Previous research on speech and gesture has found that repeated references are often linguistically reduced in terms of, for example, the number of words and the acoustic realization of these words, compared to initial references. The present study looks at the production of repeated references by 14 signers of Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Participants had to describe figures to an addressee, who had to pick the correct figure from a large group of figures. Several figures had to be described several times. The question was whether there would be reduction in the repeated references. We found systematic effects of repetition in that repeated references were shorter, contained fewer signs, and shorter signs than initial references. Moreover, in order to measure sign precision, a perception test was used where participants had to judge, in a forced choice task, which sign they considered to be the most precise, looking at 40 pairs of video clips with signs produced in either initial or repeated references to the same object by the same signer. We found that, non-signing participants (but not signing participants) consider signs produced during repeated references to be less precise than the signs produced during initial references. Taking together these results suggest that a similar reduction process in repeated references occurs in NGT as has been found previously for speech and gesture.
1980Prolegomena to Menzerath’s law. Glottometrika 21. 1-10.
Arnold, Jennifer E.
2008Reference production: production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(4). 495-527.
Arnold, Jennifer E., Jason M. Kahn & Giulia C. Pancani.
2012Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 19(3). 505-512.
Aylett, Matthew & Alice Turk.
2004The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31-56.
Bard, Ellen G., Anne H. Anderson, Catherine Sotillo, Matthew Aylett, Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon & Alison Newlands.
2000Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 421. 1-22.
Bard, Ellen G. & Matthew Aylett.
2005Referential form, duration, and modelling the listener in spoken dialogue. In John Trueswell & Michael Tanenhaus (eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions, 173-191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bell, Alan, Jason Brenier, Michelle Gregory, Cynthia Girand & Dan Jurafsky.
2009Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 601. 92-111.
Brennan, Susan & Herb Clark.
1996Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22(6). 1482-1493.
Brentari, Diane.
1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brentari, Diane.
2002Modality differences in sign language phonology and morphophonemics. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy A. Cormier & David G. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 35-64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brentari, Diane, Carolina Gonzalez, Amanda Seidl & Ronnie B. Wilbur.
2011Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners. Language and Speech 54(1). 49-72.
Clark, Herb.
1973The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 121. 335-359.
Clark, Herb & Diane Wilkes-Gibbs.
1986Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 221. 1-39.
Crasborn, Onno.
2001Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in sign language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, LOT, Utrecht.
de Ruiter, Jan P., Adrian Bangerter & Paula Dings.
2012The interplay between gesture and speech in the production of referring expressions: investigating the trade-off hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(2). 232-248.
Ernestus, Mirjam & Natasha Warner.
2011An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants [Editorial]. Journal of Phonetics 391. 253-260.
Fenk, August & Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon.
1993Menzerath’s law and the constant flow of linguistic information. In Reinhard Köhler & Burghard Rieger (eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics, 11-31. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2008Ambiguity, accessibility, and a division of labor for communicative success. Learning and Motivation 491. 209-246.
Fowler, Carol A.
1988Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Language and Speech 31(4). 307-319.
Fowler, Carol A. & Jonathan Housum.
1987Talkers’ signaling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26(5). 489-504.
Galati, Alexia & Susan Brennan.
2010Attenuating information in spoken communication: for the speaker, or for the addressee? Journal of Memory and Language 621. 35-51.
Gee, James & Wendy Goodhart.
1988American Sign Language and the human biological capacity for language. In Michael Strong (ed.), Language learning and deafness, 49-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2011GREEBLES Greeble greeb. On reduction in speech and gesture in repeated references. In Laura Carlson, Christoph Hoelscher & Thomas F. Shipley (eds.),
33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society
, 3250-3255. Boston: Cognitive Science Society.
Holler, Judith & Katie Wilkin.
2009Communicating common ground: how mutually shared knowledge influences speech and gesture in a narrative task. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2). 267-289.
Jaeger, Tim Florian.
2010Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1). 23-62.
2010Toward a phonetic representation of signs: sequentiality and contrast. Sign Language Studies 11(2). 241-274.
Kelly, Spencer D., Sarah M. Manning & Sabrian Rodak.
2008Gesture gives a hand to language and learning: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology and education. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(4). 569-588.
Kendon, Adam.
1980Gesture and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance. In Mary R. Key (ed.), Nonverbal communication and language, 207-227. The Hague: Mouton.
Kendon, Adam.
2004Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi.
1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Koolen, Ruud, Albert Gatt, Martijn Goudbeek & Emiel Krahmer.
2011Factors causing overspecification in definite descriptions. Journal of Pragmatics 43(13). 3231-3250.
Krahmer, Emiel & Marc Swerts.
2007The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language 571. 396-414.
Lam, Tuan Q. & Duane G. Watson.
2010Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence. Memory and Cognition 38(8). 1137-1146.
Leuninger, Helen, Annette Hohenberger, Eva Waleschkowski, Elke Menges & Daniela Happ.
2004The impact of modality on language production: Evidence from slips of the tongue and hand. In Thomas Pechmann & Christopher Habel (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production, 219-277. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson.
1989American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies 641. 195-277.
Lieberman, Philip.
1963Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech 6(3). 172-187.
Lindblom, Björn.
1990Explaning variation: a sketch of the H and H theory. In William Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 403-439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mauk, Claude E., Björn Lindblom & Richard P. Meier.
2008Undershoot of ASL locations in fast signing. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 8, 3-24. Hamburg: Signum.
McNeill, David.
1992Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Russell, Kevin, Erin Wilkinson & Terry Janzen.
2011ASL sign lowering as undershoot: a corpus study. Laboratory Phonology 2(2). 403-422.
Samuel, Arthur G. & Mateusz Troicki.
1998Articulation quality is inversely related to redundancy when children or adults have verbal control. Journal of Memory and Language 39(2). 175-194.
Sandler, Wendy.
1989Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris.
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin.
2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schembri, Adam, David McKee, Rachel McKee, Sara Pivac, Trevor Johnston & Della Goswell.
2009Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change 211. 193-231.
Shannon, Claude.
1948A mathematical theory of communications. Bell Systems Technical Journal 27(4). 623-656.
Singleton, Jenny L., Jill P. Morford & Susan Goldin-Meadow.
1993Once is not enough: standards of well-formedness in manual communication created over three different timespans. Language 691. 683-715.
Stokoe, William C.
2005Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1). 3-37.
Supalla, Ted.
2008Sign language archeology: integrating historical linguistics with fieldwork on young sign languages. In: Ronice Müller de Quadros (ed.),
Sign languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present, and future. Forty-five papers and three posters from the 9th theoretical issues in sign language research conference
, Florianópolis, Brazil, December 2006 Petrópolis: Editora Arara Azul. [Available at: [URL]].
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude E. Mauk.
2010Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 381. 317-328.
Van Deemter, Kees, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power.
2012Generation of referring expressions: Assessing the incremental algorithm. Cognitive Science 36(5). 799-836.
van der Hulst, Harry.
1993Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10(2). 209-241.
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes.
2006ELAN: a professional framework for multimodality research. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006). Genoa, Italy, 24–26 May 2006.
Zipf, George K.
1936The psychobiology of language. London: Routledge.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Klassen, Jeffrey & Michael Wagner
2017. Prosodic prominence shifts are anaphoric. Journal of Memory and Language 92 ► pp. 305 ff.
SEHYR, ZED SEVCIKOVA, BRENDA NICODEMUS, JENNIFER PETRICH & KAREN EMMOREY
2018. Referring strategies in American Sign Language and English (with co-speech gesture): The role of modality in referring to non-nameable objects. Applied Psycholinguistics 39:5 ► pp. 961 ff.
2024. A kinematic study of phonetic reduction in a young sign language. Journal of Phonetics 104 ► pp. 101311 ff.
TURNBULL, RORY
2023. The Effect of Usage Predictability on Phonetic and Phonological Variation. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 145 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.