Article published In:
Identifying sentences in signed languagesEdited by Onno A. Crasborn
[Sign Language & Linguistics 10:2] 2007
► pp. 177–200
Edited by Onno A. Crasborn
[Sign Language & Linguistics 10:2] 2007
► pp. 177–200
Seeing sentence boundaries
Linguists have suggested that non-manual and manual markers are used in sign languages to indicate prosodic and syntactic boundaries. However, little is known about how native signers interpret non-manual and manual cues with respect to sentence boundaries. Six native signers of British Sign Language (BSL) were asked to mark sentence boundaries in two narratives: one presented in BSL and one in Swedish Sign Language (SSL). For comparative analysis, non-signers undertook the same tasks. Results indicated that both native signers and non-signers were able to use visual cues effectively in segmentation and that their decisions were not dependent on knowledge of the signed language. Signed narratives contain visible cues to their prosodic structure which are available to signers and non-signers alike.
Keywords: sentence boundaries, segmentation
Cited by
Cited by 30 other publications
Applebaum, Lauren, Marie Coppola & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2014. Prosody in a communication system developed without a language model. Sign Language & Linguistics 17:2 ► pp. 181 ff. 
Borneman, Joshua D., Malaia, Evie & Wilbur, Ronnie B.
2018. Motion characterization using optical flow and fractal complexity. Journal of Electronic Imaging 27:05 ► pp. 1 ff.
Brentari, Diane & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2017. Language Emergence. Annual Review of Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 363 ff.
Brentari, Diane, Carolina González, Amanda Seidl & Ronnie Wilbur
2011. Sensitivity to Visual Prosodic Cues in Signers and Nonsigners. Language and Speech 54:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
BRENTARI, DIANE, MARIE A. NADOLSKE & GEORGE WOLFORD
2012. Can experience with co-speech gesture influence the prosody of a sign language? Sign language prosodic cues in bimodal bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15:2 ► pp. 402 ff.
Bull, Hannah, Michèle Gouiffès & Annelies Braffort
2020. Automatic Segmentation of Sign Language into Subtitle-Units. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2020 Workshops [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12536], ► pp. 186 ff.
Börstell, Carl, Tommi Jantunen, Vadim Kimmelman, Vanja de Lint, Johanna Mesch & Marloes Oomen
2019. Transitivity prominence within and across modalities. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 666 ff.
Cooperrider, Kensy, Jordan Fenlon, Jonathan Keane, Diane Brentari & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2021. How Pointing is Integrated into Language: Evidence From Speakers and Signers. Frontiers in Communication 6
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Christina Healy & Wendy Sandler
2013. Visual intonation in two sign languages. Phonology 30:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Rose Stamp & Wendy Sandler
2023. Mapping the body to the discourse hierarchy in sign language emergence. Language and Cognition 15:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
de Vos, Connie, Francisco Torreira & Stephen C. Levinson
2015. Turn-timing in signed conversations: coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Endress, Ansgar D.
2022. In defense of epicycles: Embracing complexity in psychological explanations. Mind & Language
Endress, Ansgar D. & Marc D. Hauser
2010. Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues. Cognitive Psychology 61:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Endress, Ansgar D. & Alan Langus
2017. Transitional probabilities count more than frequency, but might not be used for memorization. Cognitive Psychology 92 ► pp. 37 ff.
Endress, Ansgar D., Lauren K. Slone & Scott P. Johnson
2020. Statistical learning and memory. Cognition 204 ► pp. 104346 ff.
Endress, Ansgar D. & Justin N. Wood
2011. From movements to actions: Two mechanisms for learning action sequences. Cognitive Psychology 63:3 ► pp. 141 ff.
Frederiksen, Anne Therese & Rachel I. Mayberry
2019. Reference tracking in early stages of different modality L2 acquisition: Limited over-explicitness in novice ASL signers’ referring expressions. Second Language Research 35:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Hodge, Gabrielle & Trevor Johnston
2014. Points, Depictions, Gestures and Enactment: Partly Lexical and Non-Lexical Signs as Core Elements of Single Clause-Like Units in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 262 ff.
Jola, Corinne, Phil McAleer, Marie-Hélène Grosbras, Scott A. Love, Gordon Morison & Frank E. Pollick
2013. Uni- and Multisensory Brain Areas are Synchronised across Spectators When Watching Unedited Dance Recordings. i-Perception 4:4 ► pp. 265 ff.
Kastner, Itamar, Irit Meir, Wendy Sandler & Svetlana Dachkovsky
2014. The emergence of embedded structure: insights from Kafr Qasem Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 5
Kocab, Annemarie, Ann Senghas, Marie Coppola & Jesse Snedeker
2023. Potentially recursive structures emerge quickly when a new language community forms. Cognition 232 ► pp. 105261 ff.
Loos, Cornelia
2018. Detecting clauses and their dependencies in signed utterances: A syntactico-semantic approach. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
Malaia, Evie, Joshua D. Borneman & Ronnie B. Wilbur
2016. Assessment of information content in visual signal: analysis of optical flow fractal complexity. Visual Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 246 ff.
Mesh, Kate & Lynn Hou
Napoli, Donna Jo, Jami Fisher & Gene Mirus
2013. Bleached taboo-term predicates in American Sign Language. Lingua 123 ► pp. 148 ff.
Napoli, Donna Jo, Jami Fisher & Gene Mirus
2023. Taboo in Sign Languages,
Raičević Bajić, Dragana, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Adam Schembri & Mieke Van Herreweghe
2021. Constituent order in Serbian Sign Language declarative clauses. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1
Sze, Felix
2015. Is Hong Kong Sign Language a topic-prominent language?. Linguistics 53:4
Winston, Elizabeth A. & Cynthia Roy
2015. Discourse analysis and sign languages. In Sociolinguistics and Deaf Communities, ► pp. 95 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ► pp. 779 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.