Abstract published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 25:2 (2022) ► pp.235244
Clark, Eve V.
2004How language acquisition builds on cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(10). 472–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
İlkbaşaran, Deniz
2015Literacies, mobilities and agencies of deaf youth in Turkey: Constraints and opportunities in the 21st century. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer, Ercenur Ünal & Aslı Özyürek
2022Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults. Memory and Cognition. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer, Ercenur Ünal & Özyürek, A.
Under review. Sign advantage for children: Signing children’s spatial expressions are more informative than speaking children’s speech and gestures combined.
Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer & Aslı Özyürek
2021Effects and non-effects of late language exposure on spatial language development: Evidence from deaf adults and children. Language Learning and Development 171, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Effects of delayed language exposure on spatial language acquisition by signing children and adults. In Glenn Gunzelmann, Andrew Howes, Thora Tenbrink & Eddy Davelaar (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the cognitive science society (CogSci 2017), 2372–2376. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer, Ercenur Ünal & Aslı Özyürek
2021Spatial language use predicts spatial memory of children: Evidence from sign, speech, and speech-plus-gesture. In Tecumseh Fitch, Claus Lamm, Helmut Leder & Kristin Tessmar (eds.), Proceedings of the 43th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2021), 672–678. Vienna: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & John Henner
2021Acquisition of sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 71. 395–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I.
1998The critical period for language acquisition and the deaf child’s language comprehension: A psycholinguistic approach. Bulletin de Audiophonologie 141. 349–360.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Rose E. & Michael A. Karchmer
2004Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 4(2). 138–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, Aslı
2018Cross-linguistic variation in children’s multimodal utterances. In Maya Hickmann, Edy Veneziano & Harriet Jisa (eds.), Sources of variation in first language acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners, 123–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela M., Inge Zwitserlood & Aslı Özyürek
2015Does space structure spatial language? A comparison of spatial expression across sign languages. Language 91(3). 611–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sümer, Beyza
2015Acquisition of spatial language by signing and speaking children: A comparison of Turkish Sign Language (TİD) and Turkish. Nijmegen: Radboud University PhD dissertation.
Sümer, Beyza & Aslı Özyürek
2020No effects of modality in development of locative expressions of space in signing and speaking children. Journal of Child Language 47(6). 1101–1131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar