Seeing sentence boundaries

Jordan Fenlon | University College London

Tanya Denmark

Ruth Campbell

Bencie Woll

Linguists have suggested that non-manual and manual markers are used in sign languages to indicate prosodic and syntactic boundaries. However, little is known about how native signers interpret non-manual and manual cues with respect to sentence boundaries. Six native signers of British Sign Language (BSL) were asked to mark sentence boundaries in two narratives: one presented in BSL and one in Swedish Sign Language (SSL). For comparative analysis, non-signers undertook the same tasks. Results indicated that both native signers and non-signers were able to use visual cues effectively in segmentation and that their decisions were not dependent on knowledge of the signed language. Signed narratives contain visible cues to their prosodic structure which are available to signers and non-signers alike.

Keywords: sentence boundaries, segmentation

Published online: 01 October 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.2.06fen

Cited by

Cited by 21 other publications

No author info given

2011. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ► pp. 779 ff.

Applebaum, Lauren, Marie Coppola & Susan Goldin-Meadow

2014. Prosody in a communication system developed without a language model. Sign Language & Linguistics 17:2 ► pp. 181 ff.

Borneman, Joshua D., Malaia, Evie & Wilbur, Ronnie B.

2018. Motion characterization using optical flow and fractal complexity. Journal of Electronic Imaging 27:05 ► pp. 1 ff.

Brentari, Diane & Susan Goldin-Meadow

2017. Language Emergence. Annual Review of Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 363 ff.

Brentari, Diane, Carolina González, Amanda Seidl & Ronnie Wilbur

2011. Sensitivity to Visual Prosodic Cues in Signers and Nonsigners. Language and Speech 54:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

BRENTARI, DIANE, MARIE A. NADOLSKE & GEORGE WOLFORD

2012. Can experience with co-speech gesture influence the prosody of a sign language? Sign language prosodic cues in bimodal bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15:2 ► pp. 402 ff.

Börstell, Carl, Tommi Jantunen, Vadim Kimmelman, Vanja de Lint, Johanna Mesch & Marloes Oomen

2019. Transitivity prominence within and across modalities. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 666 ff.

Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Christina Healy & Wendy Sandler

2013. Visual intonation in two sign languages. Phonology 30:2 ► pp. 211 ff.

de Vos, Connie, Francisco Torreira & Stephen C. Levinson

2015. Turn-timing in signed conversations: coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology 6

Endress, Ansgar D. & Marc D. Hauser

2010. Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues. Cognitive Psychology 61:2 ► pp. 177 ff.

Endress, Ansgar D. & Alan Langus

2017. Transitional probabilities count more than frequency, but might not be used for memorization. Cognitive Psychology 92 ► pp. 37 ff.

Endress, Ansgar D. & Justin N. Wood

2011. From movements to actions: Two mechanisms for learning action sequences. Cognitive Psychology 63:3 ► pp. 141 ff.

Frederiksen, Anne Therese & Rachel I. Mayberry

2019. Reference tracking in early stages of different modality L2 acquisition: Limited over-explicitness in novice ASL signers’ referring expressions. Second Language Research 35:2 ► pp. 253 ff.

Hodge, Gabrielle & Trevor Johnston

2014. Points, Depictions, Gestures and Enactment: Partly Lexical and Non-Lexical Signs as Core Elements of Single Clause-Like Units in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 262 ff.

Jola, Corinne, Phil McAleer, Marie-Hélène Grosbras, Scott A. Love, Gordon Morison & Frank E. Pollick

2013. Uni- and Multisensory Brain Areas are Synchronised across Spectators When Watching Unedited Dance Recordings. i-Perception 4:4 ► pp. 265 ff.

Kastner, Itamar, Irit Meir, Wendy Sandler & Svetlana Dachkovsky

2014. The emergence of embedded structure: insights from Kafr Qasem Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 5

Loos, Cornelia

2018. Detecting clauses and their dependencies in signed utterances: A syntactico-semantic approach. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 123 ff.

Malaia, Evie, Joshua D. Borneman & Ronnie B. Wilbur

2016. Assessment of information content in visual signal: analysis of optical flow fractal complexity. Visual Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 246 ff.

Mesh, Kate & Lynn Hou

2018. Negation in San Juan Quiahije Chatino Sign Language. Gesture 17:3 ► pp. 330 ff.

Napoli, Donna Jo, Jami Fisher & Gene Mirus

2013. Bleached taboo-term predicates in American Sign Language. Lingua 123 ► pp. 148 ff.

Sze, Felix

2015. Is Hong Kong Sign Language a topic-prominent language?. Linguistics 53:4

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.