Review published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 11:1 (2008) ► pp.103107
References (10)
Ann, Jean
1993A linguistic investigation of the relationship between physiology and handshape. University of Arizona dissertation.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny
1990Acquisition of the handshape in American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In V. Volterra and C. Erting (eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children, 107–127. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane
1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eccarius, Petra
2008A constraint-based account of handshape contrast in sign languages. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University dissertation.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward
2002Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greftegreff, Irene
1993A few notes on anatomy and distinctive features in NTS handshapes. Working Papers in Linguistics, 171. 48–68. Department of Linguistics, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin
1995Japanese phonology: Constraint domains and structure preservation. In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 817–838. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark
1981Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye
1997Perceptual distance of contrast: Vowel height and nasality. In R. Walker, M. Katayama & D. Karvonen (eds.) Phonology at Santa Cruz 51, 63–78. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul
1993Optimality theory. Technical Report #2 of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers, NJ. (ROA Version, 8/2002).Google Scholar