Cover not available
Part of
Predication in African Languages
Edited by James Essegbey and Enoch O. Aboh
[Studies in Language Companion Series 235] 2024
► pp. 154–188

Chapter 6
Lost siblings

Areal forces in the divergence of Krio and Pichi

| The University of Hong Kong
The two related English-lexifier creole languages Krio (Sierra Leone) and Pichi (Equatorial Guinea) have diverged due to differing contact ecologies since their split in the 19th century. Krio is spoken alongside its lexifier English as well as Atlantic and Mande adstrates. Pichi is spoken alongside Bantu adstrates and has been in contact with its superstrate Spanish, but not with English. I analyse and compare tense, aspect, and mood categories as well as participant marking and serial verb constructions to show that (a) Krio has become more similar to English than Pichi to Spanish because existing overlaps between creole and lexifier forms have facilitated transfer; (b) both Krio and Pichi have, respectively, aligned themselves with the Macro-Sudan and Bantu spread zone typological profiles of their ecologies. I interpret the findings via the stratal-areal contact model (Yakpo 2017a) to explain the divergence of Krio and Pichi as part of the differentiation of the whole African Caribbean English Creole cluster.
Keywords: Creole, Krio, Pichi, English, Spanish, Bantu, areal typology, language contact
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Socio-historical background and linguistic ecologies
  • 3.Comparison of Krio and Pichi
    • 3.1Tense-aspect-mood marking
    • 3.2Expression of participant roles
    • 3.3Serial verb constructions
    • 3.4Summary of findings
  • 4.The stratal areal contact model: Genetic divergence and areal advergence of the African Caribbean English Creole varieties
    • 4.1Contact with the lexifier superstrate (a) vs. Contact with a non-lexifier superstrate (b)
    • 4.2Contact with adstrates (c) and strengthening/weakening of Macro-Sudan features (d)
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Conventions for interlinear glosses and abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 18 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.235.06yak
References (92)
References
Alleyne, Mervyn C. 1980. Comparative Afro-American: An Historical-Comparative Study of English-Based Afro-American Dialects of the New World. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. 1990. The grammatical packaging of experiencers in Ewe: A study in the semantics of syntax. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10: 139–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992a. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2): 101–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992b. The meaning of phatic and conative interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2): 245–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Ideophones and the nature of the adjective word class in Ewe. In Ideophones (Typological Studies in Language 44), F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds), 25–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003a. Grammar and cultural practices: The grammaticalization of triadic communication in West African languages. Journal of West African Languages 30(2): 5–28.Google Scholar
2003b. Prepositions and postpositions in Ewe (Gbe): Empirical and theoretical considerations. In Typologie des Langues d’Afrique et Universaux de la Grammaire, vol. v. 2, Patrick Sauzet & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds), 41–67. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
2005a. Forms of secondary predication in serializing languages: on depictives in Ewe. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds), 355–378. Oxford Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b. Multiverb constructions on the West African littoral: microvariation and areal typology. In Grammar and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Lars Hellan, Mila Dimitrova-Vulchanova & Tor A. Åfarli (eds.), 15–42. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
2006. Ewe serial verb constructions and their grammatical context. In Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Aleksandra, Aikhenvald Y. & M W Dixon Robert (eds), 124–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007. Grammars in contact in the Volta Basin (West Africa): On contact induced grammatical change in Likpe. In Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Aleksandra, Aikhenvald Y. & Robert Dixon, M. W. (eds), 114–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2017. Language Typology and Universals (STUF). Special Issue: The Ghana-Togo Mountain Languages. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. 2020. Access rituals in West African communities: An ethnopragmatic perspective. In Ritual Communication, Gunter Senft & Ellen Basso (eds), 127–155. Oxford: Berg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Breedveld, Anneke. 2004. Areal cultural scripts for social interaction in West African communities. Intercultural Pragmatics 1(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Essegbey, James. 2017. Divergence and convergence among the Ghana-Togo Mountain languages. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Dakubu, Mary E Kropp. 2008. Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages (Studies in Language Companion Series 100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Levinson, Stephen C. 2007. The typology and semantics of locative predicates: posturals, positionals, and other beasts. Linguistics 45(5/6): 847–871. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Terkourafi, Marina. 2019. What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. Journal of Pragmatics. Elsevier B.V 145: 72–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arends, Jacques. 1989. Syntactic Developments in Sranan: Creolization as a Gradual Process. PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.
Arsenec, Nicole. 2020. Serial verbs in Jamaican and Martinican. [URL]. (12 February, 2022).
Bickerton, Derek. 1973. On the nature of a Creole continuum. Language 49(3): 640–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and brain sciences 7(02): 173–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolekia Boleká, Justo. 2007. La enculturación Bubi Desde los Préstamos Léxicos del pidgin-English: Procesos de lexicalización Progresiva. PhD thesis, University of Salamanca.
. 2016. La lengua bubi: ¿desaparición o rehabilitación? PLATÔ (Revista Digital do Instituto Internacional da Língua Portuguesa) (Glotopolítica Na Guiné Equatorial) 3(6): 60–73.Google Scholar
Bordal Steien, Guri & Yakpo, Kofi. 2020. Romancing with tone: On the outcomes of prosodic contact. Language 96(1): 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert. 1992. Des îles, des Hommes, des langues: Essai sur la Créolisation Linguistique et Culturelle. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Encoding the distinction between location, source, and destination: A typological study. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories (Typological Studies in Language 66), Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Hope. 2003. Defining the outcome of language contact: Old English and Old Norse. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics (57): 40–57.Google Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1971. Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, Dell Hymes (ed), 349–370. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Essegbey, James. 2015. Verb semantics and argument structure in Gbe and Sranan. In Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs (TiLSM) 275), Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds), 175–206. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Essegbey, James A. B. K. & Ameka, Felix K. 2007. “Cut” and “break” verbs in Gbe and Sranan. Journal of pidgin and Creole Languages 22(1): 37–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas G. 1996. Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finney, Malcolm Awadajin. 2004. Substratal influence on the morphosyntactic properties of Krio. Linguistic Discovery 2(2): 58–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Krio. In The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages: English-based and Dutch-based Languages, vol. 1, Susanne Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds), 157–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL]
Fyfe, Christopher. 1962. A History of Sierra Leone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fyle, Magbaily C. 2004. The Yoruba Diaspora in Sierra Leone’s Krio Society. In The Yoruba Diaspora in the Atlantic World, Toyin Falola & Matt Childs, D. (eds), 366–382. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fyle, Margaret Sophia. 1998. Yoruba Loan Words in Krio: A Study of Language and Culture Change. MA thesis, Ohio State University.
Gaetano, Berruto. 2005. Dialect/standard convergence, mixing, and models of language contact: The case of Italy. In Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds), 81–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gebhart, Ute. 1991. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zu seriellen Verbalkonstruktionen im West African Pidgin English and Krio. Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar
Granda, Gérman de. 1985. Estudios de Lingüística Afro-Románica. Valladolid, España: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. The Macro-Sudan belt: Towards identifying a linguistic area in northern sub-Saharan Africa. In A Linguistic Geography of Africa, Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds), 151–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Proto-Bantu and Proto-Niger-Congo: Macro-areal typology and linguistic resconstruction. In Geographical Typology and Linguistic Areas: With Special Reference to Africa (Studies in Linguistics 2), Osama Hieda, Christa Kōnig & Hiroshi Nakagawa (eds), 109–141. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Areal linguistics beyond contact, and linguistic areas of Afrabia. In The Languages and Linguistics of Africa (The World of Linguistics (WOL) 11), Tom Güldemann (ed), 448–545. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert A. Jr. 1966. Pidgin and Creole Languages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ian F. 1971. A Study of the Sources and Development of the Lexicon of Sierra Leone Krio. PhD dissertation, University of London.
1986. The domestic hypothesis, diffusion and componentiality: An account of Atlantic Anglophone creole origins. In Substrata Versus Universals in Creole Genesis, Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds), 71–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. A preliminary classification of Anglophone Atlantic creoles, with syntactic data from thirty-three representative dialects. In Pidgin and Creole Languages: Essays in Memory of John Reinecke, Glenn Gilbert, G. (ed), 264–333. Honolulu: Univ. of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
2017. A pan-Creole innovation? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 32(1): 159–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Belong. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages. John Benjamins 33(1): 192–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Magnus. 1999. Ghanaian Pidgin English in its West African Context: A Sociohistorical and structural Analysis (Varieties of English Around the World G24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttar, George L., Aboh, Enoch O. & Ameka, Felix K. 2013. Relative clauses in Suriname creoles and Gbe languages. Lingua 129: 96–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttar, George L., Essegbey, James & Ameka, Felix K. 2007. Gbe and other West African sources of Suriname creole semantic structures. (Ed.) Bettina Migge. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22(1): 57–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2002. Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External, and Extra-linguistic Factors, In Mari Jones, C. & Edith Esch (eds), 285–314. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Alex C. 1992. Varieties of Krio and Standard Krio. In Reading and Writing Krio, Eldred Jones, D., Karl Sandred, I. & Neville Shrimpton (eds), 21–30. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Krio Corpus Project. 2003. Umeå University, Krio Corpus Project. The Krio Corpus Project. [URL]. (6 December, 2020).
Law, Danny. 2013. Inherited similarity and contact-induced change in Mayan Languages. Journal of Language Contact 6(2): 271–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynn, Martin. 1984. Commerce, Christianity and the origins of the “Creoles” of Fernando Po. The Journal of African History 25(3): 257–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Technology, trade and “A Race of Native Capitalists”: The Krio diaspora of West Africa and the Steamship, 1852–95. The Journal of African History. Cambridge University Press 33(3): 421–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martino, Enrique. 2012. Clandestine Recruitment Networks in the Bight of Biafra: Fernando Pó’s Answer to the Labour Question, 1926–1945. International Review of Social History. Cambridge University Press 57(S20): 39–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus J. 1996. Varietätenkonvergenz: Überlegungen zu einem Baustein einer Theorie der Sprachvariation. (Ed.) Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Klaus J. Mattheier. Sociolinguistica 10(1): 31–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgades Besari, Trinidad. 2011. Los criollos (Fernandinos-Kriös) de Guinea Ecuatorial. La Gaceta de Guinea Ecuatorial. Malabo, Equatorial Guinea, No. 162 edition, sec. Misceláneas.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter & Smith, Norval. 2015. Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs (TiLSM) 275). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Njeuma, Bernadette Josso. 1995. Structural Similarities between Sierra Leone Krio and the Two West African Anglophone Pidgins: A Case for Common Origin. Ann Arbor: UMI.Google Scholar
Nkengasong, Nkemngong. 2016. A Grammar of Cameroonian Pidgin. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Nyampong, Beatrice Owusua. 2015. Serial Verb Constructions in Krio and Akan. MA thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Rickford, John R. 1987. Dimensions of a Creole Continuum: History, Texts, and Linguistic Analysis of Guyanese Creole. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette. 2007. Types of loan: Matter and pattern. In Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology (EALT): 38), Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds), 15–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Norval. 1987. The Genesis of the Creole Languages of Surinam. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
. 2017. Krio as the Western Maroon Creole language of Jamaica, and the /na/ isogloss. In Language Library (53), Cecelia Cutler, Zvjezdana Vrzić & Philipp Angermeyer (eds), Creole 251–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundiata, Ibrahim K. 1990. Equatorial Guinea: Colonialism, State Terror, and the Search for Stability. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Pearce, Esther. 1989. Bad man bɛtɛ pas ɛmti os (Krio Publications Series 6). Umeå: Umeå University.Google Scholar
Velde, Mark L O van de. 2008. A Grammar of Eton. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1997. Re-examining Caribbean English Creole continua. World Englishes 16(2): 233–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi. 2013a. Pichi. In The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures: English-based and Dutch-based Languages, vol. 1, Susanne Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds), 194–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL]. (9 June, 2020).
. 2013b. Wayward daughter: Language contact in the emergence of Pichi (Equatorial Guinea). Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 34(2): 275–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. O estatuto do pichi na Guiné Equatorial. PLATÔ (Revista Digital do Instituto Internacional da Língua Portuguesa) (Glotopolítica Na Guiné Equatorial) 3(6): 20–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Creole in transition: Contact with Dutch and typological change in Sranan. In Boundaries and Bridges: Language Contact in Multilingual Ecologies (Language Contact and Bilingualism (LCB) 14), Kofi Yakpo & Pieter Muysken (eds), 57–85. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017c. Unity in diversity: The homogeneity of the substrate and the grammar of space in the African and Caribbean English-lexifier Creoles. In Language Contact in Africa and the African Diaspora in the Americas. In Honor of John V. Singler (Creole Language Library (CLL) 53), Cecelia Cutler, Zvjezdana Vrzic & Philipp Angermeyer (eds), 225–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019b. A Grammar of Pichi (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 23). Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020a. Social factors. In The Routledge Handbook of Language Contact (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics 24), Evangelia Adamou & Yaron Matras (eds), 129–146. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020b. Sociolinguistic characteristics of the English-lexifier contact languages of West Africa. In Advances in Contact Linguistics: In Honour of Pieter Muysken (Contact Language Library (CoLL) 57), Norval Smith, Tonjes Veenstra & Enoch Oladé Aboh (eds), 61–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021a. Social entrenchment influences the amount of areal borrowing in contact languages. International Journal of Bilingualism (Published online). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021b. Creole prosodic systems are areal, not simple. Frontiers in Psychology 12. 690593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021c. Unidirectional multilingual convergence: Typological and social factors. International Journal of Multilingualism (Published online). 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023a. Two types of language contact involving English Creoles: Why Krio (Sierra Leone) has evolved more towards English than its relative Pichi (Equatorial Guinea) towards Spanish. English Today 39(1): 12–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023b. The indigenization of Ghanaian Pidgin English. World Englishes (Published online). 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi & Muysken, Pieter. 2017. Boundaries and Bridges: Language Contact in Multilingual Ecologies (Language Contact and Bilingualism (LCB) 14). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi & Smith, Norval. 2020. The Atlantic. In The Routledge Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics 25), Umberto Ansaldo & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), 179–198. 1st edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yakubovich, Ilya. 2010. Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yillah, Mohamed Sorie & Corcoran, Chris. 2007. Krio (Creole English). In Comparative creole syntax: Parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars, John Holm & Peter Patrick, L. (eds), London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar