How complex are isolating languages? The Compensation Hypothesis suggests that isolating languages make up for simpler morphology with greater complexity in other domains, such as syntax and semantics. This paper provides detailed argumentation against the Compensation Hypothesis. A cross-linguistic experiment measuring the complexity of compositional semantics shows that isolating languages rely more heavily on simple Associational Semantics, in which the interpretation of a combined expression is maximally vague or underdifferentiated, anything having to do with the interpretations of the constituent parts. In addition, it is argued that such vagueness is not necessarily resolved via recourse to context and a more complex pragmatics. Thus, it is concluded that isolating languages may indeed be of greater overall simplicity that their non-isolating counterparts.
2021. Tense–aspect–mood marking, language-family size and the evolution of predication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
Gil, David
2023. Bare and Constructional Compositionality. International Journal of Primatology
Gil, David & Yeshayahu Shen
2019. How Grammar Introduces Asymmetry Into Cognitive Structures: Compositional Semantics, Metaphors, and Schematological Hybrids. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Gil, David & Yeshayahu Shen
2021. Metaphors: the evolutionary journey from bidirectionality to unidirectionality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
Jantunen, Tommi
2013. Ellipsis in Finnish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36:3 ► pp. 303 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.