Article in:
Special Issue in Memory of Irit Meir
Edited by Diane Lillo-Martin, Wendy Sandler, Marie Coppola and Rose Stamp
[Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1/2] 2020
► pp. 1737
References

References

Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
2004Morphological universals and the sign language type. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004, 19–39. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula, Karin van Hoek, Diane Lillo-Martin & Lucinda O’Grady
1988The acquisition of syntax and space in young deaf signers. In Dorothy Bishop & Karen Mogford (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances, 132–149. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Berk, Stephanie
2003Sensitive period effects on the acquisition of language: A study of language development. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Berk, Stephanie & Diane Lillo-Martin
2012The two-word stage: Motivated by linguistic or cognitive constraints? Cognitive Psychology 65(1). 118–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boudreault, Patrick & Rachel Mayberry
2006Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(5). 608–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Östen Dahl, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Coppola, Marie
2002The emergence of the grammatical category of Subject in home sign: Evidence from family-based gesture systems in Nicaragua. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Coppola, Marie & Ann Senghas
2010The emergence of deixis in Nicaraguan signing. In Diane Brentari (Ed.), Sign Languages: A Cambridge Language Survey, 543–569. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costello, Brendan
2015Language and modality: Effects of the use of space in the agreement system of Lengua de Signos Española (Spanish Sign Language). PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam & University of the Basque Country. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen, Ursula Bellugi, Angela Friederici & Petra Horn
1995Effects of age of acquisition on grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics 16(1). 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Adam Schembri & Kearsy Cormier
2018Modification of indicating verbs in British Sign Language: A corpus-based study. Language 94(1). 84–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan & Bonnie Gough
1978Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 18. 17–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002On the evolution of grammatical forms. The transition to language. In Alison Wray (Ed.), Studies in the evolution of language, 376–397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hochgesang, Julie A., Onno Crasborn & Diane Lillo-Martin
2019ASL Signbank. New Haven, CT: Haskins Lab, Yale University. https://​aslsignbank​.haskins​.yale​.edu/
Jackendoff, Ray
1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janis, Wynne D.
1995A crosslinguistic perspective on ASL verb agreement. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 195–223. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Keller, Jörg
1999Using space in German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2. 249–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K.
2000Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 303–320. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard P. Meier
2011On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37. 95–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lourenço, Guilherme
2018Verb agreement in Brazilian Sign Language: Morphophonology, syntax & semantics. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Lourenço, Guilherme & Ronnie B. Wilbur
2018Are plain verbs really plain? Co-localization as the agreement marker in sign languages. FEAST 2, 68–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann
2012Verb agreement. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 136–157. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit
1998Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2002A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20. 430–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The emergence of argument structure in two new sign languages. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (Eds.), Syntax, lexical semantics and event structure, 101–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The evolution of verb classes and verb agreement in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 38. 145–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
2007Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics 43. 531–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
2013Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2). 309–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2011Prospects and challenges for a clitic analysis of (A)SL agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37. 173–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa L.
1990Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science 14. 11–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. & Ted Supalla
2000Sign language research at the millennium. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 103–114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Oomen, Marloes
2017Iconicity in argument structure: Psych-verbs in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language & Linguistics 20(1). 55–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oomen, Marloes & Vadim Kimmelman
2019Body-anchored verbs and argument omission in two sign languages. Glossa 4(1):42. 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol
1983Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego. [Published version 1988, Garland, New York].Google Scholar
1990The relation between space and grammar in ASL morphology. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
2010The grammar of space in two new sign languages. In Diane Brentari (Ed.), Cambridge language surveys: Sign languages, 570–592. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland
2011A point well taken: On the typology and diachrony of pointing. In Donna Jo Napoli & Gaurav Mathur (Eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 144–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2006Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages (Linguistics in Potsdam 24). Potsdam: Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Martin Salzmann & Markus Steinbach
2018The syntax of sign language agreement: Common ingredients, but unusual recipe. Glossa 3(1). 107. 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quadros, Ronice Müller de & Diane Lillo-Martin
2007Gesture and the acquisition of verb agreement in sign languages. In Heather Caunt-Nulton, Samantha Kulatilake & I-hao Woo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 520–531. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Quadros, Ronice Müller de & Josep Quer
2008Back to back(wards) and moving on: On agreement, auxiliaries and verb classes in sign languages. In Ronice Müller de Quadros (Ed.), TISLR9: Sign languages: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future, 530–551. Petrópolis, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.Google Scholar
Rathmann, Christian & Gaurav Mathur
2002Is verb agreement the same cross-modally? In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 370–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Verb agreement as a linguistic innovation in signed languages. In Josep Quer (Ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004, 191–216. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane C. Lillo-Martin
2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Jordan Fenlon & Kearsy Cormier
2018Indicating verbs as typologically unique constructions: Reconsidering verb ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Glossa 3(1). 89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, Ann & Marie Coppola
2001Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science 12. 323–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, Ann, Marie Coppola, Elissa L. Newport & Ted Supalla
1997Argument structure in Nicaraguan Sign Language: The emergence of grammatical devices. In Elizabeth Hughes, Mary Hughes & Annabel Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 550–561. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann
2010The emergence of two functions for spatial devices in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Human Development 53. 287–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B.
1999Metrical structure, morphological gaps, and possible grammaticalization in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 2. 217–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar