Article published in:
Impersonal human reference in Sign Languages
Edited by Gemma Barberà and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
[Sign Language & Linguistics 21:2] 2018
► pp. 232256
References

References

Barattieri, Chiara
2006Il periodo ipotetico in LIS. Siena: Università degli Studi di Siena PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Barberà, Gemma
2015The meaning of space in sign language. Reference, specificity and structure in Catalan Sign Language discourse. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton and Ishara Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barberà, Gemma & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
2017aBackgrounded agents in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) – passives, middles or impersonals? Language 93. 767–798. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017bTwo indefinite pronouns in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Sinn und Bedeutung 21. 89–105.Google Scholar
Bertone, Carmela & Anna Cardinaletti
2011ll sistema pronominale della lingua dei segni italiana. In Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 145–160. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Branchini, Chiara
2009Relative libere e interrogative wh- in LIS. In Alcuni capitoli della grammatica della LIS. Atti dell’incontro di studio ‟La grammatica della Lingua dei Segni Italiana”, 101–115. Venice: Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Branchini, Chiara & Caterina Donati
2009Relatively different: Italian Sign Language relative clauses in a typological perspective. In Anikó Lipták (ed.), Correlatives cross-linguistically, 157–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branchini, Chiara & Carlo Geraci
2011L’ordine dei costituenti in LIS: risultati preliminari. In Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 113–126. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
2008Les pronoms impersonnels humains: syntaxe et interprétation. Modèles linguistiques vol. XXIX-1 57. 35–56.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi
2006Strategies of relativization in LIS. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24. 945–975. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Kathryn & Deanna Gagne
In prep. ‟More is up”, pragmatic intuitions are grammaticalized in ASL as overt contextual domain restrictions. Manuscript.
Eugeni, Carlo
2008Una panoramica della situazione dei sordi italiani in generale e della lingua dei segni italiana in particolare. Version updated after amendments by Dino Giglioli president of the National interpreters’ association (ANIMU).
Geraci, Carlo
2012Language policy and planning: The case of Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 12(4). 494–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Spatial syntax in your hands. In Jyoti Iyer & Leland Kusmer (eds.), NELS 44: Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 1, 123–134. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Geraci, Carlo & Valentina Aristodemo
2016An in-depth tour into sentential complementation in Italian Sign Language. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Annika Herrmann (eds.), A matter of complexity: Subordination in sign languages, 95–150. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geraci, Carlo, Carlo Cecchetto & Sandro Zucchi
2008Sentential complementation in Italian Sign Language. In Michael Grosvald & Dionne Soares (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL), 46–58.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus
2002Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 19(3). 245–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K.
2003Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mantovan, Lara
2017Nominal modification in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mantovan, Lara & Carlo Geraci
2015The syntax of cardinal numerals in Italian Sign Language (LIS). In Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 2, 155–165.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
2003A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1). 29–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Donkey anaphora: the view from Sign Language (ASL and LSF). Linguistics and Philosophy 34(4). 341–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Iconic pragmatics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(3). 877–936.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2011Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: Man-constructions vs. third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 57–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro
2004Monsters in the visual mode? Manuscript, Università degli Studi di Milano, http://​www​.filosofia​.unimi​.it​/zucchi​/NuoviFile​/LISmonsters​.pdf
2009Along the time line. Tense and time adverbs in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics 17(2). 99–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar