Review published in:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 11:1 (2008) ► pp. 103107
Ann, Jean
1993A linguistic investigation of the relationship between physiology and handshape. University of Arizona dissertation.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny
1990Acquisition of the handshape in American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In V. Volterra and C. Erting (eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children, 107–127. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane
1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eccarius, Petra
2008A constraint-based account of handshape contrast in sign languages. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University dissertation.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward
2002Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greftegreff, Irene
1993A few notes on anatomy and distinctive features in NTS handshapes. Working Papers in Linguistics, 171. 48–68. Department of Linguistics, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin
1995Japanese phonology: Constraint domains and structure preservation. In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 817–838. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark
1981Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye
1997Perceptual distance of contrast: Vowel height and nasality. In R. Walker, M. Katayama & D. Karvonen (eds.) Phonology at Santa Cruz 51, 63–78. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul
1993Optimality theory. Technical Report #2 of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers, NJ. (ROA Version, 8/2002).Google Scholar