Cover not available
Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (2014) ► pp.56–81

Do repeated references result in sign reduction?

| Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC)
Previous research on speech and gesture has found that repeated references are often linguistically reduced in terms of, for example, the number of words and the acoustic realization of these words, compared to initial references. The present study looks at the production of repeated references by 14 signers of Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Participants had to describe figures to an addressee, who had to pick the correct figure from a large group of figures. Several figures had to be described several times. The question was whether there would be reduction in the repeated references. We found systematic effects of repetition in that repeated references were shorter, contained fewer signs, and shorter signs than initial references. Moreover, in order to measure sign precision, a perception test was used where participants had to judge, in a forced choice task, which sign they considered to be the most precise, looking at 40 pairs of video clips with signs produced in either initial or repeated references to the same object by the same signer. We found that, non-signing participants (but not signing participants) consider signs produced during repeated references to be less precise than the signs produced during initial references. Taking together these results suggest that a similar reduction process in repeated references occurs in NGT as has been found previously for speech and gesture.
Keywords: sign language, repeated reference, reduction
Published online: 6 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.17.1.03hoe
References
Altmann, Gabriel.
1980 Prolegomena to Menzerath’s law. Glottometrika 21. 1-10.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E..
2008 Reference production: production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(4). 495-527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E., Jason M. Kahn & Giulia C. Pancani.
2012 Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 19(3). 505-512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aylett, Matthew & Alice Turk.
2004 The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31-56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bard, Ellen G., Anne H. Anderson, Catherine Sotillo, Matthew Aylett, Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon & Alison Newlands.
2000 Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 421. 1-22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bard, Ellen G. & Matthew Aylett.
2005 Referential form, duration, and modelling the listener in spoken dialogue. In John Trueswell & Michael Tanenhaus (eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions, 173-191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan, Jason Brenier, Michelle Gregory, Cynthia Girand & Dan Jurafsky.
2009 Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 601. 92-111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Susan & Herb Clark.
1996 Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22(6). 1482-1493.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane.
1998 A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002 Modality differences in sign language phonology and morphophonemics. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy A. Cormier & David G. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 35-64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Carolina Gonzalez, Amanda Seidl & Ronnie B. Wilbur.
2011 Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners. Language and Speech 54(1). 49-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herb.
1973 The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 121. 335-359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herb & Diane Wilkes-Gibbs.
1986 Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 221. 1-39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno.
2001 Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in sign language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, LOT, Utrecht.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, Jan P., Adrian Bangerter & Paula Dings.
2012 The interplay between gesture and speech in the production of referring expressions: investigating the trade-off hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(2). 232-248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam & Natasha Warner.
2011 An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants [Editorial]. Journal of Phonetics 391. 253-260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenk, August & Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon.
1993 Menzerath’s law and the constant flow of linguistic information. In Reinhard Köhler & Burghard Rieger (eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics, 11-31. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud.
2001 Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 431-448. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Victor S..
2008 Ambiguity, accessibility, and a division of labor for communicative success. Learning and Motivation 491. 209-246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Carol A..
1988 Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Language and Speech 31(4). 307-319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Carol A. & Jonathan Housum.
1987 Talkers’ signaling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26(5). 489-504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galati, Alexia & Susan Brennan.
2010 Attenuating information in spoken communication: for the speaker, or for the addressee? Journal of Memory and Language 621. 35-51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, James & Wendy Goodhart.
1988 American Sign Language and the human biological capacity for language. In Michael Strong (ed.), Language learning and deafness, 49-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerwing, Jennifer & Janet Bavelas.
2004 Linguistic influences on gesture’s form. Gesture 41. 157-195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P..
1975 Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski.
1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 691. 274-307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoetjes, Marieke, Ruud Koolen, Martijn Goudbeek, Emiel Krahmer & Marc Swerts.
2011 GREEBLES Greeble greeb. On reduction in speech and gesture in repeated references. In Laura Carlson, Christoph Hoelscher & Thomas F. Shipley (eds.), 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 3250-3255. Boston: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Holler, Judith & Katie Wilkin.
2009 Communicating common ground: how mutually shared knowledge influences speech and gesture in a narrative task. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2). 267-289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Tim Florian.
2010 Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1). 23-62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Tim Florian & Harry Tily.
2011 Language processing complexity and communicative efficiency. WIREs: Cognitive Science 2(3). 323-335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Robert E. & Scott K. Liddell.
2010 Toward a phonetic representation of signs: sequentiality and contrast. Sign Language Studies 11(2). 241-274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Spencer D., Sarah M. Manning & Sabrian Rodak.
2008 Gesture gives a hand to language and learning: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology and education. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(4). 569-588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam.
1980 Gesture and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance. In Mary R. Key (ed.), Nonverbal communication and language, 207-227. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
2004 Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi.
1979 The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Koolen, Ruud, Albert Gatt, Martijn Goudbeek & Emiel Krahmer.
2011 Factors causing overspecification in definite descriptions. Journal of Pragmatics 43(13). 3231-3250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krahmer, Emiel & Marc Swerts.
2007 The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language 571. 396-414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, Tuan Q. & Duane G. Watson.
2010 Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence. Memory and Cognition 38(8). 1137-1146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leuninger, Helen, Annette Hohenberger, Eva Waleschkowski, Elke Menges & Daniela Happ.
2004 The impact of modality on language production: Evidence from slips of the tongue and hand. In Thomas Pechmann & Christopher Habel (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production, 219-277. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson.
1989 American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies 641. 195-277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Philip.
1963 Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech 6(3). 172-187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn.
1990 Explaning variation: a sketch of the H and H theory. In William Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 403-439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauk, Claude E., Björn Lindblom & Richard P. Meier.
2008 Undershoot of ASL locations in fast signing. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 8, 3-24. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
McNeill, David.
1992 Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Kevin, Erin Wilkinson & Terry Janzen.
2011 ASL sign lowering as undershoot: a corpus study. Laboratory Phonology 2(2). 403-422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuel, Arthur G. & Mateusz Troicki.
1998 Articulation quality is inversely related to redundancy when children or adults have verbal control. Journal of Memory and Language 39(2). 175-194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy.
1989 Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin.
2006 Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam, David McKee, Rachel McKee, Sara Pivac, Trevor Johnston & Della Goswell.
2009 Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change 211. 193-231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Claude.
1948 A mathematical theory of communications. Bell Systems Technical Journal 27(4). 623-656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singleton, Jenny L., Jill P. Morford & Susan Goldin-Meadow.
1993 Once is not enough: standards of well-formedness in manual communication created over three different timespans. Language 691. 683-715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William C..
2005 Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1). 3-37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted.
2008 Sign language archeology: integrating historical linguistics with fieldwork on young sign languages. In: Ronice Müller de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present, and future. Forty-five papers and three posters from the 9th theoretical issues in sign language research conference , Florianópolis, Brazil, December 2006 Petrópolis: Editora Arara Azul. [Available at: [URL]].Google Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude E. Mauk.
2010 Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 381. 317-328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Deemter, Kees, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power.
2012 Generation of referring expressions: Assessing the incremental algorithm. Cognitive Science 36(5). 799-836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry.
1993 Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10(2). 209-241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Sluis, Ielka & Emiel Krahmer.
2007 Generating multimodal referring expressions. Discourse Processes 44(3). 145-174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes.
2006 ELAN: a professional framework for multimodality research. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006). Genoa, Italy, 24–26 May 2006.
Zipf, George K..
1936 The psychobiology of language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Klassen, Jeffrey & Michael Wagner
2017. Prosodic prominence shifts are anaphoric. Journal of Memory and Language 92 ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
SEHYR, ZED SEVCIKOVA, BRENDA NICODEMUS, JENNIFER PETRICH & KAREN EMMOREY
2018. Referring strategies in American Sign Language and English (with co-speech gesture): The role of modality in referring to non-nameable objects. Applied Psycholinguistics 39:5 ► pp. 961 ff. DOI logo
TURNBULL, RORY
2023. The Effect of Usage Predictability on Phonetic and Phonological Variation. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.