Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (2014) ► pp.5681
Altmann, Gabriel.
1980Prolegomena to Menzerath’s law. Glottometrika 21. 1-10.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E..
2008Reference production: production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(4). 495-527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E., Jason M. Kahn & Giulia C. Pancani.
2012Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 19(3). 505-512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aylett, Matthew & Alice Turk.
2004The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31-56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bard, Ellen G., Anne H. Anderson, Catherine Sotillo, Matthew Aylett, Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon & Alison Newlands.
2000Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 421. 1-22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bard, Ellen G. & Matthew Aylett.
2005Referential form, duration, and modelling the listener in spoken dialogue. In John Trueswell & Michael Tanenhaus (eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions, 173-191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan, Jason Brenier, Michelle Gregory, Cynthia Girand & Dan Jurafsky.
2009Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 601. 92-111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Susan & Herb Clark.
1996Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22(6). 1482-1493.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane.
1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002Modality differences in sign language phonology and morphophonemics. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy A. Cormier & David G. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 35-64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Carolina Gonzalez, Amanda Seidl & Ronnie B. Wilbur.
2011Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners. Language and Speech 54(1). 49-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herb.
1973The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 121. 335-359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herb & Diane Wilkes-Gibbs.
1986Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 221. 1-39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno.
2001Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in sign language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, LOT, Utrecht.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, Jan P., Adrian Bangerter & Paula Dings.
2012The interplay between gesture and speech in the production of referring expressions: investigating the trade-off hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(2). 232-248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam & Natasha Warner.
2011An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants [Editorial]. Journal of Phonetics 391. 253-260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenk, August & Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon.
1993Menzerath’s law and the constant flow of linguistic information. In Reinhard Köhler & Burghard Rieger (eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics, 11-31. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud.
2001Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 431-448. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Victor S..
2008Ambiguity, accessibility, and a division of labor for communicative success. Learning and Motivation 491. 209-246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Carol A..
1988Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Language and Speech 31(4). 307-319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Carol A. & Jonathan Housum.
1987Talkers’ signaling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26(5). 489-504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galati, Alexia & Susan Brennan.
2010Attenuating information in spoken communication: for the speaker, or for the addressee? Journal of Memory and Language 621. 35-51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, James & Wendy Goodhart.
1988American Sign Language and the human biological capacity for language. In Michael Strong (ed.), Language learning and deafness, 49-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerwing, Jennifer & Janet Bavelas.
2004Linguistic influences on gesture’s form. Gesture 41. 157-195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P..
1975Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski.
1993Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 691. 274-307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoetjes, Marieke, Ruud Koolen, Martijn Goudbeek, Emiel Krahmer & Marc Swerts.
2011GREEBLES Greeble greeb. On reduction in speech and gesture in repeated references. In Laura Carlson, Christoph Hoelscher & Thomas F. Shipley (eds.), 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 3250-3255. Boston: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Holler, Judith & Katie Wilkin.
2009Communicating common ground: how mutually shared knowledge influences speech and gesture in a narrative task. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2). 267-289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Tim Florian.
2010Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1). 23-62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Tim Florian & Harry Tily.
2011Language processing complexity and communicative efficiency. WIREs: Cognitive Science 2(3). 323-335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Robert E. & Scott K. Liddell.
2010Toward a phonetic representation of signs: sequentiality and contrast. Sign Language Studies 11(2). 241-274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Spencer D., Sarah M. Manning & Sabrian Rodak.
2008Gesture gives a hand to language and learning: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology and education. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(4). 569-588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam.
1980Gesture and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance. In Mary R. Key (ed.), Nonverbal communication and language, 207-227. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
2004Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi.
1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Koolen, Ruud, Albert Gatt, Martijn Goudbeek & Emiel Krahmer.
2011Factors causing overspecification in definite descriptions. Journal of Pragmatics 43(13). 3231-3250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krahmer, Emiel & Marc Swerts.
2007The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language 571. 396-414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, Tuan Q. & Duane G. Watson.
2010Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence. Memory and Cognition 38(8). 1137-1146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leuninger, Helen, Annette Hohenberger, Eva Waleschkowski, Elke Menges & Daniela Happ.
2004The impact of modality on language production: Evidence from slips of the tongue and hand. In Thomas Pechmann & Christopher Habel (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production, 219-277. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson.
1989American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies 641. 195-277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Philip.
1963Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech 6(3). 172-187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn.
1990Explaning variation: a sketch of the H and H theory. In William Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 403-439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauk, Claude E., Björn Lindblom & Richard P. Meier.
2008Undershoot of ASL locations in fast signing. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 8, 3-24. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
McNeill, David.
1992Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Kevin, Erin Wilkinson & Terry Janzen.
2011ASL sign lowering as undershoot: a corpus study. Laboratory Phonology 2(2). 403-422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuel, Arthur G. & Mateusz Troicki.
1998Articulation quality is inversely related to redundancy when children or adults have verbal control. Journal of Memory and Language 39(2). 175-194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy.
1989Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin.
2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam, David McKee, Rachel McKee, Sara Pivac, Trevor Johnston & Della Goswell.
2009Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change 211. 193-231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Claude.
1948A mathematical theory of communications. Bell Systems Technical Journal 27(4). 623-656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singleton, Jenny L., Jill P. Morford & Susan Goldin-Meadow.
1993Once is not enough: standards of well-formedness in manual communication created over three different timespans. Language 691. 683-715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William C..
2005Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1). 3-37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted.
2008Sign language archeology: integrating historical linguistics with fieldwork on young sign languages. In: Ronice Müller de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present, and future. Forty-five papers and three posters from the 9th theoretical issues in sign language research conference , Florianópolis, Brazil, December 2006 Petrópolis: Editora Arara Azul. [Available at: [URL]].Google Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude E. Mauk.
2010Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 381. 317-328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Deemter, Kees, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power.
2012Generation of referring expressions: Assessing the incremental algorithm. Cognitive Science 36(5). 799-836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry.
1993Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10(2). 209-241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Sluis, Ielka & Emiel Krahmer.
2007Generating multimodal referring expressions. Discourse Processes 44(3). 145-174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes.
2006ELAN: a professional framework for multimodality research. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006). Genoa, Italy, 24–26 May 2006.
Zipf, George K..
1936The psychobiology of language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Klassen, Jeffrey & Michael Wagner
2017. Prosodic prominence shifts are anaphoric. Journal of Memory and Language 92  pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
2018. Referring strategies in American Sign Language and English (with co-speech gesture): The role of modality in referring to non-nameable objects. Applied Psycholinguistics 39:5  pp. 961 ff. DOI logo
2023. The Effect of Usage Predictability on Phonetic and Phonological Variation. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics,  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.