Review published In:
Identifying sentences in signed languages
Edited by Onno A. Crasborn
[Sign Language & Linguistics 10:2] 2007
► pp. 201212

Selected references

Alexiadou, Artemis, Paul Law, Andre Meinunger & Chris Wilder
(eds) 2000The syntax of relative clauses. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basilico, David
1996Head position and internally headed relative clauses. Language 721, 498–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branchini, Chiara & Caterina Donati
In press. Italian Sign Language relatives: a contribution to the typology of relativization strategies. To appear in A. Liptak ed. Correlatives: theory and typology North Holland Linguistic series 681 Amsterdam Elsevier
Bhatt, Rajesh
2005Three theories of relative clauses. The syntax and semantics of nominal modification. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
1999Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Sandro Zucchi
2004Why is SpecCP on the right in sign languages? Paper presented at GLOW 2004, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi
2006Strategies of relativization in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 241, 945–975. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Donati, Caterina
2000La sintassi della comparazione. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
2006On wh-head-movement. In L. Cheng & N. Corver (eds.), Wh-movement on the move, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander & Fred Landman
1998Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 61, 125–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin E.
1998Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 741, 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Ben Bahan & Robert G. Lee
2000The syntax of American Sign Language. Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Percus, Orin
1997Prying open the cleft. In K. Kusumoto (ed.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, 337–351. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko
1999Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 81, 147–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

2019. On the cardinal system in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Journal of Linguistics 55:4  pp. 795 ff. DOI logo
Saral, Burcu & Meltem Kelepir
2020. The universal quantifier ‘all’ in Turkish Sign Language. In Morphological Complexity within and across Boundaries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 215],  pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.