Dissertation Abstracts
The syntax and the processing of argument relations in Austrian Sign
Language (ÖGS)
References (16)
Bornkessel, Ina, Brian McElree, Matthias Schlesewsky & Angela D. Friederici
2004 Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength:
Dissociating phrase structure from case marking.
Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4). 495–522.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Kamal K. Choudhary, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich & Balthasar Bickel
2008 Bridging the gap between processing preferences and typological
distributions: Initial evidence from the online comprehension of control
constructions in Hindi. In
Marc Richards &
Andrej L. Malchukov (eds.),
Scales (Linguistische ArbeitsBerichte 86), 397–436. Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2009 Processing syntax and morphology. A neurocognitive perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crocker, Matthew W.
1994 On the nature of the principle-based sentence
processor. In
Charles Clifton, Jr.,
Lyn Frazier &
Keith Rayner (eds.),
Perspectives on sentence processing, 245–266. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emmorey, Karen
2002 Language, cognition, and the brain. Insights from sign language
research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frazier, Lyn & Janet D. Fodor
1978 The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing
model.
Cognition 6(4). 291–325.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedman, Lynn A.
1976 The manifestation of subject, object, and topic in the American
Sign Language. In
Charles N. Li (ed.),
Subject and topic, 125–148. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geraci, Carlo
2013 Spatial syntax in your hands. Presentation at “Language Seminar“, CNRS Institut Jean-Nicod & DEC, Paris.
Haupt, Friederike S., Matthias Schlesewsky, Dietmar Roehm, Angela D. Friederici & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2008 The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language
comprehension architecture.
Journal of Memory and Language 59(1). 54–96.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
He, Yifei
2016 Interactive processing within and beyond sentence-level: An ERP
investigation of simple and complex Chinese sentences. Mainz (Germany): University of Mainz PhD dissertation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krebs, Julia
2013 The processing of word order variations in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS).
An ERP-study on subject preference. Salzburg (Austria): University of Salzburg Master’s thesis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kretzschmar, Franziska, Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Adrian Staub, Dietmar Roehm & Matthias Schlesewsky
2012 Prominence facilitates ambiguity resolution: On the interaction
between referentiality, thematic roles and word order in syntactic
reanalysis. In
Monique Lamers &
Peter de Swart (eds.),
Case, word order, and prominence. Interacting cues in language
production and comprehension, 239–271. Dordrecht: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1976 Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In
Charles N. Li (ed.),
Subject and topic, 457–461. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liddell, Scott
1980 American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlesewsky, Matthias, Gisbert Fanselow, Reinhold Kliegl & Josef Krems
2000 The subject preference in the processing of locally ambiguous
wh-questions in German. In
Barbara Hemforth &
Lars Konieczny (eds.),
German sentence processing, 65–93. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Luming, Matthias Schlesewsky, Balthasar Bickel & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2009 Exploring the nature of the ‘subject’-preference: Evidence from
the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin
Chinese.
Language and Cognitive Processes 24(7–8). 1180–1226.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Krebs, Julia, Dietmar Roehm, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Evie A. Malaia
2021.
Age of sign language acquisition has lifelong effect on syntactic preferences in sign language users.
International Journal of Behavioral Development 45:5
► pp. 397 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Krebs, Julia, Ronnie B. Wilbur, Phillip M. Alday & Dietmar Roehm
2019.
The Impact of Transitional Movements and Non-Manual Markings on the Disambiguation of Locally Ambiguous Argument Structures in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS).
Language and Speech 62:4
► pp. 652 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.