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Elvira
2021Syntaktischer Atlas der deutschen Schweiz. Vol. 1: Einleitung und Kommentare, Elvira Glaser, Gabriela Bart, Claudia Bucheli Berger, Guido Seiler, Sandro Bachmann & Anja Hasse (eds), Matthias Friedli & Janine Richner-Steiner (collaboration). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Glaser, Elvira & Frey, Natascha
2007Doubling Phenomena in Swiss German Dialects [Papers published in Edisyn (European Dialect Syntax)]. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut. [URL] (20 February 2023).
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2006Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1): 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodler, Werner
1969Berndeutsche Syntax. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric
1993Dialectal Variation Inside CP as Parametric Variation. In Dialektsyntax, Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds), 161–179. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IDS Mannheim, Datenbank für Gesprochenes Deutsch (DGD): ZW. Zwirner-Korpus
[URL] (20 February 2023).
Kager, René
1999Optimality Theory [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kauhanen, Henri
2019Stable variation in multidimensional competition. In The Determinants of Diachronic stability [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 254], Anne Breitbarth, Miriam Bouzouita, Lieven Danckaert & Melissa Farasyn (eds), 263–290. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1994Morphosyntactic variation. In Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 2: The parasession on variation in linguistic theory, Katharine Beals, Jeannette Denton, Robert Knippen, Lynette Melnar, Hisami Suzuki & Erica Zeinfeld (eds), 180–201. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2001Syntactic Change. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 699–729. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lundquist, Björn, Westendorp, Maud & Strand, Bror-Magnus S.
2020Code-switching alone cannot explain intraspeaker syntactic variability: Evidence from a spoken elicitation experiment. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 43(3): 249–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1995Linguistic semantics. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molnárfi, László
2002Focus and antifocus inmodern Afrikaans and West Germanic. Linguistics 40(6): 1107–1160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moser, Ann-Marie
2019Form und Funktion der doppelten Negation in deutschen Dialekten, mit einem Schwerpunkt im Oberdeutschen. Linguistik online 98(5): 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021aNegationskongruenz in den deutschen Dialekten [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte. 185]. Stuttgart: Steiner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021bDie Standardisierung des Deutschen im Spannungsfeld von Nähe und Distanz. Zum Verlust der doppelten Negation in der konzeptionellen Schriftlichkeit. In Was bleibt von kommunikativer Nähe und Distanz? Mediale und konzeptionelle Aspekte von Diskurstraditionen und sprachlichem Wandel [ScriptOralia 144], Teresa Gruber, Klaus Grübl & Thomas Scharinger (eds), 235–253. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon
2000Elemente der optimalitätstheoretischen Syntax [Stauffenburg Linguistik 20]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
Noel Aziz Hanna, Patrizia & Smith, Laura C.
2022Introduction: Preferences. In Linguistic Preferences [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 358], Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna & Laura C. Smith (eds), 1–14. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rosenkvist, Henrik
2015The syntax and meaning of subject doubling in Övdalian. In Studies in Övdalian Morphology and Syntax. New research on a lesser-known Scandinavian language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 221], Kristine Bentzen, Henrik Rosenkvist & Janne Bondi Johannessen (eds), 107–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowley, Anthony
2003Liacht as de Sproch. Grammatica Della Lingua Mòchena. Grammatik des Deutsch-Fersentalerischen. Palù del Fersina: Istituto Culturale Mòcheno.Google Scholar
Ruoff, Arno
1955–1956Collection of unpublished interviews from Vorarlberg/Austria, made available by Oliver Schallert.Google Scholar
1973Grundlagen und Methoden der Untersuchung gesprochener Sprache [Idiomatica 1]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Schallert, Oliver, Dröge, Alexander & Pheiff, Jeffrey
accepted). Doubly-filled COMPs in Dutch and German. A Bottom-up Approach. Linguistics.
Schönherr, Beatrix
2016Sprach- und Sprechformen zwischen Dialekt und Standardsprache. Empirische Untersuchungen auf einem wenig erforschten Terrain: Vorarlberg. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 83(3): 315–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seiler, Guido
2004On three types of dialect variation, and their implications for linguistic theory. Evidence from verb clusters in Swiss German dialects. In Dialectology meets Typology. Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Bernd Kortmann, 367–399. Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005Wie verlaufen syntaktische Isoglossen, und welche Konsequenzen sind daraus zu ziehen? In Moderne Dialekte – neue Dialektologie. Akten des 1. Kongresses der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen (IGDD) [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte 130], Eckhard Eggers, Jürgen E. Schmidt & Dieter Stellmacher, 313–341. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Ulbrich, Christiane & Werth, Alexander
2021What is Intra-individual Variation in Language? In Intra-individual Variation in Language [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 363], Alexander Werth, Lars Bülow, Simone E. Pfenninger & Markus Schiegg (eds), 9–43. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1991Relative der and other C0 Elements in Danish. Lingua 84: 109–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C.
2016Extraposition is disappearing. Language 92: e237–e256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Helmut
2001Information structure meets Minimalist syntax. On argument order and case morphology in Bavarian. In: Making Sense: From Lexeme to Discourse [GAGL 44], Geart van der Meer & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 21–34. Center for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
2013UG und syntaktische (Mikro-)Variation. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 19: 171–205.Google Scholar
2016Doppelte Negation. In SyHD-atlas, Jürg Fleischer, Alexandra Lenz & Helmut Weiß (eds), Ludwig M. Breuer (concept), Katrin Kuhmichel, Stephanie Leser-Cronau, Johanna Schwalm & Thomas Strobel (collaboration), 450–461. Marburg, Wien, Frankfurt a. M.: Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wöllstein, Angelika & Dudenredaktion
(ed) 2016Duden. Die Grammatik: unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch. 9th, fully revised and updated edition. Berlin: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2004West Germanic verb clusters. The empirical domain. In Verb clusters. A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch, Katalin É. Kiss & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 43–85. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2004Sentential Negation and Negative Concord [LOT dissertations 101]. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
Zwirner, Eberhard & Bethge, Wolfgang
1958Erläuterungen zu den Texten. Mit 2 Tafeln [Lautbibliothek der deutschen Mundarten 1]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar