Complement Clauses versus Relative Clauses

Cited by 11 other publications

Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova

2017.  In Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia [Typological Studies in Language, 116], ► pp. 121 ff.

Hook, Peter Edwin & Prashant Pardeshi

2017.  In Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia [Typological Studies in Language, 116], ► pp. 293 ff.

Jenks, Peter

2014. Generalized Clausal Modifiers in Thai Noun Phrases. Syntax 17:4 ► pp. 299 ff.

Lichtenberk, Frantisek

2016. Complementation in Oceanic: Focus on Complementizers*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:3 ► pp. 451 ff.

OZEKI, HIROMI & YASUHIRO SHIRAI

2010. Semantic bias in the acquisition of relative clauses in Japanese. Journal of Child Language 37:1 ► pp. 197 ff.

Pereira, Antonia Alves

2013. Estratégias de complementação em Asurini do Xingu. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 13:1 ► pp. 135 ff.

Shibatani, Masayoshi

2019.  In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 15 ff.

Ueno, Mieko & Susan M. Garnsey

2008. An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:5 ► pp. 646 ff.

Weiß, Helmut

2020. Where do complementizers come from and how did they come about?. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 2:1 ► pp. 30 ff.

Yabuki-Soh, Noriko

2019. Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking Theoretical and Geographical Boundaries. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 271 ff.

Zhang, Niina Ning

2019. Appearance and Existence in Mandarin Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 101 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.