Implications for morphosyntax: Syntactic vs. morphological case

Spencer, Andrew

doi:10.1075/slcs.77.03spe

Part of

Case, Valency and Transitivity
Edited by Leonid Kulikov, Andrej L. Malchukov and Peter de Swart
[Studies in Language Companion Series 77] 2006
► pp. 3–21

Syntactic vs. morphological case

Implications for morphosyntax

Andrew Spencer

Published online: 15 November 2006

https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.77.03spe

Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Order by:

SIGURÐSSON, EINAR FREYR & MILENA ŠEREIKAITĖ

2023. The dual face of structural object case: on Lithuanian genitive of negation. Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.

Dalrymple, Mary, John J. Lowe & Louise Mycock

2019. The Oxford Reference Guide to Lexical Functional Grammar,

Matić, Dejan

2019. A case for syntactic case: the accusative in Tundra Yukaghir. Morphology 29:3 ► pp. 337 ff.

Arkadiev, Peter

2017. Multiple ergatives. Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 717 ff.

Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis

2017. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity,

Diewald, Gabriele

2016. Non-central usages of datives. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.