To be specified published in:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 21:1 (2018) ► pp. 115–136
Squibs

A new classifier-based plural morpheme in German Sign Language (DGS)

| University of Michigan
German Sign Language (DGS) displays variation in the simple plural, the form of which is conditioned by classes of phonological features within the lexicon. As a consequence, the overt realization of the plural marker is restricted to a small set of nouns specified for the appropriate phonological features, while the rest are left bare (Pfau & Steinbach 2005, 2006; Steinbach 2012). Pfau & Steinbach (2005) report a number of ‘alternative pluralization strategies’ available as repairs for this underspecification, including classifier constructions, spatial localization, and number and quantifier phrases. I propose a previously undescribed mechanism for plural marking, the ‘classifier-based plural morpheme’ (CLP), grammaticalized from the classifier system into a morpheme in the grammars of individual DGS signers. Elicitation data show that this morpheme attaches only to nouns which are specified for phonological features that restrict the realization of the canonical plural marker, adding a new option to the range of pluralization strategies available.
Keywords: German Sign Language, grammaticalization, reduplication, plural marking, classifier predicates
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The canonical plural in DGS
  • 3.Classifiers as alternative strategies for expressing plurality
  • 4.New proposal: New classifier-based plural morpheme (clp)
  • 5.Evidence for the classifier-based morpheme
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00012.her
References

References

Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler
2005 The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 811. 301–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Jörg
1998 Aspekte der Raumnutzung in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin
1997 Turkish. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nash, David
1986 Topics in Warlpiri grammar. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela
2007 Space and iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2005 Plural formation in German Sign Language: Constraints and strategies. In Helen Leuninger & Daniela Happ (eds.), Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung, 569–594. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
2006 Pluralization in sign and speech: A cross-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology 101. 135–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinbach, Markus
2012 Plurality. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language – An international handbook, 112–135. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rathmann, Christian
2000 The optionality of agreement phrase: Evidence from signed languages. Austin, TX: University of Texas MA thesis.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

van Boven, Cindy
2021. Phonological restrictions on nominal pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands: evidence from corpus and elicited data. Folia Linguistica 0:0 Crossref logo
van Boven, Cindy
2021. Phonological restrictions on nominal pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands: evidence from corpus and elicited data. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 313 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.