Introduction published in:
Impersonal human reference in Sign Languages
Edited by Gemma Barberà and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
[Sign Language & Linguistics 21:2] 2018
► pp. 183203
References

References

Alleesaib, Muhsina & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
2013R(eferential)-impersonals in Mauritian Creole. Talk at Conference of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics , 19–21 June 2013, Lisbon.
Alonso Ovalle, Luis
2002Arbitrary pronouns are not that indefinite. In Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Dijkoningen & Paola Monachesi (eds.), Selected papers from Going Romance, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Barberà, Gemma & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
2017aBackgrounded agents in Catalan Sign Language (LSC): passives, middles or impersonals? Language 93. 767–798. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017bTwo indefinite pronouns in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21. 89–105.Google Scholar
Barberà, Gemma & Josep Quer
2013Impersonal reference in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). In Laurence Meurant, Aurélie Sinte, Mieke Van Herreweghe, Myriam Vermeerbergen (eds.), Sign language research, uses and practices: Crossing views on theoretical and applied sign language linguistics, 237–258. Berlin: Ishara Press and de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James
2003Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics 39. 473–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1998Deriving passive without theta roles. In Steven Lapointe, Diane Brentari & Patrick Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 60–99. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
2003Arbitrary readings of third person plural pronominals. In Proceedings of the Conference Sinn und Bedeutung 7, 81–94. Universität Konstanz, FB Linguistik: Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaften Vol 114. http://​www​.ub​.uni​-konstanz​.de​/serials​/fb​-sprach​.htm
2006’Arbitrary’ pro and the theory of pro-drop. In Peter Ackema, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 230–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2017Impersonal passives. In Martin Everaert & Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Vol III, 1887–1930. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1988On si constructions and the theory of arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 521–582.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo
1989Indefinite and generic pronouns. Proceedings of WCCFL 8. 71–84.Google Scholar
Cuxac, Christian
2000La langue des signes française. Les voies de l’iconicité. Faits de langue, vols. 15–16. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Guitteny, Pierre
2006Le passif en langue des signes. Bordeaux: Université Bordeaux III PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry, Barbara O’Dea & Barbara Shaffer
2001The construal of events: Passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 1(3). 281–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärde, Sven
1943Quelques manières d’exprimer l’idée d’un sujet indéterminé ou général en espagnol. Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckeriaktiebolag.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer
2006Passive in the world’s languages. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. I. Clause structure, 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy
1990Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL Lexicon. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues, 149–175. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato & Adrienne Lehrer
1990Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14. 739–759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1998More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Devon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 8. 92–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, John M.
1972Generic to a fault. Proceedings of CLS 8. 247–258. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1973Tracking the generic toad. Proceedings of CLS 9. 320–331. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan & Sigrídur Sigurjónsdóttir
2002The new impersonal construction in Icelandic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5. 97–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, Anna-Lena
2004Form and discourse function of the pointing toward the chest in Swedish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 7(1). 3–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özkul, Aslı & Meltem Kelepir
2015Passive-like constructions with inanimate themes in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Poster presented at Formal and Experimental Approaches to Sign Language Theory . Barcelona, May 2015.
Partee, Barbara
1973Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns. Journal of Philosophy 70(18). 601–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Risler, Annie
2016Parler de soi, parler des autres en langue des signes française. Autopointage et prise de rôle. L’information grammaticale 149. 45–54. (Special issue Langues des signes: le corps en jeu présence, absence, distance, Annie Risler (ed.)).Google Scholar
Saeed, John I. & Lorraine Leeson
1999Detransitivisation in Irish Sign Language. Paper presented at the European Science Foundation Intersign Meeting on Morphosyntax . Siena, March 1999.
Siewierska, Anna
2011Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: Man-constructions vs. third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 57–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Maria Papastathi
2011Towards a typology of third person plural impersonals. Linguistics 49. 575–610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sze, Felix
2010Is there passive in Hong Kong Sign Language? Poster presentation at TISLR 10. Purdue University.
Tóth, Ildikó
2000Inflected infinitives in Hungarian. Tilburg: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Rissman, Lilia, Laura Horton, Molly Flaherty, Ann Senghas, Marie Coppola, Diane Brentari & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2020. The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognition 203  pp. 104332 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.