The paper addresses two related questions: whether the principle that nominal arguments must be projections of D, apparently holding in many Romance languages, holds in English and in other languages as well; and why such a principle should exist at all. The answer empirically suggested to the first question is that the principle does hold in English, contrary to Chierchia (1998) and supporting the N-movement approach to the nominal Romance-Germanic parametrization proposed by Longobardi (1996), but that certain other languages, specifically Japanese, are likely to exhibit nominal arguments without D, as expected in Chierchia’s (1998) framework. Following the restrictive approach to phrase structure proposed by Chomsky (1995, ch 4.), the second question will be addressed by identifying D with the Person head and by arguing that the latter feature is crucial to allow type-shifting from property- to individual-denotation. Under a minimalist theory of parameter formats, it will be argued that all the three possible polymorphic realizations of the feature Person admitted by such a theory are crosslinguistically instantiated, precisely by Japanese, English, and Italian.
2020. Czech analytic agreement and the characteristics of littlepro. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 65:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
2012. Measure Words as Nouns: A Perspective From Silent Years. Studia Linguistica 66:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Zeller, Jochen & J. Paul Ngoboka
2018. Agreement with locatives in Kinyarwanda: a comparative analysis. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.