Book review
Warum braucht die Deutsche Gebärdensprache kein Passiv? Verfahren der Markierung semantischer Rollen in der DGS
[Why can German Sign Language (DGS) do without a passive construction? Ways of marking semantic roles in DGS]
Reviewed by
Martje Hansen | University of Applied Sciences, Magdeburg-Stendal (Germany)
References
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1979 Ergativity.
Language 55 (1), 59–138.
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Du Bois, John W.
1987 The discourse basis of ergativity.
Language 63 (4), 805–855.
Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language 561, 251–299.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Barberà, Gemma & Josep Quer
Krebs, Julia, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Dietmar Roehm
2020.
Distributional properties of an agreement marker in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS).
Linguistics 58:4
► pp. 1151 ff.
Nordlund, Sanna
2019.
Agent defocusing in two-participant clauses in Finnish Sign Language.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.