Abstract published In:
Sign Language & LinguisticsVol. 20:2 (2017) ► pp.288–295
Dissertation Abstracts
The syntax and the processing of argument relations in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)
References
Bornkessel, Ina, Brian McElree, Matthias Schlesewsky & Angela D. Friederici
2004 Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength:
Dissociating phrase structure from case marking. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4). 495–522. 
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Kamal K. Choudhary, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich & Balthasar Bickel
2008 Bridging the gap between processing preferences and typological
distributions: Initial evidence from the online comprehension of control
constructions in Hindi. In Marc Richards & Andrej L. Malchukov (eds.),
Scales (Linguistische ArbeitsBerichte 86), 397–436. Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2009 Processing syntax and morphology. A neurocognitive perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crocker, Matthew W.
1994 On the nature of the principle-based sentence
processor. In Charles Clifton, Jr., Lyn Frazier & Keith Rayner (eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing, 245–266. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Emmorey, Karen
2002 Language, cognition, and the brain. Insights from sign language
research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Frazier, Lyn & Janet D. Fodor
1978 The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing
model. Cognition 6(4). 291–325.
Friedman, Lynn A.
1976 The manifestation of subject, object, and topic in the American
Sign Language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 125–148. New York: Academic Press.
Geraci, Carlo
2013 Spatial syntax in your hands. Presentation at “Language Seminar“, CNRS Institut Jean-Nicod & DEC, Paris.
Haupt, Friederike S., Matthias Schlesewsky, Dietmar Roehm, Angela D. Friederici & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2008 The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language
comprehension architecture. Journal of Memory and Language 59(1). 54–96.
He, Yifei
2016 Interactive processing within and beyond sentence-level: An ERP
investigation of simple and complex Chinese sentences. Mainz (Germany): University of Mainz PhD dissertation.
Krebs, Julia
2013 The processing of word order variations in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS).
An ERP-study on subject preference. Salzburg (Austria): University of Salzburg Master’s thesis.
Kretzschmar, Franziska, Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Adrian Staub, Dietmar Roehm & Matthias Schlesewsky
2012 Prominence facilitates ambiguity resolution: On the interaction
between referentiality, thematic roles and word order in syntactic
reanalysis. In Monique Lamers & Peter de Swart (eds.), Case, word order, and prominence. Interacting cues in language
production and comprehension, 239–271. Dordrecht: Springer.
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1976 Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–461. New York: Academic Press.
Liddell, Scott
1980 American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
Schlesewsky, Matthias, Gisbert Fanselow, Reinhold Kliegl & Josef Krems
2000 The subject preference in the processing of locally ambiguous
wh-questions in German. In Barbara Hemforth & Lars Konieczny (eds.), German sentence processing, 65–93. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Wang, Luming, Matthias Schlesewsky, Balthasar Bickel & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2009 Exploring the nature of the ‘subject’-preference: Evidence from
the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin
Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(7–8). 1180–1226.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Krebs, Julia, Dietmar Roehm, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Evie A. Malaia
2021. Age of sign language acquisition has lifelong effect on syntactic preferences in sign language users. International Journal of Behavioral Development 45:5 ► pp. 397 ff. 
Krebs, Julia, Ronnie B. Wilbur, Phillip M. Alday & Dietmar Roehm
2019. The Impact of Transitional Movements and Non-Manual Markings on the Disambiguation of Locally Ambiguous Argument Structures in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS). Language and Speech 62:4 ► pp. 652 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.