Ditransitive clauses in English with special reference to Lancashire dialect

Anna Siewierska

Willem B. Hollmann

Unlike many other languages, English has three ditransitive constructions; a prepositional one in which the recipient or beneficiary is marked by a preposition and two double object constructions, one in which the recipient precedes the theme and the other in which the theme precedes the recipient. The availability and use of these three constructions in different dialects of English has long been an issue of controversy. This paper offers actual corpus data relating to the distribution of the three ditransitive constructions in one English dialect, namely Lancashire dialect. It shows that in cases where both the recipient and theme are pronominal, the double object construction with theme > recipient order is not only possible but in fact dominant.

Published online: 29 March 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.83.06sie

Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Biggs, Alison

2016. Locating variation in the dative alternation. Linguistic Variation 16:2 ► pp. 151 ff.

Diessel, Holger

2019. In The Grammar Network,

Ebensgaard Jensen, Kim

2016. Cross-domain variation in the X itself as a grammatical construction. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 3:2 ► pp. 177 ff.

Goldberg, Adele E.

2020. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 59 ff.

Holmberg, Anders, Michelle Sheehan & Jenneke van der Wal

2019. Movement from the Double Object Construction Is Not Fully Symmetrical. Linguistic Inquiry 50:4 ► pp. 677 ff.

Hundt, Marianne

2018. In The Noun Phrase in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 246], ► pp. 113 ff.

Larson, Richard K.

2017. On “Dative Idioms” in English. Linguistic Inquiry 48:3 ► pp. 389 ff.

Lorente Sánchez, Juan

2018. ‘Give it him and then I’ll give you money for it’. The dative alternation in Contemporary British English. Research in Corpus Linguistics ► pp. 15 ff.

SHIBASAKI, REIJIROU

2017. <i>Morphosyntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2 ► pp. 591 ff.

Theijssen, Daphne

2010. In Interfaces: Explorations in Logic, Language and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6211], ► pp. 87 ff.

Toquero-Pérez, Luis Miguel

2021. Revisiting extraction and subextraction patterns from arguments. Linguistic Variation

Tucker, Gordon H.

2014. In Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 68], ► pp. 33 ff.

Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria

2016. “May Depend on Me Sending It You”. Journal of English Linguistics 44:2 ► pp. 138 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.